ALMA Band 1 Optics (35–50 GHz): Tolerance Analysis, Effect of Cryostat Infrared Filters and Cold Beam Measurements

  • A . Gonzalez
  • V. Tapia
  • R. Finger
  • C.-D. Huang
  • S. Asayama
  • Y.-D. Huang


The Atacama Large Millimeter/Sub-millimeter Array (ALMA) is currently the largest (sub-)mm wave telescope in the world and will be used for astronomical observations in all atmospheric windows from 35 to 950 GHz when completed. The ALMA band 1 (35–50 GHz) receiver will be used for the longest wavelength observations with ALMA. Because of the longer wavelength, the size of optics and waveguide components will be larger than for other ALMA bands. In addition, all components will be placed inside the ALMA cryostat in each antenna, which will impose severe mechanical constraints on the size and position of receiver optics components. Due to these constraints, the designs of the corrugated feed horn and lens optics are highly optimized to comply with the stringent ALMA optical requirements. In this paper, we perform several tolerance analyses to check the impact of fabrication errors in such an optimized design. Secondly, we analyze the effects of operating this optics inside the ALMA cryostat, in particular the effects of having the cryostat IR filters placed next to the band 1 feed horn aperture, with the consequent near-field effects. Finally, we report on beam measurements performed on the first three ALMA band 1 receivers inside test cryostats, which satisfy ALMA specifications. In these measurements, we can clearly observe the effects of fabrication tolerances and IR filter effects on prototype receiver performance.


Quasi-optics Radio astronomy ALMA mm-wave Tolerance analysis Cryogenic receiver Dielectric lens Corrugated horn mm-wave measurements 


  1. 1.
    A. Wootten, and A. Thompson, “The Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol.97, 1463 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y-J. Hwang, et al., “Band 1 receiver front-end cartridges for Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA): design and development toward production”, SPIE conference on Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation 2016 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. Reyes, et al., “Design of the optical system for ALMA Band 1,” in Proceedings of SPIE Vol. 9145, p. 91451W (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Gonzalez, et al., “Alternative optics design for the ALMA Band 1 receiver (35–52 GHz),” in European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), pp. 1–4 (2015).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. Tapia, et al., “High Efficiency Wideband Refractive Optics for ALMA Band-1 (35-52 GHz)”, Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves, Vol. 38, Issue 3, pp. 261–275 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. M. Hammersly and D. C. Handscomb, Monte Carlo Methods. New York: Wiley, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Gonzalez, and Y. Uzawa, “Tolerance Analysis of ALMA Band 10 Corrugated Horns and Optics”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 60, No. 7, pp. 3137–3145, 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Hammar, M. Whale, P. Forsberg, A. Murk, A. Emrich, and J. Stake, “Optical Tolerance Analysis of the Multi-Beam Limb Viewing Instrument STEAMR”, IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 714–721, 2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Candotti, Y. Uzawa, S. V. Shitov, Y. Fujii, and K. Kaneko, “ALMA band 10 optics tolerance analysis,” in Proc. 19th Int. Symp. on Space THz Technol., Groningen, The Netherlands, 2008, pp. 521–527Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    MIG WASP-NET, software description. Available:
  11. 11.
    MathWorks MATLAB, software description. Available:
  12. 12.
    A. Gonzalez, S. Asayama, V. Tapia, R. Finger, D. Monasterio and N. Reyes, "Effects of cryostat infrared filters on the performance of ALMA band 1 (35–52 GHz) receiver optics," 2016 I.E. International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (APS-URSI), Fajardo, 2016, pp. 381–382Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Gonzalez, and Y. Uzawa, “Investigation on ALMA Band-4 Frequency-Dependent Cross-Polarization”, IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology, Vol. 4, Issue 2, pp.184–192 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    ANSYS HFSS, software description. Available:
  15. 15.
    D. Slater, Near-Field Antenna Measurements. Norwood: Artech House, 1991Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Astronomical Observatory of JapanTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Universidad de ChileSantiagoChile
  3. 3.National Chung-Shang Institute of Science and TechnologyTaichungTaiwan
  4. 4.Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and AstrophysicsTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations