Advertisement

FIRST CYCLE OF PISA (2000–2006)—INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON SUCCESSES AND CHALLENGES: RESEARCH AND POLICY DIRECTIONS

  • John O. AndersonEmail author
  • Mei-Hung Chiu
  • Larry D. Yore
Article

ABSTRACT

This special edition of IJMSE focuses on the Programme of International Student Assessment (PISA) project now that it has completed a full cycle of administration—reading, mathematics, and science—to look at ways in which PISA has been used in participating countries and with what consequences, and to identify potential research and policy directions emanating from this initiative. Articles were invited to (a) reflect international perspectives on the uses and consequences of PISA to date and (b) speculate on future directions for research, curriculum, and policy using the PISA datasets. The introductory article provides a brief overview of common aspects of PISA: Evolving definitions of reading literacy, mathematics literacy, and science literacy; technical design of the instruments and data analysis procedures; the changing emphasis of administrations; and recent research using the datasets. PISA, unlike other international assessments in reading, mathematics, and science, has provided a fresh perspective on ‘what might be’ by decoupling the assessment from mandated curricula to focus on literacies needed for a 21st century economy. This unique feature of PISA brings with it possibilities and cautions for policy makers.

KEY WORDS

contemporary literacies hierarchical linear modelling policy directions Programme of International Student Assessment (PISA) secondary analyses technical aspects 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Anderson, J. O., Lin, H.-S., Treagust, D. F., Ross, S. P., & Yore, L. D. (2007). Using large-scale assessment datasets for research in science and mathematics education: Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 591–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. O., Milford, T., & Ross, S. P. (2009). Multilevel modeling with HLM: Taking a second look at PISA. In M. C. Shelley II, L. D. Yore, & B. Hand (Eds.), Quality research in literacy and science education: International perspectives and gold standards (pp. 263–286). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bybee, R., Fensham, P. J., & Laurie, R. (2009). Scientific literacy and contexts in PISA 2006 science [Editorial]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 862–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fensham, P. J. (2009). The link between policy and practice in science education: The role of research. Science Education, 93(6), 1076–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gu, Z. (2006). Students’ beliefs about themselves, learning environment at school, and achievement. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  6. Hsu, J. C. (2007). Comparing the relationships between mathematics achievement and student characteristics in Canada and Hong Kong through HLM. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  7. Lavonen, J., & Laaksonen, S. (2009). Context of teaching and learning school science in Finland: Reflections on PISA 2006 results. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 922–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Milford, T. (2009). An investigation of international science achievement using the OECD’s PISA 2006 dataset. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  9. Moje, E. B. (2008). Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(2), 96–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1999). Measuring student knowledge and skills: A new framework for assessment. Paris: Author.Google Scholar
  12. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2000). Measuring student knowledge and skills: The PISA 2000 assessment of reading, mathematical and scientific literacy. Paris: Author.Google Scholar
  13. Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework: Mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills. Paris: Author.Google Scholar
  14. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2005). PISA 2003 data analysis manuals. Paris: Author.Google Scholar
  15. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Paris: Author.Google Scholar
  16. Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (2007a). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world (vol. 1: Analysis). Paris: Author.Google Scholar
  17. Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (2007b). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world (Executive summary). Paris: Author.Google Scholar
  18. Ram, A. (2007). A multilevel analysis of mathematics literacy in Canada and Japan: The effects of sex differences, teacher support, and the school learning environment. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  19. Ross, S. P. (2008). Motivation correlates of academic achievement: Exploring how motivation influences academic achievement in the PISA 2003 dataset. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  20. Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 909–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–61.Google Scholar
  22. Yore, L. D., Pimm, D., & Tuan, H.-L. (2007). The literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 559–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • John O. Anderson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mei-Hung Chiu
    • 2
  • Larry D. Yore
    • 1
  1. 1.University of VictoriaVictoriaCanada
  2. 2.National Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations