Advertisement

Development and Validation of a Two-Tier Instrument to Examine Understanding of Internal Transport in Plants and the Human Circulatory System

  • Jing-Ru Wang
Article

Abstract

This study is intended to develop an assessment instrument to investigate students’ understandings about internal transport in plants and human circulatory system. A refined process of a two-tier diagnostic test was used to develop the instrument. Finally, three versions of the Internal Transport in Plants and the Human Circulatory System test were developed for different educational levels: elementary, secondary and high school level. The test–retest reliability, the degree of difficulty, and the range of discrimination were found to be reasonable for all three versions. The statistical variances across educational levels of the verification samples and the test applications are discussed. The students’ major alternative conceptions on internal transport of plants and human were classified into three attributes of explanations: interconnectedness, language and anthropomorphism. Based on the nature of students’ explanations, card-sorting with justification, learning cycle and concept mapping were recommended for in-depth learning of the concept.

Keywords

alternative conceptions human circulatory system internal transport in plants 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, A.D. & Griffard, P.B. (2001). Analysis of alternative conceptions in physics and biology: Similarities, differences, and implications for conceptual change. Paper presented at the 2001 NARST Annual Meeting Conference, St. Louis, 25–28 March. Google Scholar
  2. Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological testing, 5th edn. NY: Macmillan Publishing Co. Google Scholar
  3. Arnaudin, M.W. & Mintzes, J.J. (1985). Students’ alternative conceptions of the human circulatory system: A cross-age study. Science Education, 69, 721–733. Google Scholar
  4. Ausubel, D.P. (1968). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. NY: Grune and Stratton. Google Scholar
  5. Barker, M. & Carr, M. (1989). Teaching and learning about photo synthesis. Part 1: An assessment in terms of students’ prior knowledge. European Journal of Science Education, 11(1), 49–56. Google Scholar
  6. Brainsford, J.D., Brown, A.L. & Cocking, R.R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press. Google Scholar
  7. Chiou, Y. & Gene, J. (1994). The alternative frameworks of circulatory system concepts in eighth grade students. Science Education, 5, 53–57. (In Chinese.) Google Scholar
  8. Driver, R. & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61–84. Google Scholar
  9. Driver, A.S., Squires, A., Rushworth, P. & Wood-Robison, V. (2001). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children’s ideas. NY: Routledge Falmer. Google Scholar
  10. Gunstone, R. & Watts, M. (1993). Force and motion. In Driver, Guesne & Tiberghien (Eds.), Children’s ideas in science. Philadelphia: Open University Press. Google Scholar
  11. Haslam, F. & Treagust, D.F. (1987). Diagnosing secondary students’ misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument. Journal of Biological Education, 21, 203–211. Google Scholar
  12. Hewson, P.W. & Hewson, M.G.A. (1984). The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction. Instructional Science, 13, 1–13. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lawson, A.E. & Thomposon, L.D. (1988). Formal reasoning ability and biological misconceptions\concerning genetics and natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 733–746. Google Scholar
  14. Lien, A.J. (1971). Measurement and evaluation in learning, 2nd edn. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown Co. Google Scholar
  15. Mintzes, J.J., Wandersee, J.H. & Novak, J.D. (1997). Meaning learning in science: The human constructivist perspective. In Phye (Ed.), Handbook of academic learning: Construction of knowledge (pp. 405–477). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Google Scholar
  16. Novak, J. & Gowin, D.B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  17. Odom, A.L. & Barrow, L.H. (1995). Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students’ understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 54–61. Google Scholar
  18. Simpson, W.D. & Marek, E.A. (1988). Understandings and misconceptions of biology concepts held by students attending small high schools and students attending large high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 361–374. Google Scholar
  19. Tamir, P. (1989). Some issues related to the use of justifications to multiple-choice answers. Journal of Biological Education, 23(4), 285–292. Google Scholar
  20. Treagust, D.F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 159–169. Google Scholar
  21. Wandersee, J.H. (1983). Students’ misconceptions about photosynthesis: A cross-age study. In Helm & Novak (Eds.), Proceedings of the international seminar on misconceptions in science and mathematics (pp. 441–466). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar
  22. Wandersee, J.H. (2000). Language, analogy, and biology. In Fisher, Wandersee & Moody (Eds.), Mapping biology knowledge. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar
  23. Westbrook, S.L. & Marek, E.A. (1991). A cross-age study of student understanding of the concept of diffusion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(8), 649–660. Google Scholar
  24. White, R.W. & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. London: Falmer Press. Google Scholar
  25. Yip, D. (1998). Identification of misconceptions in novice biology teachers and remedial strategies for improving biology learning. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 461–477. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Science EducationNational Pingtung Teachers CollegePingtungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations