Field Performance Prediction and IR Imaging Simulation Based on Measured System Level Parameters*

  • Xiao-rui Wang
  • Wei-bo Xie
  • Hong-hua Chang
  • Jian-qi Zhang
Original Article
  • 36 Downloads

Abstract

Traditionally, the Minimum Resolvable Temperature Difference (MRTD) and the Johnson criteria are used to predict the field performance of IR imaging system. However this method generally leads to far too pessimistic range predictions. For the improvement of the prediction accuracy of the field performance, a novel approach to predict field performance is proposed based on the three-dimensional infrared scene generated by Vega software. Further, this approach utilizes the measured system level parameters to characterize the signal transfer process, noise, and the blur effect of the output image instead of theoretical model. By controlling the target range in the simulated image, a simulation experiment is performed, and the range corresponding to the 75% correct probability of discrimination is achieved by the statistical method. Comparisons with the real experimental result show that this method can give more accurate range prediction than the target acquisition (TA) model based on the MRTD.

Key words:

Field performance prediction Minimum resolvable temperature 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    [1]Gerald C.Holst. Electro-optical Imaging System Performance. America: JCD Publishing and SPIE Optical Engineering Press, Second Edition, (2000): 303–307.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    [2]L.Scott and R.Tomkinson, An Update on the C2NVEO FLIR90 and ACQUIRE sensor performance model. SPIE Proceedings, Vol.1488, pp 99–109, (1991).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    [3]G.R.Gerhart, T.Meitzler, E.J.Sohn, and H.Choe. The evaluation of ΔT Using Statistical Characteristics of the Target and Background. SPIE Proceedings, Vol.1969, pp11–20,(1993):.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    [4]Guo jing He, Jianqi Zhang. Virtual IR imaging guiding system model. Infrared and Laser Engineering. Vol.33 (4), (2004):338–342. (in chinese)Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    [5]Piet Bijl, J.Mathieu Valeton. Validation of the new triangle orientation discrimination method and ACQUIRE model predictions using observer performance data for ship targets. Opt.Eng.37 (7), (1998):1984–1994.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    [6]Christelle Garnier, Rene Collorec, Jihed Flifla, and Frank Rousee.General framework for infrared sensor modeling. SPIE Proceedings, Vol.3377, pp59–70, (1998).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    [7] Park S K, Rahman Z. Fidelity analysis of sampled imaging systems[J]. Optical Engineering.38(5), pp786–800,(1998).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    [8]J.D’Agostino&C.Webb, 3-D analysis framework and measurement methodology for imaging system noise, SPIE Proceedings, Vol.1488, pp110–121, (1991).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    [9]Christer Wigren. Model of image generation in optronic sensor systems(IGOSS). SPIE Proceedings, Vol.3377, pp89–96, (1999).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiao-rui Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Wei-bo Xie
    • 1
  • Hong-hua Chang
    • 1
  • Jian-qi Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Technical PhysicsXidian UniversityXi’an ShaanxiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Xi’an Institute of Applied OpticsXi’an ShaanxiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations