• Koun-Tem SunEmail author
  • Ching-Ling Lin
  • Sheng-Min Wang


The relative positions of the sun, moon, and earth, their movements, and their relationships are abstract and difficult to understand astronomical concepts in elementary school science. This study proposes a three-dimensional (3-D) virtual reality (VR) model named the Sun and Moon System. This e-learning resource was designed by combining Microsoft Direct3D Library, C++ programming language, and Autodesk 3 Ds Max for constructing models. This learning environment provides a way for teachers to integrate information and technology into their science teaching. Furthermore, this study explored how teaching with the Sun and Moon System affected 128 Taiwanese fourth-grade students’ science achievement. Four classes were randomly divided into comparison and treatment groups. The results show that: (a) students in the treatment group achieved significantly better grades than those in the comparison group under traditional class instruction and (b) the questionnaire results revealed that more than two thirds of the treatment group liked to use the 3-D VR model and would like to introduce it to their classmates. Based on these positive results, we are encouraged to develop more 3-D VR learning environments.


3-D virtual reality astronomy integrating information communication technologies learning achievement science and technology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 4D2U Project & National Astronomical Observatory of Japan. (2007). Navigator (English version) [computer software]. Retrieved from
  2. AlphaCentaure (version 1.251) [computer software]. Retrieved from
  3. Ariyasu, K., Yamada, I., Sumiyoshi, H., Shibata, M., & Yagi, N. (2005). Visualization of text-based dialog in a virtual classroom for e-learning. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E88-D(5), 836–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avradinis, N., Vosinakis, S., & Panayiotopoulos, T. (2000). Using virtual reality techniques for the simulation of physics experiments. In Proceedings of the 4th World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (SCI 2000), Orlando, Florida, USA, pp. 6–11.Google Scholar
  5. Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Squire, K., Barnett, M., Schmidt, R., & Karrigan, K. (2000). Virtual solar system project: Learning through a technology-rich, inquiry-based, participatory learning environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9(1), 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnett, M., Keating, T., Barab, S. A., & Hay, K. E. (2000). Conceptual change through building three-dimensional virtual models. In B. Fishman & S. O’Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Fourth international conference of the learning sciences (pp. 134–141). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Barnett, M., Yamagata-Lynch, L., Keating, T., Barab, S. A., & Hay, K. E. (2005). Using virtual reality computer models to support student understanding of astronomical concepts. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24(4), 333–356.Google Scholar
  8. Bellamine, M., Abe, N., Tanaka, K., & Taki, H. (2005). A remote diagnosis system for rotating machinery using virtual reality. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E88-D(5), 894–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brooks, F. P., Jr. (1999). What's real about virtual reality? IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 19(6), 16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. New York: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  11. Chen, C.-H., Yang, J.-C., Shen, S., & Jeng, M.-C. (2007). A desktop virtual reality earth motion system in astronomy education. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 289–304.Google Scholar
  12. Christou, I. T., Efremidis, S., Tiropanis, T., & Kalis, A. (2007). Grid-based virtual laboratory experiments for a graduate course on sensor networks. IEEE Transaction on Education, 50(1), 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Corter, J. E., Nickerson, J. V., Esche, S. K., Chassapis, C., Im, S., & Ma, J. (2007). Constructing reality: A study of remote, hands-on, and simulated laboratories. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 14(2), Article 7.Google Scholar
  14. DiSessa, A. (1982). Unlearning Aristotelian physics: A study of knowledge-based learning. Cognitive Science, 6(1), 37–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dixon, J. K. (1997). Computer use and visualization in students' construction of reflection and rotation concepts. School Science and Mathematics, 97(7), 352–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duffett-Smith, P. (1988). Practical astronomy with your calculator (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dunlop, J. (2000). How children observe the universe. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 17, 194–206.Google Scholar
  18. EnchantedLearning. (2001). 2D solar system diagram used to identify names of planets. Retrieved from
  19. Etacude. (2004). 2D solar system diagram with perspective. Retrieved from
  20. Gazit, E., Chen, D., & Yair, Y. (2004). Using a virtual solar system to develop a conceptual understanding of basic astronomical phenomena. In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia, and Telecommunications 2004, Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education, Chesapeake, VA, pp. 4344–4350.Google Scholar
  21. Hansen, J. A., Barnett, M., & MaKinster, J. G. (2004). The impact of three-dimensional computational modeling on student understanding of astronomical concepts: A quantitative analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 1365–1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Henriques, L. (2002). Children's ideas about weather: A review of the literature. School Science and Mathematics, 102(5), 202–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hong, D., & Woo, W. (2006). A framework for virtual reality with tangible augmented reality-based user interface. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E89-D(1), 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jensen, H. W., Durand, F., Stark, M. M., Premoze, S., Dorsey, J., & Shirley, P. (2001). A physically-based night sky model. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH'2001), Association for Computing Machinery, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 399–408.Google Scholar
  25. Kaiser, M., Proffitt, D., & Anderson, K. (1985). Judgments of natural and anomalous trajectories in the presence and absence of motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 795–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koyanagi, K., Fujii, Y., & Furusho, J. (2005). Development of VR-STEF system with force display glove system. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence (ICAT2005), Association for Computing Machinery, Christchurch, New Zealand, pp. 91–97.Google Scholar
  27. Large, A. (1996). Computer animation in an instructional environment. Library & Information Science Research, 18, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee, W.-B., Li, J.-G., & Cheung, C.-F. (2002). Development of a virtual training workshop in ultra-precision machining. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18(5), 584–596.Google Scholar
  29. Likert, R. (1967). The method of constructing an attitude scale. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement (pp. 90–95). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Mao, S.-L., & Chang, C.-Y. (1998). Impacts of an inquiry teaching method on earth science students' learning outcomes and attitudes at the secondary school level. Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China—Part D: Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 8(3), 93–101.Google Scholar
  31. Mayer, R. E. (2008). Research-based principles for learning with animation. In R. K. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation: Research and implications for design. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 484–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 444–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meeus, J. (1988). Astronomical formulae for calculators (4th ed.). Richmond: Willmann-Bell.Google Scholar
  35. Ministry of Education. (2006a). General guidelines of grades 1–9 curriculum for elementary and junior high school education. Taipei: Ministry of Education. In Chinese.Google Scholar
  36. Ministry of Education. (2006b). Guidelines of science and technology learning area in grades 1–9 curriculum for elementary and junior high school education. Taipei: Ministry of Education. In Chinese.Google Scholar
  37. Mintz, R., Litvak, S., & Yair, Y. (2001). 3D-virtual reality in science education: An implication for astronomy teaching. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 20(3), 293–305.Google Scholar
  38. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  39. Parker, J., & Heywood, D. (1998). The earth and beyond: Developing primary teachers' understanding of basic astronomical events. International Journal of Science Education, 20(5), 503–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pena, E. M., & Quilez, M. J. G. (2001). The importance of images in astronomy education. International Journal of Science Education, 23(11), 1125–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rieber, L. (1990). Animation in computer based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(1), 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rieber, L. (1992). Computer-based microworlds: A bridge between constructivism and direct instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(1), 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rieber, L. (1994). Computer, graphics, & learning. Madison: Brown & Benchmark.Google Scholar
  44. Salzman, M. C., Dede, C., & Loftin, R. B. (1995). Learner-centered design of sensorily immersive microworlds using a virtual reality interface. In J. Greer (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education, Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education, Charlottesville, VA, pp. 554–564.Google Scholar
  45. Sky Charts (version 2.76) [computer software]. Retrieved from
  46. Soloway, E., Guzdial, M., & Hay, K. E. (1994). Learner-centered design: The challenge for HCI in the 21st century. Interactions, 1(1), 36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. StellaNavigator (version 8) [computer software]. Retrieved from (in Japanese).
  48. Stellarium (version 0.10.2) [computer software]. Retrieved from
  49. Sun, K.-T., Lin, Y.-C., & Yu, C.-J. (2008). A study on learning effect among different learning styles in a web-based lab of science for elementary school students. Computers & Education, 50, 1411–1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Warwick, K., Gray, J., & Roberts, D. (1993). Virtual reality in engineering. London: The Institution of Electrical Engineers.Google Scholar
  51. Weiss, R. E., Knowlton, D. S., & Morrison, G. R. (2002). Principles for using animation in computer-based instruction: Theoretical heuristics for effective design. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 465–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yore, L. D., Pimm, D., & Tuan, H.-L. (2007). The literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5, 559–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Youngblut, C. (1998). Educational uses of virtual reality technology. Technical Report IDA Document D-2128, Institute for Defense Analyses, Alexandria.Google Scholar
  54. Zhou, J. L. (2006). The orbit type of two-body problem (the foundation of celestial mechanics). Retrieved from (in Chinese).

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information and Learning TechnologyNational University of TainanTainanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations