# The Literacy Component of Mathematical and Scientific Literacy

## Abstract

This opening article of the Special Issue makes an argument for parallel definitions of scientific literacy and mathematical literacy that have shared features: importance of general cognitive and metacognitive abilities and reasoning/thinking and discipline-specific language, habits-of-mind/emotional dispositions, and information communication technology strategies to prepare people for adult life and democratic citizenship. These frameworks provide potential insights into research and pedagogy. Furthermore, they provide guidelines for second-generation standards, curriculum development and assessment so as not to overlook or underemphasize the fundamental literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy for all students, which can result in fuller participation in the public debate about science, mathematics, technology, society, and environment issues.

## Key words

educational reform literacy mathematical literacy scientific literacy## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993).
*Benchmarks for science literacy*. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar - Anderson, J.O., Lin, H.-S., Treagust, D.F., Ross, S.P. & Yore, L.D. (this issue). Using large-scale assessment datasets for research in science and mathematics education: Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA).
*Int J Sci Math Edu*.Google Scholar - Barton, D. & Hamilton, M. (1998).
*Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community*. London: Routledge.Google Scholar - Barwell, R. (2004). What is numeracy?
*For the Learning of Mathematics, 24*(1), 20–22.Google Scholar - Baxter, J.A., Woodward, J. & Olson, D. (2005). Writing in mathematics: An alternative form of communication for academically low-achieving students.
*Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20*(2), 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Boero, P., Douek, N. & Ferrari, P.L. (2002). Developing mastery of natural language: Approaches to theoretical aspects of mathematics. In L.D. English (Ed.),
*Handbook of international research in mathematics education*(pp. 241–268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum/National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar - Borasi, R. & Siegel, M. (2000).
*Reading counts: Expanding the role of reading in mathematics classrooms*. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar - British Columbia Ministry of Education (2007a).
*Foundation skills assessment*. Retrieved 28 May 2007, from http://www.bced.gov.bc.ca/assessment/fsa/. - British Columbia Ministry of Education (2007b).
*FSA numeracy specifications*. Retrieved 28 May 2007, from http://www.bced.gov.bc.ca/assessment/fsa/specifications/numeracy_specs.pdf. - Cooper, B. (2004). Dilemmas in designing problems in “realistic” school mathematics: A sociological overview and some research findings. In M. Olssen (Ed.),
*Culture and learning: Access and opportunity in the classroom*(pp. 183–202). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar - Cooper, B. & Dunne, M. (2000).
*Assessing children’s mathematical knowledge: Social class, sex and problem-solving*. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar - Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (1997).
*Common framework of science learning outcomes, K to 12*. Toronto, ON: Author. Retrieved 21 June 2007, from http://www.cmec.ca/science/framework/.Google Scholar - de Lange, J. (1996). Using and applying mathematics in education. In A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & C. Laborde (Eds.),
*International handbook of mathematics education*(pp. 49–97). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar - Dole, J.A. (2000). Readers, texts and conceptual change learning.
*Reading and Writing Quarterly, 16*, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Dole, J.A. & Smith, E.L. (1989). Prior knowledge and learning from science text: An instructional study. In S. McCormick & J. Zutell (Eds.),
*Cognitive and social perspectives for literacy research and instruction*(pp. 345–352). Chicago: National Reading Conference.Google Scholar - Elliott, P.C. & Kenney, M.J. (Eds.) (1996).
*Communication in mathematics, K-12 and beyond*. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar - English, L.D. (2002). Priority themes and issues in international research on mathematics education. In L.D. English (Ed.),
*Handbook of international research in mathematics education*(pp. 3–15). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum/National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar - Fellows, N.J. (1994). A window into thinking: Using student writing to understand conceptual change in science learning.
*J Res Sci Teach, 31*, 985–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ferreiro, E. (2000). Reading and writing in a changing world.
*Publishing Research Quarterly*, 53–61, Fall.Google Scholar - Ferreiro, E. (2003).
*Past and present of the verbs to read and to write: Essays on literacy*. Berkeley, CA: Douglas & McIntyre.Google Scholar - Florence, M.K. & Yore, L.D. (2004). Learning to write like a scientist: Co-authoring as an enculturation task.
*J Res Sci Teach, 41*, 637–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ford, C.L. (1998).
*Educating preservice teachers to teach for an evaluative view of knowledge and critical thinking in elementary social studies*. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar - Ford, C.L., Yore, L.D. & Anthony, R.J. (1997).
*Reforms, visions and standards: A cross-curricular view from an elementary school perspective*. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 406 168).Google Scholar - Fuson, K.C., Kalchman, M. & Bransford, J.D. (2005). Mathematics understanding: An introduction. In National Research Council,
*How students learn: Mathematics in the classroom*. Committee on*How People Learn*, A Targeted Report for Teachers, M.S. Donovan & J.D. Bransford (Eds.). Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar - Gee, J.P. (2004). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school-based literacy. In E.W. Saul (Ed.),
*Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives in theory and practice*(pp. 13–32). Newark, DE: International Reading Association/National Science Teachers Association.Google Scholar - Gerofsky, S. (2004).
*A man left Albuquerque heading east: Word problems as genre in mathematics education*. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar - Good, R.G., Shymansky, J.A. & Yore, L.D. (1999). Censorship in science and science education. In E.H. Brinkley (Ed.),
*Caught off guard: Teachers rethinking censorship and controversy*(pp. 101–121). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar - Halliday, M. (1978). Sociolinguistic aspects of mathematical education. In M. Halliday (Ed.),
*Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning*(pp. 194–204). Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar - Hand, B.M., Prain, V. & Yore, L.D. (2001). Sequential writing tasks’ influence on science learning. In P. Tynjälä, L. Mason & K. Lonka (Eds.),
*Writing as a learning tool: Integrating theory and practice*(pp. 105–129). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar - Hand, B.M., Alvermann, D.E., Gee, J., Guzzetti, B.J., Norris, S.P., Phillips, L.M., Prain, V. & Yore, L.D. (2003). Message from the “Island Group”: What is literacy in science literacy?
*J Res Sci Teach, 40*, 607–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hurd, P.D. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world.
*Science Education, 82*, 407–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Jablonka, E. (2003). Mathematical literacy. In A.J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel & F.K.S. Leung (Eds.),
*Second international handbook of mathematics education*(pp. 75–102). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar - Kaiser, G. & Willander, T. (2005). Development of mathematical literacy: Results of an empirical study.
*Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 24*(2–3), 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Keys, C.W. (1994). The development of scientific reasoning skills in conjunction with collaborative writing assignments: An interpretive study of six ninth-grade students.
*J Res Sci Teach, 31*, 1003–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kilpatrick, J. (2001). Understanding mathematical literacy: The contribution of research.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47*(1), 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Klein, P.D. (2000). Elementary students’ strategies for writing-to-learn in science.
*Cognition and Instruction, 18*(3), 317–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lemke, J. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J.R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.),
*Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives of discourse of science*(pp. 87–111). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar - Mason, J. (1988). Modelling: What do we really want pupils to learn? In D. Pimm (Ed.),
*Mathematics, teachers and children: A reader*(pp. 201–215). London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar - McEneaney, E. (2003). The worldwide cachet of scientific literacy.
*Comparative Education Review, 47*(2), 217–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Morgan, C. (1998).
*Writing mathematically: The discourse of investigation*. Bristol, PA: Falmer.Google Scholar - National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989).
*Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics*. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar - National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1991).
*Professional standards for teaching mathematics*. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar - National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000).
*Principles and standards for school mathematics*. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar - National Research Council (1996).
*The national science education standards*. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar - National Research Council (1999).
*How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school*. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning, J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown & R.R. Cocking (Eds.), Commission on behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar - National Research Council (2005a).
*How students learn: Mathematics in the classroom*. Committee on*How People Learn*, A Targeted Report for Teachers, M.S. Donovan & J.D. Bransford (Eds.), Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar - National Research Council (2005b).
*How students learn: Science in the classroom*. Committee on*How People Learn*, A Targeted Report for Teachers, M.S. Donovan & J.D. Bransford (Eds.), Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar - National Research Council (2007).
*Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8*. Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten Through Eighth Grade. R.A. Duschl, H.A. Schweingruber & A.W. Shouse (Eds.), Board on Science Education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar - Norris, S. & Phillips, L. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy.
*Science Education, 87*(2), 224–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Noss, R. (1998). New numeracies for a technological culture.
*For the Learning of Mathematics, 18*(2), 2–12.Google Scholar - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2001).
*Knowledge and skills for life: First results from the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)*. Paris: Author.Google Scholar - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2003).
*The PISA 2003 assessment framework - mathematics, reading, science and problem solving: Knowledge and skills*. Paris: Author.Google Scholar - Osborne, R.J. & Wittrock, M.C. (1983). Learning science: A generative process.
*Science Education, 67*, 489–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Phillips, E. & Crespo, S. (1996). Developing written communication in mathematics through math penpal letters.
*For the Learning of Mathematics, 16*(1), 15–22.Google Scholar - Pimm, D. (1987).
*Speaking mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms*. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar - Pimm, D. (1988). Mathematical metaphor.
*For the Learning of Mathematics, 8*(1), 30–34.Google Scholar - Pimm, D. & Wagner, D. (2003). Investigation, mathematics education and genre.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53*(2), 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Rivard, L.P. (1994). A review of writing to learn in science: Implications for practice and research.
*J Res Sci Teach, 31*, 969–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sfard, A., Nesher, P., Streefland, L., Cobb, P. & Mason, J. (1998). Learning mathematics through conversation: Is it as good as they say?
*For the Learning of Mathematics, 18*(1), 41–51.Google Scholar - Shymansky, J.A., Yore, L.D., Treagust, D.F., Thiele, R.B., Harrison, A., Waldrip, B.G., Stocklmayer, S.M. & Venville, G. (1997). Examining the construction process: A study of changes in level 10 students’ understanding of classical mechanics.
*J Res Sci Teach, 34*, 571–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Siegel, M., Borasi, R., Fonzi, J.M., Sanridge, L.G. & Smith, C. (1996). Using reading to construct mathematical meaning. In P.C. Elliott & M.J. Kenney (Eds.),
*Communication in mathematics, K-12 and beyond*(pp. 66–75). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar - Siegel, M., Borasi, R. & Smith, C. (1999). A critical review of reading in mathematics instruction: The need for a new synthesis. In S. McCormick & J. Zutell (Eds.),
*Cognitive and social perspectives for literacy research and instruction*(pp. 269–277). Chicago: National Reading Conference.Google Scholar - Swafford, J. & Bryan, J. K. (2000). Instructional strategies for promoting conceptual change: Supporting middle school students.
*Reading and Writing Q, 16*, 139–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Tall, D. (2007, May).
*The long-term cognitive development of different types of reasoning and proof*. Paper presented at the international conference on Reading, Writing, and Argumentation in Science and Mathematics Education, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan.Google Scholar - Tall, D. & Mejia-Ramos, J.P. (2007, May).
*Embodiment, symbolism, argumentation and proof*. Paper presented at the international conference on Science and Mathematics Education, National Taitung University, Taitung City, Taiwan.Google Scholar - United Kingdom Ministry of Education (1959).
*15–18: A report of the Central Advisory Council for Education (England)*. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar - United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (2000). Science and technology education: Philosophy of project 2000+. Retrieved 20 June 2007, http://www.unesco.org/education/educprog/ste/projects/2000/meaning.htm.
- Unsworth, L. (2007, May).
*The grammatical construction of meaning in science books in English for primary and junior secondary school students: Implications for reading to learn in science*. Paper presented at the international conference on Reading, Writing, and Argumentation in Science and Mathematics Education, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan.Google Scholar - Wallace, C.S. (2004). An illumination of the roles of hands-on activities, discussion, text reading, and writing in constructing biology knowledge in seventh grade.
*School Science and Mathematics, 104*(2), 70–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Waywood, A. (1992). Journal writing and learning mathematics.
*For the Learning of Mathematics, 12*(2), 34–43.Google Scholar - Western and Northern Canadian Protocol (2006).
*Common curriculum framework for mathematics*. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Education. Retrieved 18 June 2007, from http://www.wncp.ca/.Google Scholar - Wittrock, M.C. (1974). Generative model of mathematics learning.
*J Res Math Edu, 5*, 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Yore, L.D. (2004). Why do future scientists need to study the language arts? In E.W. Saul (Ed.),
*Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives in theory and practice*(pp. 71–94). Newark, DE: International Reading Association/National Science Teachers Association.Google Scholar - Yore, L.D. (in press). Science literacy for all students: Language, culture, and knowledge about nature and naturally occurring events.
*L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature*.Google Scholar - Yore, L.D. & Treagust, D. (2006). Current realities and future possibilities: Language and science literacy-empowering research and informing instruction.
*Int J Sci Educ, 28*(2–3), 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Yore, L.D., Hand, B.M. & Prain, V. (2002). Scientists as writers.
*Science Education, 86*(5), 672–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Yore, L.D., Bisanz, G.L. & Hand, B.M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research.
*Int J Sci Edu, 25,*689–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Yore, L.D., Hand, B.M. & Florence, M.L. (2004a). Scientists’ views of science, models of writing, and science writing practice.
*J Res Sci Teach, 41*(4), 338–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Yore, L.D., Hand, B.M., Goldman, S.R., Hildebrand, G.M., Osborne, J.F., Treagust, D.F. & Wallace, C.S. (2004b). New directions in language and science education research.
*Reading Res Q, 39*(3), 347–352.Google Scholar - Yore, L.D., Florence, M.K., Pearson, T.W. & Weaver, A.J. (2006). Written discourse in scientific communities: A conversation with two scientists about their views of science, use of language, role of writing in doing science, and compatibility between their epistemic views and language.
*Int J Sci Edu, 28*, 109–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar