# MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ CONCEPTIONS OF PROOF: IMPLICATIONS FOR EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

- 516 Downloads
- 8 Citations

## ABSTRACT

Current mathematics education reforms devoted to reasoning and proof highlight its importance in pre-kindergarten through grade 12. In order to provide students with opportunities to experience and understand proof, mathematics teachers must have a solid understanding of proofs themselves. In light of this challenge, a growing number of researchers around the world have started to investigate mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof; however, much more needs to be done. Drawing on lessons learned from research and curricular recommendations from around the world, the main purpose of this paper is to review the literature on elementary and secondary mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof and discuss international implications.

## KEY WORDS

educational research mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof proof teacher education## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## REFERENCES

- Alibert, D. & Thomas, M. (1991). Research on mathematical proof. In D. Tall (Ed.),
*Advanced mathematical thinking*(pp. 215–230). The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar - Balacheff, N. (1991). Treatment of refutations: Aspects of the complexity of a constructivist approach to mathematics learning. In E. von Glasersfeld (Ed.),
*Radical constructivism in mathematics education*(pp. 89–110). The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar - Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H. & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?
*Journal of Teacher Education, 59*(5), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Barkai, R., Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D. & Dreyfus, T. (2002). Proving or refuting arithmetic claims: The case of elementary school teachers. In A. D. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(vol. 2, pp. 57–64), Norwich, UK.Google Scholar - Bell, A. (1976). A study of pupils’ proof-explanations in mathematical situations.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 7*, 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bieda, K., Holden, C. & Knuth, E. (2006). Does proof prove? Students’ emerging beliefs about generality and proof in middle school. In S. Alatorre, J. Cortina, M. Sáiz, & A. Méndez (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the Twenty-eighth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(vol. 2, pp. 395–402), Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, México.Google Scholar - Blanton, M., Stylianou, D. A. & David, M. M. (2009). Understanding instructional scaffolding in classroom discourse on proof. In D. Stylianou, M. Blanton & E. Knuth (Eds.),
*Teaching and learning proof across the grades: A K-16 perspective*(pp. 290–306). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar - Carpenter, T. & Franke, M. (2001). Developing algebraic reasoning in the elementary school: Generalization and proof. In H. Chick, K. Stacey, J. Vincent & J. Vincent (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the Twelfth International Commission on Mathematical Instruction*(vol. 1, pp. 155–162), University of Melbourne, Melbourne.Google Scholar - Chazan, D. (1993). High school students’ justification for their views of empirical evidence and mathematical proof.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24*(4), 359–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Coe, R. & Ruthven, K. (1994). Proof practices and constructs of advanced mathematics students.
*British Educational Research Journal, 20*, 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - De Villiers, M. (1999).
*Rethinking proof with the geometers’ sketchpad*. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum.Google Scholar - Dickerson, D. (2006). Aspects of preservice teachers’ understandings of the purposes of mathematical proof. In S. Alatorre, J. Cortina, M. Sáiz & A. Méndez (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the Twenty-eighth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(vol. 2, pp. 710–716). Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, México.Google Scholar - Dickerson, D. S. (2008).
*High school mathematics teachers’ understandings of the purposes of mathematical proof*. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, Syracuse.Google Scholar - Dreyfus, T. (1999). Why Johnny can’t prove.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38*(1), 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Fawcett, H. P. (1938).
*The nature of proof (1938 yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics)*. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teacher College, Columbia University.Google Scholar - Gholamazad, S., Liljedahl, P. & Zazkis, R. (2004). What counts as proof? Investigation of pre-service elementary teachers’ evaluation of presented ‘proofs’. In D. E. McDougall & J. O. Ross (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(vol. 2, pp. 639–646), University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar - Goetting, M. (1995).
*The college students’ understanding of mathematical proof*. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, Maryland.Google Scholar - Hanna, G. (1991). Mathematical proof. In D. Tall (Ed.),
*Advanced mathematical thinking*(pp. 54–61). The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar - Hanna, G. (1995). Challenges to the importance of proof.
*For the Learning of Mathematics, 15*(3), 42–49.Google Scholar - Hanna, G. (2000). Proof, explanation and exploration: An overview.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44*, 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Harel, G. & Sowder, L. (2007). Toward comprehensive perspectives on the learning and teaching of proof. In F. K. Lester (Ed.),
*Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning*(pp. 805–842). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar - Hart, E. (1994). A conceptual analysis of the proof-writing performance of expert and novice students in elementary group theory. In J. Kaput & E. Dubinsky (Eds.),
*Research issues in undergraduate math learning: Preliminary analyses and results: MAA notes number 33*(pp. 49–62). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar - Healy, L. & Hoyles, C. (2000). A study of proof conceptions in algebra.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31*(4), 396–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Herbst, P. (2002). Engaging students in proving: A double bind on the teacher.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33*, 176–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hersh, R. (1993). Proving is convincing and explaining.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24*, 389–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Jones, K. (1997). Student teachers’ conceptions of mathematical proof.
*Mathematics Education Review, 9*, 21–32.Google Scholar - Knuth, E. (1999).
*The nature of secondary school mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof*. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, Colorado.Google Scholar - Knuth, E. (2002a). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33*(5), 379–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Knuth, E. (2002b). Teachers’ conceptions of proof in the context of secondary school mathematics.
*Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5*, 61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Knuth, E. & Elliott, R. (1997). Preservice secondary mathematics teachers’ interpretations of mathematical proof. In J. A. Dossey, J. O. Swafford, M. Parmantie & A. E. Dossey (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(vol. 2, pp. 545–552), Illinois State University, Illinois.Google Scholar - Knuth, E., Choppin, J., Slaughter, M. & Sutherland, J. (2002). Mapping the conceptual terrain of middle school students’ competencies in justifying and proving. In D. Mewborn, P. Sztajn, D. White, H. Wiegel, R. Bryant & K. Noony (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(vol. 4, pp. 1693–1670), University of Georgia, Athens.Google Scholar - Ko, Y. Y. & Knuth, E. (2009). Undergraduate mathematics majors’ writing performance producing proofs and counterexamples about continuous functions.
*Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28*(1), 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching.
*American Educational Research Journal, 27*(1), 29–63.Google Scholar - Lin, F. L., Yang, K. L. & Chen, C. Y. (2004). The features and relationships of reasoning, proving, and understanding proof in number patterns.
*International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2*, 227–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Maher, C. & Martino, A. (1996). The development of the idea of mathematical proof: A 5-year case study.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27*, 194–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Martin, G. & Harel, G. (1989). Proof frames of preservice elementary teachers.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20*, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Martin, T. S., McCrone, S. M. S., Bower, M. L. W. & Dindyal, J. (2005). The interplay of teacher and student actions in the teaching and learning of geometric proof.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60*, 95–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mingus, T. & Grassl, R. (1999). Preservice teacher beliefs about proofs.
*School Science and Mathematics, 99*(8), 438–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Moore, R. C. (1994). Making the transition to formal proof.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27*, 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Morris, A. K. (2002). Mathematical reasoning: Adults’ ability to make the inductive-deductive distinction.
*Cognition and Instruction, 20*(1), 79–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Movshovitz-Hadar, N. (1993). The false coin problem, mathematical induction and knowledge fragility.
*Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 12*, 253–268.Google Scholar - National Council of Teacher of Mathematics (2000).
*Principles and standard for school mathematics*. Reston, VA: National Council of Teacher of Mathematics.Google Scholar - Riley, K. J. (2003).
*An investigation of prospective secondary mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof and refutations*. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Montana State University, Bozeman.Google Scholar - Senk, S. L. (1985). How well do students write geometry proofs?
*Mathematics Teacher, 78*(6), 448–456.Google Scholar - Selden, A. & Selden, J. (1995). Unpacking the logic of mathematical statements.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29*, 123–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Selden, A. & Selden, J. (2003). Validations of proofs considered as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem?
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34*(1), 4–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Smith, J. C., Nichols, S. R., Yoo, S. & Oehler, K. (2009). Building a community of inquiry in a problem-based undergraduate number theory course. In D. Stylianou, M. Blanton & E. Knuth (Eds.),
*Teaching and learning proof across the grades: A K-16 perspective*(pp. 307–322). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar - Stylianides, A. J. (2007). Proof and proving in school mathematics.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38*(3), 289–321.Google Scholar - Stylianides, A. J. & Stylianides, G. J. (2009). Proof constructions and evaluations.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72*(2), 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J. & Philippou, G. N. (2004). Undergraduate students’ understanding of the contraposition equivalence rule in symbolic and verbal contexts.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55*, 133–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J. & Philippou, G. N. (2007). Preservice teachers’ knowledge of proof by mathematical induction.
*Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10*, 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Tall, D. (1989). The nature of mathematical proof.
*Mathematics Teaching, 127*, 28–32.Google Scholar - Tall, D. (1992). The transition to advanced mathematical thinking: Functions, limits, infinity, and proof. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.),
*Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning*(pp. 495–511). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar - Thompson, D. (1996). Learning and teaching indirect proof.
*The Mathematics Teacher, 89*(6), 474–482.Google Scholar - Varghese, T. (2007).
*Student teachers’ conceptions of mathematical proof*. Unpublished master thesis, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar - Weber, K. (2001). Student difficulty in constructing proofs: The need for strategic knowledge.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48*(1), 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Weber, K. (2004). Traditional instruction in advanced mathematics courses: A case study of one professor’s lectures and proofs in an introductory real analysis course.
*Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23*, 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Weber, K. (2008). How mathematicians determine if an argument is a valid proof.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39*, 431–459.Google Scholar - Yackel, E. & Hanna, G. (2003). Reasoning and proof. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin & D. Schifter (Eds.),
*A research companion to principles and standards to school mathematics*. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar - Yandell, B. H. (2002).
*The honors class: Hilbert’s problems and their solvers*. Natick, MA: A. K. Peters.Google Scholar