Teaching for Creativity by Science Teachers in Grades 5–10
- 833 Downloads
This classroom observation study explored how science teachers (N = 22) teach for creativity in grades 5–10 in Oman. We designed an observation form with 4 main categories that targeted the instructional practices related to teaching for creativity: questioning strategy, teacher’s responses to students’ ideas, classroom activities to support creativity, and whole-lesson methods that foster creativity. An open-ended survey was also designed to explore participants’ justifications for their instructional decisions and practices. The findings indicate that the overall level of teaching for creativity was low and that participants’ performance was the highest for teacher’s responses to students’ ideas category and the lowest for classroom activities to support creativity category. We observed that a teacher-centered approach with instructional practices geared toward preparing students for examinations was dominant and that these science teachers were bound to the textbook, following cookbook-style activities. Participants believed that they did not have enough time to cover the content and teach for creativity and that they were not prepared to teach for creativity. Based on these findings, we recommend that programs be developed to prepare science teachers to teach for creativity.
KeywordsClassroom observation study Classroom practices Creativity Imagination Questioning strategy Science processes Students’ ideas Teacher’s responses
The authors would like to express their sincere appreciation to Dr. Larry Yore for his valuable academic editorial editing and to Shari Yore for her technical editing as part of a special editorial assistance coordinated by IJSME.
- Akerson, V. L., Townsend, J., Donnelly, L., Hanson, D., Tira, P. & White, O. (2009). Scientific modeling for inquiring teachers network (SMIT’N): The influence on elementary teachers’ views of nature of science, inquiry, and modeling. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Al-Balushi, S. M. (2009). Factors influencing pre-service science teachers' imagination at the microscopic level in chemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(6), 1089–1110. doi: 10.1007/s10763-009-9155-1.
- Bachelor, P. & Michael, W. (1997). The structure-of-intellect model revisited. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 155–182). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
- Belova, N., Eilks, I. & Feierabend, T. (2013). The evaluation of role-playing in the context of teaching climate change. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(1 Supplement), 165–190. doi: 10.1007/s10763-013-9477-x.
- Cheng, V. (2001). Enhancing creativity of elementary science teachers—A preliminary study. Asia Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 1–23.Google Scholar
- Choi, A., Klein, V. & Hershberger, S. (2014). Success, difficulty, and instructional strategy to enact an argument-based inquiry approach: Experiences of elementary teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. doi: 10.1007/s10763-014-9525-1.
- Craft, A. (2001). An analysis of research and literature on creativity in education. London, England: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. (2008). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Fasko, D. (2000). Education and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3), 317–327.Google Scholar
- Ferrari, A., Cachia, R. & Punie, Y. (2009). Innovation and creativity in education and training in the EU member states: Fostering creative learning and supporting innovative teaching. Luxembourg, Belgium: European Communities.Google Scholar
- Gardner, H. (2011). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Gay, L., Mills, G. & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational research competencies for analysis and applications (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Heinze, A. & Erhard, M. (2006). How much time do students have to think about teacher questions? An investigation of the quick succession of teacher questions and student responses in the German mathematics classroom. ZMD-International Journal on Mathematics Education, 38(5), 388–398.Google Scholar
- Ibrakovid, V. & Bognar, B. (2009). Creativity in teaching plant production. Educational Journal of Living Theories, 2(2), 232–256.Google Scholar
- Kukliansky, I., Shosberger, I. & Eshach, H. (2014). Science teachers’ voice on homework: Beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. doi: 10.1007/s10763-014-9555-8.
- Ministry of Education (2013). Assessing students’ learning in science in grades 5–10. Muscat, Oman: Author.Google Scholar
- National Research Council (2012). In H. Quinn, H. A. Schweingruber & T. Keller (Eds.), A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Peters, K. (2008). Guided imagery in the classroom. Journal of the Virginia Writing Project, 29, 12–16.Google Scholar
- Seo, H.-A., Lee, E. & Kim, K. (2005). Korean science teachers’ understanding of creativity in gifted education. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, XVI(2/3), 98–105.Google Scholar
- Starko, A. (2010). Creativity in the calssroom: Schools of curious delight (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Yager, S., Dogan, O., Hacieminoglu, E. & Yager, R. (2012). The role of student and teacher creativity in aiding current reform efforts in science and technology education. National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal, 25(3), 1–24.Google Scholar