# Algebraic Generalization Strategies Used by Kuwaiti Pre-service Teachers

## Abstract

This study reports on the algebraic generalization strategies used by elementary and middle/high school pre-service mathematics teachers in Kuwait. They were presented with 9 tasks that involved linear, exponential, and quadratic situations. The results showed that these pre-service teachers had difficulty in generalizing algebraic rules in all 3 types of tasks. The most difficult problems were those involving exponents; they seemed to confuse exponential growth with the multiplication of *n*. Although they used several strategies such as explicit, recursive, and chunking, they tended to rely on explicit reasoning. They saw the explicit rule as a quick and easy rule to be used. In order to improve students’ understanding of algebraic reasoning, we must improve the understating of generalization. Teachers’ programs should put more emphasis on the type of content that teachers need to learn rather than on how much mathematics credits teachers need.

## Keywords

Algebraic reasoning Generalization Teacher education International study## Notes

### Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Kuwait University, research project no. [TT01/12].

## References

- Alajmi, A. (2009). Addressing computational estimation in the Kuwaiti curriculum: Teachers’ views.
*Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12*(4), 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Alajmi, A. (2012). How do elementary textbooks address fractions? A review of mathematics textbooks in the USA, Japan, and Kuwait.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79*(2), 239–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Alajmi, A. & Reys, R. (2010). Eighth grade Kuwaiti students’ performance in recognizing reasonable answers and strategies they use to determine reasonable answers.
*International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8*(1), 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Australian Education Council (1994).
*Mathematics: A curriculum profile for Australian schools*. Carlton, MN: Curriculum Corporation.Google Scholar - Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H. & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?
*Journal of Teacher Education, 59*(5), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Barbosa, A., Vale, I. & Palhares, P. (2012). Pattern tasks: Thinking processes used by 6th grade students.
*Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, 15*(3), 73–293.Google Scholar - Becker, J. R. & Rivera, F. (2005). Generalization strategies of beginning high school algebra students. In H. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(Vol. 4, pp. 121–128). Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne.Google Scholar - Bednarz, N., Kieran, C., & Lee, L. (Eds.). (1996).
*Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching*. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar - Billings, E. (2008). Exploring generalizations through growth patterns. In C. E. Greenes & R. Rubenstein (Eds.),
*Algebra and algebraic thinking in school mathematics: Seventieth yearbook*(pp. 279–293). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar - Bishop, J.W. (1997).
*Middle school students’ understanding of mathematical patterns and their symbolic representations*. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar - Carraher, D.W., Martinez, M.V., & Schliemann, A.D. (2008). Early algebra and mathematician generalization.
*ZDM Mathematics Education, 40*(1), 3–22.Google Scholar - Carraher, D. W. & Schliemann, A. D. (2007). Early algebra and algebraic reasoning. In F. Lester (Ed.),
*Handbook of research in mathematics education*(pp. 669–705). Greenwich, England: Information Age.Google Scholar - Chua, B. & Hoyles, C. (2012, July). Seeing through students’ eyes: The best-help strategy for pattern generalization. Paper presented at 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME-12), Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
- Confrey, J. & Smith, E. (1995). Splitting, covariation, and their role in the development of exponential functions.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26*(1), 66–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Department of Education and Skills (2001).
*Frameworks for teaching mathematics: Years 7, 8, and 9*. London, England: DFES Publications.Google Scholar - Dienes, Z. P. (1961). On abstraction and generalization.
*Harvard Education Review, 3*, 289–301.Google Scholar - Ebersbach, M. & Wilkening, F. (2007). Children’s intuitive mathematics: The development of knowledge about nonlinear growth.
*Child Development, 78*, 296–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ellis, A. B. (2007). A taxonomy for categorizing generalizations: Generalizing actions and reflection generalizations.
*The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16*, 221–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ellis, A. B. (2011). Generalizing-promoting actions: How classroom collaborations can support students’ mathematical generalizations.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42*(4), 308–345.Google Scholar - English, L. D. & Warren, E. A. (1995). General reasoning processes and elementary algebraic understanding: Implications for instruction.
*Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 17*(4), 1–19.Google Scholar - English, L. D. & Warren, E. A. (1998). Introducing the variable through pattern exploration.
*The Mathematics Teacher, 91*, 166–170.Google Scholar - Güner, P., Ersoy, E. & Temiz, T. (2013). 7th and 8th grade students’ generalization strategies of patterns.
*International Journal of Global Education, 2*(4), 38–54.Google Scholar - Hallagan, J., Rule, A. & Carlson, L. (2009). Elementary school pre-service teachers’ understanding of algebraic generalizations.
*The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 6*(1&2), 201–206.Google Scholar - Harel, G. & Tall, D. (1991). The general, the abstract and the generic in advanced mathematics.
*For the Learning of Mathematics, 11*, 38–42.Google Scholar - Healy, L. & Hoyles, C. (1999). Visual and symbolic reasoning in mathematics: Making connections with computers?
*Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1*(1), 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kaput, J. (1999). Teaching and learning a new algebra. In E. Fennema & T. Romberg (Eds.),
*Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding*(pp. 133–155). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Kaput, J. (2008). What is algebra? What is algebraic reasoning? In J. Kaput, D. Carraher & M. Blanton (Eds.),
*Algebra in the early grades*(pp. 5–17). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Kaput, J., Carraher, D. & Blanton, M. (Eds.). (2008).
*Algebra in the early grades*. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Kieran, C. (2007). Learning and teaching algebra at the middle school through college levels. In F. K. Lester (Ed.),
*Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning*(pp. 707–762). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar - Lannin, J. K. (2005). Generalization and justification: The challenge of introducing algebraic reasoning through patterning.
*Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7*(3), 231–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lannin, J. K., Barker, D. D. & Townsend, B. E. (2006). Algebraic generalization strategies: Factors influencing student strategy use.
*Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18*(3), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lee, L. (1996). Initiation into algebraic culture: Generalization. In L. Lee (Ed.),
*Approaches to algebra: Perspective for research and teaching*(pp. 87–106). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar - Lee, L. & Wheeler, D. (1987).
*Algebraic thinking in high school students: Their conceptions of generalization and justification, research report*. Montreal, Canada: Concordia University.Google Scholar - Marjanovic, M. M. & Zeljic, M. (2013). Algebra as a tool for structuring number systems.
*The Teaching of Mathematics, 16*(2), 47–66.Google Scholar - Mason, J. (1996). Expressing generality and roots of algebra. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran & L. Lee (Eds.),
*Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching*(pp. 65–86). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar - Moss, J., Beatty, R., McNab, S.L., & Eisenband, J. (2006).
*The potential of geometric sequences to foster young students’ ability to generalize in mathematics*. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar - National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000).
*Principles and standards for school mathematics*. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar - National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers (2010).
*Common core state standards for mathematics.*Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf. - Noss, R., Healy, L. & Hoyles, C. (1997). The construction of mathematical meanings: connecting the visual with the symbolic.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33*(2), 202–233.Google Scholar - Orton, J., Orton, A. & Roper, T. (1999). Pictorial and practical contexts and the perception of pattern. In A. Orton (Ed.),
*Pattern in the teaching and learning of mathematics*(pp. 121–136). London, England: Cassel Wellington House.Google Scholar - Reid, D. (2002). Conjectures and refutations in grade 5 mathematics.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33*(1), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Rivera, F. (2007). Visualizing as a mathematical way of knowing: Understanding figural generalization.
*Mathematics Teacher, 101*(1), 69–75.Google Scholar - Rivera, F. D. & Becker, J. R. (2003). The effects of numerical and figural cues on the induction processes of preservice elementary mathematics teachers. In N. Pateman, B. Dougherty & J. Zilliox (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 2003 Joint Meeting of PME and PMENA*(Vol. 4, pp. 63–70). Honolulu: University of Hawaii.Google Scholar - Rivera, F. D. & Becker, J. R. (2005). Figural and numerical modes of generalizing in algebra.
*Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 11*(4), 198–203.Google Scholar - Schifter, D., Monk, S., Russell, S. J. & Bastable, V. (2008). Early algebra: What does understanding the laws of arithmetic mean in the elementary grades? In J. Kaput, D. Carraher & M. Blanton (Eds.),
*Algebra in the early grades*(pp. 413–447). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Stacey, K. (1989). Finding and using patterns in linear generalizing problems.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20*, 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Stacey, K. & MacGregor, M. (1997). Building foundations for algebra.
*Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 2*(4), 252–260.Google Scholar - Stacey, K. & MacGregor, M. (2001). Curriculum reform and approaches to algebra. In R. Lins (Ed.),
*Perspectives on school algebra*(pp. 141–153). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar - Swafford, J. & Langrall, C. (2000). Grade 6 Students’ preinstructional use of equations to describe and represent problem situations.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31*(1), 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Tanışlı, D. & Özdaş, A. (2009). The strategies of using the generalizing patterns of the primary school 5th grade students.
*Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 9*(3), 1485–1497.Google Scholar - Townsend, B. E. (2005).
*Examining secondary students’ algebraic reasoning: Flexibility and strategy use. Unpublished doctoral dissertation*. Columbia: University of Missouri.Google Scholar - Weber, K. (2002).
*Students’ understanding of exponential and logarithmic functions*. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED477690).Google Scholar - Yesildere, S. &Akkoç, H. (2009). Investigating pre-service mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of number patterns. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou & C. Sakonidis (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(Vol. 1, pp. 401–408). Thessaloniki, Greece.Google Scholar - Yesildere, S. & Akkoç, H. (2010). Algebraic generalization strategies of number patterns used by pre-service elementary mathematics teachers.
*Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences*,*2*(2), 1142–1147.Google Scholar - Zazkis, R. & Liljedahl, P. (2002). Generalization of patterns: The tension between algebraic thinking and algebraic notation.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49*(3), 379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar