SCIENTISTS TALKING TO STUDENTS THROUGH VIDEOS
The benefits of connecting school students with scientists are well documented. This paper reports how New Zealand teachers brought scientists into the classrooms through the use of videos of New Zealand scientists talking about themselves and their research. Two researchers observed lessons in 9 different classrooms in which 23 educational videos were shown to students from years 2 to 11 (aged 6–17 years). Seven groups of primary students and 4 groups of secondary students participated in interviews after classroom observations. Eight additional secondary teachers participated in 7 focus group discussions; 4 additional primary teachers participated in 1 focus group discussion. Data were analysed thematically using an inductive approach. This analysis uncovered 4 major functions for the use of videos of scientists talking about their work: bringing scientists into the classroom, scientists talking about science with local relevance, scientists explaining concepts using a multitude of modes and scientists as authentic alternative authorities within the classroom. Taken together, the findings demonstrate that the use of video clips of scientists talking about their work can be an effective and efficient way of engaging students in learning about science and scientists.
Key wordsclassroom research educational technology image of scientist science education video
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Aikenhead, G., Orpwood, G. & Fensham, P. (2011). Scientific literacy for a knowledge society. In C. Linder, L. Ostman, D. Roberts, P. O. Wickman, G. Erickson & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 28–44). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bolstad, R. & Hipkins, R. (2008). Seeing yourself in science—The importance of the middle school years. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
- Chen, J., Cowie, B. & Oliver, K. (2011). Reading to learn about New Zealand birds in a primary science classroom. New Zealand Science Teacher, 129, 31–33.Google Scholar
- Chen, J., & Cowie, B. (2012). A butterfly story: Being a citizen scientist. New Zealand ScienceTeacher, 130, 34–37.Google Scholar
- Cooper, B., Cowie, B. & Jones, A. (2010). Connecting teachers and students with science and scientists: The Science Leaning Hub. Science Education International, 21(2), 92–101.Google Scholar
- Demirba, M. (2009). The relationships between the scientist perception and scientific attitudes of science teacher candidates in Turkey: A case study. Scientific Research and Essay, 4(6), 565–576.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. (2005). Why women shy away from careers in science and math. Retrieved from http://www.umich.edu/news/index.html?Releases/2005/Apr05/r041405. Accessed 2 Aug 2012.
- Fasse, B. B. & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Evaluating classroom practices using qualitative methods: Defining and refining the process. Paper presented at the International Conference of Learning Sciences, Australia.Google Scholar
- Feldman, A., Divoll, K. & Rogan, A. (2007). Research education of new scientists: Implications for science teacher education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
- Fensham, P. (2009). Teaching science to achieve scientific literacy. In R. Bybee & B. McCrae (Eds.), OISA science 2006: Implications for science teachers and teaching (pp. 187–202). New Orleans, USA: National Science Teachers Association.Google Scholar
- Gluckman, P. (2011). Looking ahead: Science education for the 21st century. Retrieved from http://www.pmcsa.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/Looking-ahead-Science-education-for-the-twenty-first-century.pdf. Accessed 2 Aug 2012.
- Harlen, W. (2008). Science as a key component of the primary curriculum: A rationale with policy implications. Retrieved from http://wellcome.ac.uk/perspectives. Accessed 2 Aug 2012.
- Kearney, M. (2002). Using digital video to enhance authentic technology-mediated learning in science classrooms. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Council for Computers in Education, Hobart, Australia.Google Scholar
- Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J. & Tsatsarelius, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetoric of the science classroom. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
- Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Education (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.Google Scholar
- Moreland, J., Cowie, B., Otrel-Cass, K. & Jones, A. (2010). Planning for learning: Building knowledge for teaching primary science and technology. Wellington, New Zealand: Teaching and Learning Research Initiative.Google Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Volume 1: Analysis. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
- Osborne, J. & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London: Nuffield Foundation.Google Scholar
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Rennie, L. J. (2012). A very valuable partnership: Evaluation of the Scientists in Schools Project 2011–12. Dickson, ACT: CSIRO Education.Google Scholar
- Tytler, R., Osborne, J. F., Williams, G., Tytler, K. & Clark, C. J. (2008). Opening up pathways: Engagement in STEM across the school transition. Canberra: Commissioned by the Australian Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.Google Scholar