Information Communication Technology (ICT) integration in a science education unit for preservice science teachers; students' perceptions of their ICT skills, knowledge and pedagogy

Article

Abstract

There is an expectation that new science teachers will be able to effectively use a range of information communication technology (ICT) related resources inthe science classroom in order to enhance student learning. All school systems in Australia are in the process of providing teachers with ICT professional development and infrastructure. This paper outlines a range of initiatives designed to integrate ICT in a compulsory science education unit for students enrolled in a Graduate Diploma in Secondary Education. An action research model based on constructivist principles was used to evaluate the effectiveness of modelling, open-ended co-operative group activities and authentic assessment in enabling students to enhance their ICT skills, knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in a science education context. Multiple sources of data were generated including a pre and post unit questionnaire that was analysed using Rasch modelling. The questionnaire determined students' perceptions of their preparedness to teach using ICT. The findings of this research suggest that some skills warranted greater attention in the unit, but students' pedagogical knowledge and knowledge and critique of ICT resources were enhanced over the duration of the unit.

Key Words

information communication technology integration preservice teacher education science education 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrich, D., de Jong, J.H.A.L. & Sheridan, B.E. (1997). Diagnostic opportunities with the Rasch model for ordered response categories. In J. Rost & R. Langeheine (Eds.), Applications of latent trait and latent class models in the social sciences (pp. 59–70). New York, NY: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  2. Andrich, D., Sheridan, B. & Luo, G. (2000). RUMM2010: A Windows interactive program for analysing data with Rasch unidimensional models for measurement. Perth, Western Australia: RUMM Laboratory.Google Scholar
  3. Biotechnology Australia. (2001). Biotechnology Online School Resource. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  4. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency. (2003). What research says about using ICT in science. Report to the BECTA ICT Research network. Retrieved from http://www.becta.org.uk/research/ictrn on 15 February.
  5. Cahill, J. & Spence, R. (1999). Heinemann science for Western Australia 2: An outcomes based approach. Post Melbourne, Vic: Reed International.Google Scholar
  6. Connelly, F.M. & Clandinin, D.J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  7. Curriculum Council of WA. (1998). Curriculum Framework for Kindergarten to Year 12 Education in Western Australia. Perth, WA: Curriculum Council of WA.Google Scholar
  8. Dawson, V.M. & Reid, D. (2003, July). Preparing preservice science teachers for ICT rich secondary classrooms. Paper presented at the 34th annual conference of the Australasian Science Education Research Association (ASERA), Melbourne, Victoria.Google Scholar
  9. Dawson, V. & Taylor, P.C. (1998). Establishing open and critical discourses in the science classroom: Reflecting on initial difficulties. Research in Science Education, 28(3), 317–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Forster, P.A., Dawson, V.M. & Reid, D. (2005). Preparedness to teach with ICT. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  11. Goodrum, D., Hackling, M. & Trotter, H. (2003). Collaborative Australian Secondary Science Program pilot study. Perth, Western Australia: Edith Cowan University.Google Scholar
  12. Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, California: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Hackling, M. (2004). Assessment in science. In G. Venville & V. Dawson (Eds.), The art of teaching science (pp. 126–144). Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  14. Holly, M. (1992). Keeping a personal-professional journal. Geelong, Vic: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner, 3rd ed. Geelong, Vic: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Keogh, B. & Naylor, S. (2001). Concept cartoons in science education CD. Science Teachers Association of Queensland.Google Scholar
  17. Leamnson, R. (2001). Does technology present a new way of learning? Educational Technology & Society, 4(1), 75–79.Google Scholar
  18. McGinn, M.K. & Roth, W.-M. (1999). Preparing students for competent scientific practice: Implications of recent research in science and technology. Educational Researcher, 28(3), 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pope, M., Hare, D. & Howard, E. (2002). Technology integration: Closing the gap between what preservice teachers are taught to do and what they can do. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2), 191–203.Google Scholar
  20. Przywolnik, G. (2001). Integrating appropriate technology in the science classroom. SCIOS, 35(3), 9–11.Google Scholar
  21. Stake, R.E. (2000). Case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Taylor, P.C. (1998). Constructivism: Value added. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), Theinternational book of science education (pp. 1111–1123). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  23. Tytler, R. (2002). Teaching for understanding in science: Student conceptions, research, & changing views of science. Australian Science Teachers' Journal, 48(3), 14–21.Google Scholar
  24. Wang, Y.M. (2002). When technology meets beliefs: Preservice teachers' perception of the teacher's role in the classroom with computers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(1), 150–161.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Edith Cowan UniversityJoondalupWestern Australia
  2. 2.University of WollongongWollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations