Advertisement

PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS’ CHALLENGES IN TEACHING REASONING-AND-PROVING

  • Gabriel J. StylianidesEmail author
  • Andreas J. Stylianides
  • Leah N. Shilling-Traina
Article

Abstract

The activity of reasoning-and-proving is at the heart of mathematical sense making and is important for all students’ learning as early as the elementary grades. Yet, reasoning-and-proving tends to have a marginal place in elementary school classrooms. This situation can be partly attributed to the fact that many (prospective) elementary teachers have (1) weak mathematical (subject matter) knowledge about reasoning-and-proving and (2) counterproductive beliefs about its teaching. Following up on an intervention study that helped a group of prospective elementary teachers make significant progress in overcoming these two major obstacles to teaching reasoning-and-proving, we examined the challenges that three of them identified that they faced as they planned and taught lessons related to reasoning-and-proving in their mentor teachers’ classrooms. Our findings contribute to research knowledge about major factors (other than the well-known factors related to teachers’ mathematical knowledge and beliefs) that deserve attention by teacher education programs in preparing prospective teachers to teach reasoning-and-proving.

Key words

elementary school mathematical reasoning mathematics teaching proof prospective teachers teacher education 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balacheff, N. (2002/2004). The researcher epistemology: A deadlock for educational research on proof. In F.L. Lin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Mathematics: Understanding Proving and Proving to Understand (pp. 23–44). Taipei: NSC and NTNU. Reprinted in Les cahiers du laboratoire Leibniz, no. 109, August 2004. Retrieved 18 January 2006 from http://www-leibniz.imag.fr/NEWLEIBNIZ/LesCahiers/Cahier109/ResumCahier109.html.
  2. Ball, D. L. & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 83–104). Westport, CT: Alex.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, D. L. & Bass, H. (2003). Making mathematics reasonable in school. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 27–44). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  4. Bieda, K. N. (2010). Enacting proof-related tasks in middle school mathematics: Challenges and opportunities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 351–382.Google Scholar
  5. Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C., Underhill, R., Jones, D. & Agard, P. C. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(3), 194–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L. & Levi, L. (2003). Thinking mathematically: Integrating arithmetic and algebra in the elementary school. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  7. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R. & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32, 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crespo, S. (2000). Seeing more than right and wrong answers: Prospective teachers’ interpretations of students’ mathematical work. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 155–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis, R. B. & McKnight, C. (1976). Conceptual, heuristic, and S-algorithmic approaches in mathematics teaching. Journal of Children’s Mathematical Behavior, 1, 271–286.Google Scholar
  10. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: Heath.Google Scholar
  11. Doyle, W. (1988). Work in mathematics classes: The context of students’ thinking during instruction. Educational Psychologist, 23, 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Even, R. & Ball, D. L. (Eds.). (2009). The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics: The 15th ICMI Study. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Frykholm, J. (1996). Pre-service teachers in mathematics: Struggling with the standards. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(6), 665–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gellert, U. (2000). Mathematics instruction in safe space: Prospective elementary teachers’ views of mathematics education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 251–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giebelhaus, C. R. & Bowman, C. L. (2002). Teaching mentors: Is it worth the effort? The Journal of Educational Research, 95(4), 246–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  17. Goulding, M., Rowland, T. & Barber, P. (2002). Does it matter? Primary teacher trainees’ subject knowledge in mathematics. British Educational Research Journal, 28, 689–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hagger, H. & McIntyre, D. (2000). What can research tell us about teacher education? Oxford Review of Education, 26, 483–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harel, G. & Sowder, L. (2007). Toward comprehensive perspectives on the learning and teaching of proof. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 805–842). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Heaton, R.M. (2000). Teaching mathematics to the new standards: Relearning the dance. Practitioner inquiry series.Google Scholar
  21. Henningsen, M. & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 524–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J., Chui, A. M., Wearne, D., Smith, M., Kersting, N., Manaster, A., Tseng, E., Etterbeek, W., Manaster, C., Gonzales, P. & Stigler, J. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study. NCES 2003-013. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.Google Scholar
  23. Hill, H. C., Rowan, B. & Ball, D. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 371–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hogan, T., Rabinowitz, M. & Craven, J., III. (2003). Representation in teaching: Inferences from research of expert and novice teachers. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kagan, D. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62(2), 129–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Knuth, E. J. (2002). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33, 379–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 29–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lampert, M. (1992). Practices and problems in teaching authentic mathematics. In F. K. Oser, A. Dick & J. Patry (Eds.), Effective and responsible teaching: The new synthesis (pp. 295–314). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Lampert, M. & Ball, D. L. (1999). Aligning teacher education with contemporary K-12 reform visions. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 33–53). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  30. Learning Mathematics for Teaching Project (2011). Measuring the mathematical quality of instruction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leinhardt, G. & Smith, D. A. (1985). Expertise in mathematics instruction: Subject matter knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 247–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lin, F.L. & Ponte, J.P. (2008). Face-to-face learning communities of prospective mathematics teachers: Studies on their professional growth. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), Participants in mathematics teacher education: Individuals, teams, communities and networks (pp. 111–129). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Manaster, A. B. (1998). Some characteristics of eighth grade mathematics classes in the TIMSS videotape study. The American Mathematical Monthly, 105(9), 793–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martin, W. G. & Harel, G. (1989). Proof frames of preservice elementary teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mason, J., Burton, L. & Stacey, K. (1982). Thinking mathematically. London: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  36. McDuffie, A. R. (2004). Mathematics teaching as a deliberate practice: An investigation of elementary pre-service teachers’ reflective thinking during student teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 33–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  38. Mewborn, D. S. (1999). Reflective thinking among preservice elementary mathematics teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 316–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morris, A. K. (2002). Mathematical reasoning: Adults’ ability to make the inductive-deductive distinction. Cognition and Instruction, 20(1), 79–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. NTCM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics) (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  41. Pintrich, P., Marx, R. & Boyle, R. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ponte, J. P. & Chapman, O. (2008). Preservice mathematics teachers’ knowledge and development. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 223–261). New York: Routldge.Google Scholar
  43. Reid, D. A. (2002). Conjectures and refutations in grade 5 mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33, 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rowland, T., Huckstep, T. & Thwaites, A. (2005). Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: The knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 255–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schoenfeld, A. H. (Ed.). (1983). Problem solving in the mathematics curriculum: A report, recommendations, and an annotated bibliography. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar
  46. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1994). What do we know about mathematics curricula? The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 13, 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  48. Shilling, L. (2010). An exploration of pre-service elementary teachers’ mathematical beliefs. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  49. Shilling-Traina, L. N. & Stylianides, G. J. (2013). Impacting prospective teachers’ beliefs about mathematics. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(3). doi: 10.1007/s11858-012-0461-7.
  50. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Simon, M. A. & Blume, G. W. (1996). Justification in the mathematics classroom: A study of prospective elementary teachers. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S. & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stylianides, A. J. (2007). Proof and proving in school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 289–321.Google Scholar
  54. Stylianides, G. J. (2008). An analytic framework of reasoning-and-proving. For the Learning of Mathematics, 28(1), 9–16.Google Scholar
  55. Stylianides, A. J. & Ball, D. L. (2008). Understanding and describing mathematical knowledge for teaching: Knowledge about proof for engaging students in the activity of proving. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 307–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stylianides, A. J. & Stylianides, G. J. (2008a). Studying the implementation of tasks in classroom settings: High-level mathematics tasks embedded in real-life contexts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(4), 859–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stylianides, G. J. & Stylianides, A. J. (2008b). Proof in school mathematics: Insights from psychological research into students’ ability for deductive reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10, 103–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stylianides, A. J. & Stylianides, G. J. (2009a). Proof constructions and evaluations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72, 237–253.Google Scholar
  59. Stylianides, G. J. & Stylianides, A. J. (2009b). Facilitating the transition from empirical arguments to proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(3), 314–352.Google Scholar
  60. Stylianides, G. J. & Stylianides, A. J. (2010). Mathematics for teaching: A form of applied mathematics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 161–172.Google Scholar
  61. Sullivan, P. & Mousley, J. (2001). Thinking teaching: Seeing mathematics teachers as active decision makers. In F. L. Lin & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 147–164). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Swars, S., Smith, S., Smith, M. & Hart, L. (2009). A longitudinal study of effects of a developmental teacher preparation program on elementary prospective teachers’ mathematics beliefs. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 21, 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Verschaffel, L., Greer, B. & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  64. Walshaw, M. (2004). Pre-service mathematics teaching in the context of schools: An exploration into the constitution of identity. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yackel, E. & Hanna, G. (2003). Reasoning and proof. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 227–236). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  66. Zack, V. (1997). “You have to prove us wrong”: Proof at the elementary school level. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, vol. 4 (pp. 291–298). Lahti, Finland: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriel J. Stylianides
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andreas J. Stylianides
    • 2
  • Leah N. Shilling-Traina
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EducationUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  3. 3.Department of Mathematics and Computer ScienceLongwood UniversityFarmvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations