Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

REFUTATION TEXT IN SCIENCE EDUCATION: A REVIEW OF TWO DECADES OF RESEARCH

ABSTRACT

As people attempt to make sense of the world, they develop personal knowledge structures. These structures often contain misconceptions—inaccurate or incomplete information—that are highly resistant to change because existing knowledge networks must be restructured to accommodate counterintuitive information in a process known as conceptual change. Since textbooks are the dominant resource for science instruction in most classrooms, text-based methods of facilitating conceptual change need to be examined. Since the mid-1980 s, researchers have investigated the conceptual change potential of refutation text, a text structure that includes elements of argumentation and that has been described as one of the most effective text-based means for modifying readers’ misconceptions. In this paper, twenty years of refutation text research in science and reading education is reviewed and then a secondary analysis of those results is conducted to explore developmental aspects of the efficacy of refutation text. Although a developmental relationship was not revealed, two decades of research indicate that reading refutation text rather than traditional expository text is more likely to result in conceptual change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. AIP Operation Physics Project. (1998). Children's misconceptions about science. Retrieved from http://www.amasci.com/miscon/opphys.html.

  2. Alvermann, D., & Hague, S. (1989). Comprehension of counterintuitive science text: Effects of prior knowledge and text structure. Journal of Educational Research, 82, 197–202.

  3. Alvermann, D., & Hynd, C. (1989). Study strategies for correcting misconceptions in physics: An intervention. In S. McCormick & J. Zutell (Eds.), Cognitive and social perspectives for literacy research and instruction (pp. 353–361). Chicago, IL: NRC.

  4. Alvermann, D., Hynd, C., & Qian, G. (1995). Effects of interactive discussion and text type on learning counterintuitive science concepts. The Journal of Educational Research, 88, 146–154.

  5. Broughton, S., Sinatra, G., & Reynolds, R. (2007, August). Attention allocation, background knowledge and the refutation text effect. Paper presented at the 12th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Budapest, Hungary.

  6. Chambliss, M. (2002). The characteristics of well-designed science textbooks. In J. Otero, J. León, & A. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 51–72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  7. Chi, M.T.H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 61–82). New York, NY: Routledge.

  8. Chi, M.T.H., Slotta, J.D., & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4, 27–43.

  9. Chinn, C., & Brewer, W. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction (Technical Report No. 583). Urbana, IL: Center for the Study of Reading. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED361655).

  10. Chinn, C., & Malhotra, B. (2002). Children’s responses to anomalous scientific data: How is conceptual change impeded? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 327–343.

  11. Chiu, M., & Wong, S. (1995). Ninth graders' mental models and processes of generating inferences of four seasons [Abstract]. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 3, 23–68. Retrieved from http://www1.fed.cuhk.edu.hk/en/cjse/0301/0301023.htm.

  12. Diakidoy, I., Kendeou, P., & Ioannides, C. (2002). Reading about energy: The effects of text structure in science learning and conceptual change. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED 464828).

  13. Dole, J., & Niederhauser, D. (1990). Students' level of commitment to their naïve conceptions and their conceptual change learning from texts. In J. Zutell & S. McCormick (Eds.), Literacy theory and research: Analyses from multiple paradigms (pp. 303–310). Chicago, IL: NRC.

  14. Dole, J., & Smith, E. (1989). Prior knowledge and learning from science text: An instructional study. In S. McCormick and J. Zutell (Eds.), Cognitive and social perspectives for literacy research and instruction (pp. 345–352). Chicago, IL: NRC.

  15. Duit, R., Treagust, D.F., & Widodo, A. (2008). Teaching science for conceptual change: Theory and practice. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 629–646). New York, NY: Routledge.

  16. Duke, N., & Pearson, P. D. (2002) Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3 rd ed., pp. 205–242). Newark, DE: IRA.

  17. Frède, V. (2008). Teaching astronomy for pre-service elementary teachers: A comparison of methods. Advances in Space Research, 42, 1819–1830. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2007.12.001.

  18. Gordon, C., & Rennie, B. (1987). Restructuring content schemata: An intervention study. Reading Research and Instruction, 26(3), 162–188.

  19. Guzzetti, B. (1990). Effects of textual and instructional manipulations on concept acquisition. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 11, 49–62.

  20. Guzzetti, B. (2000). Learning counter-intuitive science concepts: What have we learned from over a decade of research? Reading and Writing Quarterly, 16, 89–98.

  21. Guzzetti, B., Snyder, T., & Glass, G. (1992). Promoting conceptual change in science: Can texts be used effectively? Journal of Reading, 35, 642–649.

  22. Guzzetti, B., Snyder, T., Glass, G., & Gamas, W. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 117–155.

  23. Guzzetti, B., Williams, W., Skeels, S., & Wu, S. (1997). Influence of text structure on learning counterintuitive physics concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 701–719.

  24. Harp, S., & Mayer, R. (1997). The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 92–102.

  25. Hynd, C. (2001). Refutational texts and the change process. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 699–714.

  26. Hynd, C., & Alvermann, D. (1986a). The role of refutation text in overcoming difficulty with science concepts. Journal of Reading, 29, 440–446.

  27. Hynd, C., & Alvermann, D. (1986b). Prior knowledge activation in refutation and nonrefutation text. In J.A. Niles & R.V. Lalik (Eds.), Solving problems in literacy: Learners, teachers, and researchers (pp. 55–60). Chicago, IL: NRC.

  28. Hynd, C., Alvermann, D., & Qian, G. (1997). Preservice elementary school teachers' conceptual change about projectile motion. Science Education, 81, 1–27.

  29. Hynd, C., McWhorter, J., Phares, V., & Suttles, C. (1994). The role of instructional variables in conceptual change in high school physics topics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 933–946.

  30. Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1567–1577.

  31. Maria, K. (2000). Conceptual change instruction: a social constructivist perspective. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 16, 5–22.

  32. Maria, K., & Johnson, J. (1989). Correcting misconceptions: Effect of type of text. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED 315749).

  33. Maria, K., & MacGinitie, W. (1987). Learning from texts that refute the reader's prior knowledge. Reading Research and Instruction, 26, 222–238.

  34. Marshall, N. (1989). Overcoming problems with incorrect prior knowledge: An instructional study. In S. McCormick and J. Zutell (Eds.), Cognitive and social perspectives for literacy research and instruction (pp. 323–330). Chicago, IL: NRC.

  35. Mason, L., & Gava, M. (2007). Effects of epistemological beliefs and learning text structure on conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou, A. Baltas, & X. Vamvakoussi (Eds.), Reframing the conceptual change approach in learning and instruction (pp. 165–197). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

  36. Mason, L., Gava, M., & Boldrin, A. (2008). On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 291–309.

  37. Mayer, D. (1995). How can we best use literature in teaching. Science and Children, 43, 16–19.

  38. Mikkilä-Erdmann, M. (2001). Improving conceptual change concerning photosynthesis through text design. Learning and Instruction, 11, 241–257.

  39. Mikkilä-Erdmann, M., Penttinen, M., Anto, E., & Olkinuora, E. (2008). Constructing mental models during learning from science text: Eye tracking methodology meets conceptual change. In D. Ifenthaler, P. Pirnay-Dummer, & J. M. Spector (Eds.), Understanding models for learning and instruction (pp. 63–79). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-76898-4.

  40. Newton, L. D., Newton, D. P., Blake, A., & Brown, K. (2002). Do primary school science books for children show a concern for explanatory understanding? Research in Science and Technological Education, 20, 227–240.

  41. Palmer, D. (2003). Investigating the relationship between refutational text and conceptual change. Science Education, 87, 663–684.

  42. Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought (A. Rosin, Trans.) New York, NY: Viking. (Original work published 1975).

  43. Pinarbaşi, T., Canpolat, N., Bayrakçeken, S., & Geban, Ö. (2006). An investigation of effectiveness of conceptual change text-oriented instruction on students’ understanding of solution concepts. Research in Science Education, 36, 313–335. doi:10.1007/s11165-005-9003-4.

  44. Pintrich, P., Marx, R., & Boyle, R. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199.

  45. Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.

  46. Qian, G. (November, 1995). The role of epistemological beliefs and motivational goals in ethnically diverse high school students’ learning from science text. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, New Orleans, LA.

  47. Rossman, G.B., & Yore, L.D. (2009). Stitching the pieces together to reveal the generalized patterns: Systematic research reviews, secondary reanalyses, case-to-case comparison, and metasyntheses of qualitative research studies. In M. C. Shelley II, L.D. Yore, & B. Hand (Eds.), Quality research in literacy and science education (pp. 575–601). New York, NY: Springer.

  48. Salisbury-Glennon, J. D., & Stevens, R. (1999). Addressing preservice teachers’ conceptions of motivation. Teaching and Teaching Education, 15, 741–752.

  49. Scott, P., Asoko, H., & Leach, J. (2007). Student conceptions and conceptual learning in science. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 31–56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  50. Shanahan, C. (2004). Better textbooks, better readers and writers. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing Borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 370–382). Newark, DE: IRA.

  51. Skopeliti, I., & Vosniadou, S. (July, 2006). The influence of refutational text on children’s ideas about the earth. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver, Canada.

  52. Skopeliti, I., & Vosniadou, S. (2007, August).The influence of refutational and categorical information on children’s scientific understanding. Paper presented at the 12th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and instruction, Budapest, Hungary.

  53. Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. Duschl & R. Hamilton, (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive science, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147–176). Albany, NY: SUNY.

  54. Sungur, S., Tekkaya, C., & Geban, O. (2001). The contribution of conceptual change texts accompanied by concept mapping to students’ understanding of the human circulatory system. School Science and Mathematics, 101, 91–101.

  55. Tekkaya, C. (2003). Remediating high school students’ misconceptions concerning diffusion and osmosis through concept mapping and conceptual change text. Research in Science and Technological Education, 21, 5–16.

  56. Tippett, C.D. (2004). Conceptual change: The power of refutation text. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.

  57. Tippett, C.D. (2009). Refutation text: Effective yet elusive. Unpublished manuscript.

  58. Tsai, C., & Chou, C. (2002). Diagnosing students’ alternative conceptions in science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 157–165.

  59. Wandersee, J., Mintzes, J., & Novak, J. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177–210). Toronto, Canada: Macmillan.

  60. Wang, T., & Andre, T. (1991). Conceptual change text versus traditional text and application questions versus no questions in learning about electricity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 103–116.

  61. White, R.T., & Gunstone, R.F. (2008). The conceptual change approach and the teaching of science. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 619–628). New York, NY: Routledge.

  62. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT.

  63. Yore, L. D., Craig, M., & Maguire, T. (1998). Index of science reading awareness: An interactive-constructive model, test verification, and grades 4-8 results. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 27–51.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Drs. Larry D. Yore and Sylvia Pantaleo for their guidance and encouragement.

Author information

Correspondence to Christine D. Tippett.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Refutation research studies (DOC 106 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tippett, C.D. REFUTATION TEXT IN SCIENCE EDUCATION: A REVIEW OF TWO DECADES OF RESEARCH. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 8, 951–970 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9203-x

Download citation

KEY WORDS

  • conceptual change
  • misconceptions
  • reading
  • refutation text
  • science education