ABSTRACT
This study examined the differential impacts of an inquiry-based instruction on conceptual changes across levels of prior knowledge and reading ability. The instrument emphasized four simultaneously important components: conceptual knowledge, reading ability, attitude toward science, and learning environment. Although the learning patterns and effect size analyses indicated that students from all subgroups demonstrated substantial gains on weather concepts, students from the low prior conceptual knowledge group demonstrated greater gains in conceptual knowledge than subgroups with more prior knowledge; and these gains remained stable 3 weeks after the instruction ceased. However, students from the low language proficiency group showed the least gains in conceptual knowledge. Students’ prior knowledge and reading ability were found to be positively and significantly associated to conceptual development. Recent perspectives on the role of language in science education and suggestions that support learning during instruction are briefly described.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., et al. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419.
Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., & Ostertag, J. (1989). Teaching text structure to improve reading and writing. Reading Teacher, 43(2), 130–137.
Atkin, J. M., & Coffey, J. E. (2003). Everyday assessment in the science classroom. Arlington: NSTA.
Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune & Stratton.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2001). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Brewer, W. F., & Samarapungavan, A. (1991). Children’s theories vs. scientific theories: Differences in reasoning or differences in knowledge? In R. R. Hoffman & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes: Applied and ecological perspectives (pp. 209–232). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Brown, A. L. (1990). Domain-specific principles affect learning and transfer in children. Cognitive Science, 14(1), 107–133.
Campbell, D., & Stanley, J. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental design for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Chang, C.-Y., & Mao, S.-L. (1998, April). The effects of an IBI method on earth science students’ achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, CA, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 418 858.
Chang, C.-Y., & Mao, S.-L. (1999). Comparison of Taiwan science students’ outcomes with inquiry-group versus traditional instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 92(6), 340–346.
Chinese Youth Growth Cultural and Educational Foundation. (2008). The origin of the weather map [in Chinese]. Retrieved August 1, 2008, from http://www.bud.org.tw/Ma/Ma02.htm.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. Science Scope, 23(6), 42–44.
Cook, L., & Mayer, R. (1988). Teaching readers about the structure of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 448–456.
Crawford, B. A., Zembal-Saul, C., Munford, D., & Friedrichsen, P. (2005). Confronting prospective teachers’ ideas of evolution and scientific inquiry using technology and inquiry-based tasks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 613–637.
Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children’s ideas in science. London: Open University Press.
Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (2001). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children’s ideas. London: Routledge Falmer.
Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2005). The relation between prior knowledge and students’ collaborative discovery learning processes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 264–282.
Glynn, S. M., & Muth, K. D. (1994). Reading and writing to learn science: Achieving scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 1057–1073.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Washington, D.C.: The Falmer Press.
Henriques, L. (2002). Children’s ideas about weather: A review of the literature. School Science and Mathematics, 102(5), 202–215.
Hewson, P. W. (2004). Resources for science learning: Tools, tasks, and environment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 201–225.
Lee, O. (2003, March). Promoting scientific inquiry with elementary students from diverse cultures and languages. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA.
Lin, B. Y. (2003). A study of 3–4 grade elementary school students’ misconceptions of weather. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taichung University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Lin, B.-G., & Chi, P.-H. (2000). The development of test of reading comprehension. Bulletin of Special Education, 19, 79–104.
Loman, N. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1983). Signaling techniques that increase the understandability of expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(3), 402–412.
Mao, S.-L., Chang, C.-Y., & Barufaldi, J. P. (1998). Inquiry teaching and its effects on secondary-school-students’ learning of earth science concepts. Journal of Geoscience Education, 46, 363–368.
Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, R., et al. (2004). Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1063–1080.
McCarthey, S. J., & Raphael, T. E. (1992). Alternative research perspectives. In J. W. Irwin & M. Doyle (Eds.), Reading/writing connections: Learning from research (pp. 2–30). Newark: International Reading Association.
McCarthy, C. B. (2005). Effects of thematic-based, hands-on science teaching versus a textbook approach for students with disabilities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 245–263.
Ministry of Education. (2001). The 1–9 grades school science and life technology curriculum standards. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
Phillips, L. M. (1988). Young readers’ inference strategies in reading comprehension. Cognition and Instruction, 5(3), 193–222.
Rivard, L. P. (1994). A review of writing to learn in science: Implications for practice and research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 969–983.
Roach, L. E., & Wandersee, J. H. (1993). Short story science: Using historical vignettes as a teaching tool. The Science Teacher, 60(6), 18–21.
Roach, L. E., & Wandersee, J. H. (1995). Putting people back into science: Using historical vignettes. School Science and Mathematics, 95(7), 365–370.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning. Oakland: The Regents of the University of California.
Shymansky, J. A., Kyle, W. J., Jr., & Alport, J. M. (1983). The effects of new science curricula on student performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 387–404.
Spence, D. J., Yore, L. D., & Williams, R. L. (1999). The effects of explicit science reading instruction on selected grade 7 students’ metacognition and comprehension of specific science text. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 11(2), 15–30.
Spiegel, G. F., & Barufaldi, J. P. (1994). The effects of a combination of text structure awareness and graphic post-organizers on recall and retention of science knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 913–932.
United States National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington: The National Academies Press.
United States National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington: The National Academies Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. New York: Wiley.
Wallace, C. S., Tsoi, M. Y., Calkin, J., & Darley, M. (2003). Learning from inquiry-based laboratories in non-major biology: An interpretive study of the relationships among inquiry experience, epistemologies, and conceptual growth. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 986–1024.
Wang, J.-R., & Lin, S.-W. (2009). Evaluating elementary and secondary school science learning environments in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 31(7), 853–872.
Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
Yore, L. D., & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Current realities and future possibilities: Language and science literacy-empowering research and informing instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 291–314.
Yore, L. D., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689–725.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, JR., Wang, YC., Tai, HJ. et al. INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INQUIRY-BASED INSTRUCTION ON STUDENTS WITH DIFFERENT PRIOR KNOWLEDGE AND READING ABILITIES. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 8, 801–820 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9186-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9186-7