Interactivity Defuses the Impact of Mathematics Anxiety in Primary School Children

  • Michael Allen
  • Frédéric Vallée-TourangeauEmail author


Math anxiety impedes performance in simple arithmetic tasks. Anxiety constrains working memory capacity and particularly the attentional functions of the central executive. The experiment reported here explored how interactivity mitigated the impact of math anxiety on the performance of elementary school students with simple additions. It manipulated two independent variables. The first was the length of the additions—involving either 7 or 11 number tokens (the value of the tokens ranged from 1 to 20). The other was the level of interactivity: in the low interactivity condition participants could not touch or point to the number tokens that configured the sums, and in a high interactivity condition participants could manipulate the tokens as they saw fit in deriving their answer. The length of the addition had an impact on accuracy, with longer sums leading to poorer performance. However, overall, performance in the high interactivity condition was superior, in terms of accuracy, absolute calculation error and efficiency, than performance in the low interactivity condition. Mathematics anxiety significantly predicted performance in the low interactivity condition, but not in the high interactivity condition. These results suggest that working memory resources are augmented through interactivity with the physical problem presentation, defusing the impact of anxiety on performance.


Distributed cognition Interactivity Math anxiety Mental arithmetic 


  1. Ashcraft, M. H. (2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashcraft, M. H. & Faust, M. W. (1994). Mathematics anxiety and mental arithmetic performance: An exploratory investigation. Cognition & Emotion, 8, 97–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashcraft, M. H. & Kirk, E. P. (2001). The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 224–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashcraft, M. H. & Krause, J. A. (2007). Working memory, math performance, and math anxiety. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 243–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, M., Brown, P. & Bibby, T. (2008). “I would rather die”: Reasons given by 16-year-olds for not continuing their study of mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 10, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, R. (1999). Information seeking and achievement motivation in middle childhood and adolescence: The role of conceptions of ability. Developmental Psychology, 35, 146–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlson, R. A., Avraamides, M. N., Cary, M. & Strasberg, S. (2007). What do the hands externalize in simple arithmetic? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 747–756.Google Scholar
  9. Corbetta, M. & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Derakshan, N. & Eysenck, M. W. (2009). Anxiety, processing efficiency, and cognitive performance. European Psychologist, 14, 168–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eccles, J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 95–121). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  12. Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eysenck, M. W. & Calvo, M. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition & Emotion, 6, 409–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R. & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7, 336–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frank, M. & Barner, D. (2012). Representing exact number visually using mental abacus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 134–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Friedman, N. P. & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geary, D. C. & Widaman, K. F. (1992). Numerical cognition: On the convergence of componential and psychometric models. Intelligence, 16, 47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirsh, D. (1995). Complementary strategies: Why we use our hands when we think. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 212–217). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  20. Kirsh, D. (2013a). Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interactions, 20(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kirsh, D. (2013b). Thinking with external representations. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: Interactivity, cognition and human artifice (pp. 171–194). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Kirsh, D. & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krinzinger, H., Kaufmann, L. & Willmes, K. (2009). Math anxiety and math ability in early primary school years. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27, 206–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. LeFevre, J., DeStefano, D., Coleman, B. & Shanahan, T. (2005). Mathematical cognition and working memory. In J.I.D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of Mathematical Cognition (pp. 361–378). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  25. Logie, R. H., Gilhooly, K. J. & Wynn, V. (1994). Counting on working memory in arithmetic problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 22, 395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lyons, I. M. & Beilock, S. L. (2012). Mathematics anxiety: Separating the math from the anxiety. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 2102–2110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ma, X. & Xu, J. (2004). The causal ordering of mathematics anxiety and mathematics achievement: A longitudinal panel analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mattarella-Micke, A., Mateo, J., Kozak, M. N., Foster, K. & Beilock, S. L. (2011). Choke or thrive? The relation between salivary cortisol and math performance depends on individual differences in working memory and math-anxiety. Emotion, 11, 1000–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller, H. & Bichsel, J. (2004). Anxiety, working memory, gender, and math performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 591–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A. & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C. & Beilock, S. L. (2013). Math anxiety, working memory, and math achievement in early elementary school. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14, 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Richardson, F. C. & Suinn, R. M. (1972). The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19, 551–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sarason, I. G. (1988). Anxiety, self-preoccupation and attention. Anxiety Research, 1, 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seyler, D. J., Kirk, E. P. & Ashcraft, M. H. (2003). Elementary subtraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1339–1352.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, A. (2004). Making mathematics count: The report of Professor Adrian Smith’s inquiry into post-14 mathematics education. Retrieved from
  36. Suinn, R. M., Taylor, S. & Edwards, R. W. (1988). Suinn mathematics anxiety rating scale for elementary school students (MARS-E): Psychometric and normative data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 979–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tobias, S. & Weissbrod, C. (1980). Anxiety and mathematics: An update. Harvard Educational Review, 50, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2013). Interactivity, efficiency, and individual differences in mental arithmetic. Experimental Psychology, 60, 302–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Sirota, M. & Villejoubert, G. (2013). Reducing the impact of math anxiety on mental arithmetic: The importance of distributed cognition. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3615–3620). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
  40. Wechsler, D. (1991). WISC-III: Wechsler intelligence scale for children. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  41. Wigfield, A. & Meece, J. L. (1988). Math anxiety in elementary and secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 210–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wilson, R. A. & Clark, A. (2009). How to situate cognition: Letting nature take its course. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 55–77). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Yantis, S. (1998). Control of visual attention. Attention, 1, 223–256.Google Scholar
  44. Young, C. B., Wu, S. S. & Menon, V. (2012). The neurodevelopmental basis of math anxiety. Psychological Science, 23, 492–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kingston UniversitySurreyUK

Personalised recommendations