Algebraic Generalization Strategies Used by Kuwaiti Pre-service Teachers

  • Amal Hussain AlajmiEmail author


This study reports on the algebraic generalization strategies used by elementary and middle/high school pre-service mathematics teachers in Kuwait. They were presented with 9 tasks that involved linear, exponential, and quadratic situations. The results showed that these pre-service teachers had difficulty in generalizing algebraic rules in all 3 types of tasks. The most difficult problems were those involving exponents; they seemed to confuse exponential growth with the multiplication of n. Although they used several strategies such as explicit, recursive, and chunking, they tended to rely on explicit reasoning. They saw the explicit rule as a quick and easy rule to be used. In order to improve students’ understanding of algebraic reasoning, we must improve the understating of generalization. Teachers’ programs should put more emphasis on the type of content that teachers need to learn rather than on how much mathematics credits teachers need.


Algebraic reasoning Generalization Teacher education International study 



This work was supported by Kuwait University, research project no. [TT01/12].


  1. Alajmi, A. (2009). Addressing computational estimation in the Kuwaiti curriculum: Teachers’ views. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(4), 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alajmi, A. (2012). How do elementary textbooks address fractions? A review of mathematics textbooks in the USA, Japan, and Kuwait. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 239–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alajmi, A. & Reys, R. (2010). Eighth grade Kuwaiti students’ performance in recognizing reasonable answers and strategies they use to determine reasonable answers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Australian Education Council (1994). Mathematics: A curriculum profile for Australian schools. Carlton, MN: Curriculum Corporation.Google Scholar
  5. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H. & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbosa, A., Vale, I. & Palhares, P. (2012). Pattern tasks: Thinking processes used by 6th grade students. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, 15(3), 73–293.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, J. R. & Rivera, F. (2005). Generalization strategies of beginning high school algebra students. In H. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 121–128). Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  8. Bednarz, N., Kieran, C., & Lee, L. (Eds.). (1996). Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  9. Billings, E. (2008). Exploring generalizations through growth patterns. In C. E. Greenes & R. Rubenstein (Eds.), Algebra and algebraic thinking in school mathematics: Seventieth yearbook (pp. 279–293). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  10. Bishop, J.W. (1997). Middle school students’ understanding of mathematical patterns and their symbolic representations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  11. Carraher, D.W., Martinez, M.V., & Schliemann, A.D. (2008). Early algebra and mathematician generalization. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40(1), 3–22.Google Scholar
  12. Carraher, D. W. & Schliemann, A. D. (2007). Early algebra and algebraic reasoning. In F. Lester (Ed.), Handbook of research in mathematics education (pp. 669–705). Greenwich, England: Information Age.Google Scholar
  13. Chua, B. & Hoyles, C. (2012, July). Seeing through students’ eyes: The best-help strategy for pattern generalization. Paper presented at 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME-12), Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
  14. Confrey, J. & Smith, E. (1995). Splitting, covariation, and their role in the development of exponential functions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(1), 66–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Department of Education and Skills (2001). Frameworks for teaching mathematics: Years 7, 8, and 9. London, England: DFES Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Dienes, Z. P. (1961). On abstraction and generalization. Harvard Education Review, 3, 289–301.Google Scholar
  17. Ebersbach, M. & Wilkening, F. (2007). Children’s intuitive mathematics: The development of knowledge about nonlinear growth. Child Development, 78, 296–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellis, A. B. (2007). A taxonomy for categorizing generalizations: Generalizing actions and reflection generalizations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 221–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ellis, A. B. (2011). Generalizing-promoting actions: How classroom collaborations can support students’ mathematical generalizations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(4), 308–345.Google Scholar
  20. English, L. D. & Warren, E. A. (1995). General reasoning processes and elementary algebraic understanding: Implications for instruction. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 17(4), 1–19.Google Scholar
  21. English, L. D. & Warren, E. A. (1998). Introducing the variable through pattern exploration. The Mathematics Teacher, 91, 166–170.Google Scholar
  22. Güner, P., Ersoy, E. & Temiz, T. (2013). 7th and 8th grade students’ generalization strategies of patterns. International Journal of Global Education, 2(4), 38–54.Google Scholar
  23. Hallagan, J., Rule, A. & Carlson, L. (2009). Elementary school pre-service teachers’ understanding of algebraic generalizations. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 6(1&2), 201–206.Google Scholar
  24. Harel, G. & Tall, D. (1991). The general, the abstract and the generic in advanced mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 11, 38–42.Google Scholar
  25. Healy, L. & Hoyles, C. (1999). Visual and symbolic reasoning in mathematics: Making connections with computers? Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(1), 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaput, J. (1999). Teaching and learning a new algebra. In E. Fennema & T. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 133–155). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Kaput, J. (2008). What is algebra? What is algebraic reasoning? In J. Kaput, D. Carraher & M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 5–17). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Kaput, J., Carraher, D. & Blanton, M. (Eds.). (2008). Algebra in the early grades. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Kieran, C. (2007). Learning and teaching algebra at the middle school through college levels. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 707–762). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  30. Lannin, J. K. (2005). Generalization and justification: The challenge of introducing algebraic reasoning through patterning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(3), 231–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lannin, J. K., Barker, D. D. & Townsend, B. E. (2006). Algebraic generalization strategies: Factors influencing student strategy use. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(3), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee, L. (1996). Initiation into algebraic culture: Generalization. In L. Lee (Ed.), Approaches to algebra: Perspective for research and teaching (pp. 87–106). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  33. Lee, L. & Wheeler, D. (1987). Algebraic thinking in high school students: Their conceptions of generalization and justification, research report. Montreal, Canada: Concordia University.Google Scholar
  34. Marjanovic, M. M. & Zeljic, M. (2013). Algebra as a tool for structuring number systems. The Teaching of Mathematics, 16(2), 47–66.Google Scholar
  35. Mason, J. (1996). Expressing generality and roots of algebra. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 65–86). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  36. Moss, J., Beatty, R., McNab, S.L., & Eisenband, J. (2006). The potential of geometric sequences to foster young students’ ability to generalize in mathematics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  37. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  38. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Retrieved from
  39. Noss, R., Healy, L. & Hoyles, C. (1997). The construction of mathematical meanings: connecting the visual with the symbolic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33(2), 202–233.Google Scholar
  40. Orton, J., Orton, A. & Roper, T. (1999). Pictorial and practical contexts and the perception of pattern. In A. Orton (Ed.), Pattern in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 121–136). London, England: Cassel Wellington House.Google Scholar
  41. Reid, D. (2002). Conjectures and refutations in grade 5 mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(1), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rivera, F. (2007). Visualizing as a mathematical way of knowing: Understanding figural generalization. Mathematics Teacher, 101(1), 69–75.Google Scholar
  43. Rivera, F. D. & Becker, J. R. (2003). The effects of numerical and figural cues on the induction processes of preservice elementary mathematics teachers. In N. Pateman, B. Dougherty & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2003 Joint Meeting of PME and PMENA (Vol. 4, pp. 63–70). Honolulu: University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
  44. Rivera, F. D. & Becker, J. R. (2005). Figural and numerical modes of generalizing in algebra. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 11(4), 198–203.Google Scholar
  45. Schifter, D., Monk, S., Russell, S. J. & Bastable, V. (2008). Early algebra: What does understanding the laws of arithmetic mean in the elementary grades? In J. Kaput, D. Carraher & M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 413–447). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  46. Stacey, K. (1989). Finding and using patterns in linear generalizing problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20, 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stacey, K. & MacGregor, M. (1997). Building foundations for algebra. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 2(4), 252–260.Google Scholar
  48. Stacey, K. & MacGregor, M. (2001). Curriculum reform and approaches to algebra. In R. Lins (Ed.), Perspectives on school algebra (pp. 141–153). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  49. Swafford, J. & Langrall, C. (2000). Grade 6 Students’ preinstructional use of equations to describe and represent problem situations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(1), 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tanışlı, D. & Özdaş, A. (2009). The strategies of using the generalizing patterns of the primary school 5th grade students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 9(3), 1485–1497.Google Scholar
  51. Townsend, B. E. (2005). Examining secondary students’ algebraic reasoning: Flexibility and strategy use. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Columbia: University of Missouri.Google Scholar
  52. Weber, K. (2002). Students’ understanding of exponential and logarithmic functions. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED477690).Google Scholar
  53. Yesildere, S. &Akkoç, H. (2009). Investigating pre-service mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of number patterns. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou & C. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 401–408). Thessaloniki, Greece.Google Scholar
  54. Yesildere, S. & Akkoç, H. (2010). Algebraic generalization strategies of number patterns used by pre-service elementary mathematics teachers. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1142–1147.Google Scholar
  55. Zazkis, R. & Liljedahl, P. (2002). Generalization of patterns: The tension between algebraic thinking and algebraic notation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(3), 379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mathematics EducationKuwait UniversityKuwaitKuwait

Personalised recommendations