CONTENT ANALYSIS OF 1998–2012 EMPIRICAL STUDIES IN SCIENCE READING USING A SELF-REGULATED LEARNING LENS
- 556 Downloads
There is an increasing interest in conducting reading-related studies in science education using a self-regulated learning (SRL) lens. This exploration involved a content analysis of 34 articles (38 studies in total) in highly regarded journals from 1998 to 2012 using an SRL interpretative framework to reveal critical features and relationships in the science reading research. A cross-study comparison revealed that most researchers had applied mixed methods approaches (68 %), used instructional cues as an intervention (47 %), and collected both performance and process data (50 %). The summary figures indicated that a variety of instructional cues had different effects on science reading and SRL strategies and that there were interactions between task conditions and cognitive conditions. Customized or personalized metacognitive prompts are especially useful for comprehending hypertexts and conducting online information searches. Based on the findings, it was suggested that future research should apply the COPES model for SRL to design instructional cues for learners and to investigate how external task conditions influence cognitive conditions, self-regulated processes, and reading performance across different science text genres.
KEY WORDScontent analysis metacognition science learning science reading self-regulated learning SRL
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Alexander, P. A. (1997). Mapping the multidimensional nature of domain learning: the interplay of cognitive, motivational, and strategic forces. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 213–250). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Duckworth, K., Akerman, R., MacGregor, A., Salter, E. & Vorhaus, J. (2009). Self-regulated learning: A literature review. London, England: Centre for Research on the Wider Benefits of Learning.Google Scholar
- National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Pieschl, S., Stahl, E. & Bromme, R. (2013). Adaptation to context as core component of self-regulated learning. The example of complexity and epistemic beliefs. In R. Azevedo & V. Aleven (Eds.), International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 53–65). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Shelley, M. C., II, Yore, L. D. & Hand, B. (2009). Education research meets the “gold standard”: Evaluation, research methods, and statistics after No Child Left Behind. In M. C. Shelley II, L. D. Yore & B. Hand (Eds.), Quality research in literacy and science education: International perspectives and gold standards (pp. 3–15). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
- Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In J. P. Mestre & B. H. Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Cognition in education (pp. 37–76). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Winne, P. H. & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Winne, P. H. & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–568). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Yore, L. D., Francis Pelton, L., Neill, B. W., Pelton, T. W., Anderson, J. O. & Milford, T. M. (2014). Closing the science, mathematics, and reading gaps from a Canadian perspective: Implications for STEM mainstream and pipeline literacy. In J. V. Clark (Ed.), Closing the achievement gap from an international perspective (pp. 73–104). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
- Yore, L. D. & Tippett, C. D. (2014). Reading science. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of science education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-6165-0_130-2.
- Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Achieving academic excellence: A self-regulatory perspective. In M. Ferrari (Ed.), The pursuit of excellence through education (pp. 85–110). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar