Living Monuments of the Second World War: Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Trees with Carvings

Article
  • 55 Downloads

Abstract

This paper discusses the results of terrestrial laser scanning combined with close range photogrammetry of the common beeches (Fagus sylvatica) covered in carvings (arborglyphs) dated to 1944 around Chycina, Poland. First, the archaeological research concerning heritage in the woodlands is shortly outlined using Polish archaeology as a case study. Then, the limitations of such research are pointed out. The last two parts of this paper present the beeches as a unique example of living monuments of the recent past. It is argued that archaeologies of the recent past in the woodlands will be gaining an increasing relevance in Polish as well as European archaeology.

Keywords

Archaeology of the recent past Monuments Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) Nature-culture 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Many people helped me during the research. I would like to thank Kornelia Kajda and Maksymilian Frąckowiak for joint research on the archaeology of tree carvings. Acknowledgements go also to the company “Gispro Sp. z o.o.” which scanned the trees with carvings near Chycina. Grzegosz Szalast from “ArchService” helped me with the visualizations of panels of the trees. Mikołaj Kostyrko gave me the permission to use the air photo (Fig. 2) in this article which was found during his research at the National Archives and Records Administration, USA. Sketchfab offered me a free account on its portal where the 3D models of trees can be viewed and approached by the public, for which I would like to thank. A big thank you to my wife Anna Kobiałka who graphically refined figures to this article. Last but not least, Kazimierz Raba kindly allowed me to use his installations created as part of the Signs of Nature, Signs of Culture (Fig. 5). Finally, I thank two anonymous reviewers for their careful reading of the manuscript and their many insightful comments and suggestions. However, I remain entirely responsible for any simplifications and errors.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ariosto, L. (2009). Orlando Furioso. Slavitt, D. R. (trans.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
  3. Bronner, S. J. (1985). Chain Carvers: Old Men Crafting Meaning. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington.Google Scholar
  4. Burström, M. and Gelderblom, B. (2009). Dealing with difficult heritage: the case of Bückeberg, site of the Third Reich harvest festival. Journal of Social Archaeology 11(3): 266–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burton, J. T. and Farrell, M. M. (2013). “Life in Manzanar where there is a spring breeze”: graffiti at a World War II Japanese American internment camp. In Mytum, H. and Carr, G. (eds.), Prisoners of War: Archaeology, Memory, and Heritage of 19th- and 20th-Century Mass Internment. Springer, New York, pp. 239–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Capps Tunwell, D., Passmore, D. G., and Harrison, S. (2015). Landscape archaeology of World War Two German logistics depots in the Forêt domaniale des Andaines, Normandy, France. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 19(2): 233–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casella, E. (2009). Written on the walls: inmate graffiti within places of confinement. In Beisaw, A. M. and Gibb, J. G. (eds.), The Archaeology of Institutional Life. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp. 172–186.Google Scholar
  8. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Sage Publications Ltd, London.Google Scholar
  9. Chmielewski, A. (2013). MRU. Historia i Współczesność. Wydawnictwo Literat, Międzyrzecz.Google Scholar
  10. Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and Difference. Bass, A. (trans.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  11. Edgeworth, M. (2011). Fluid Pasts: Archaeology of Flow. Bristol Classical Press, Bristol.Google Scholar
  12. Forte, M., Dell’Unto, N., Issavi, J., Onsurez, L., and Lercari, N. (2012). 3D archaeology at Çatalhöyük. International Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era 1(3): 351–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Giles, K. and Giles, M. (2010). Signs of the times: nineteenth- and twentieth-century graffiti in the farms of the Yorkshire words. In Oliver, J. and Neal, T. (eds.), Wild Sings: Graffiti in Archaeology and History. Archaeopress, Oxford, pp. 47–59.Google Scholar
  14. González-Ruibal, A. (2012). From the battlefield to the labour camp: archaeology of civil war and dictatorship in Spain. Antiquity 86(332): 456–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haraway, D. (2003). The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Prickly Paradigm Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  16. Harrison, R. (2013). Heritage: Critical Approaches. Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harrison, R. (2015). Beyond “natural” and “cultural” heritage: towards an ontological politics of heritage in the age of Anthropocene. Heritage and Society 8(1): 24–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herva, V. P. (2014). Haunting heritage in an enchanted land: magic, materiality and Second World War German material heritage in Finnish Lapland. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 1(2): 297–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hesse, R. (2013). The changing picture of archaeological landscapes: LiDAR prospection over very large areas as part of a cultural heritage strategy. In Opitz, R. S. and Cowley, D. C. (eds.), Interpreting Archaeological Topography. Oxbow Books, Oxford, pp. 171–183.Google Scholar
  20. Holden, N., Horne, P., and Bewley, R. (2002). High-resolution digital airborne mapping and archaeology. In Bawley, R. and Rączkowski, W. (eds.), Aerial Archaeology: Developing Future Practice NATO Science Series, sub-series I: Life and Behavioural Sciences, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 173–180.Google Scholar
  21. Holtorf, C. (2015a). Are we all archaeologists now? Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 2(2): 217–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holtorf, C. (2015b). Averting loss aversion in cultural heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies 21(4): 405–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Irlinger, W. and Suhr, G. (eds.) (2017). Archaeological Sites in Forests: Strategies for the Protection. Volk Verlag München, München.Google Scholar
  24. Jurga, G. and Kędryna, A. (2000). Festungsfront Oder-Warthe-Bogen. Katalog. Wydawnictwo Donjon, Cracow.Google Scholar
  25. Kajda, K. and Frąckowiak, M. (2017). Duchy miejsca – napisy (graffiti) w przestrzeniach publicznych i prywatnych jako przedmiot badań archeologii współczesnej przeszłości. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Archaeologica 32: 31–45.Google Scholar
  26. Karczewski, M. and Karczewska, M. (2014). Archeologia I wojny światowej na giżyckim odcinku frontu wschodniego. In Kempa, R. (ed.), Wielka Wojna na Mazurach 1914–1915. Studia z Dziejów Frontu Wschodniego I Wojny Światowej. Towarzystwo Miłośników Twierdzy Boyen, Giżycko, pp. 393–403.Google Scholar
  27. Knapp, H. D. and Fichtner, A. (2011). Beech Forests: Joint Natural Heritage of Europe. Bundesampt für naturschutz (BfN), Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Bonn.Google Scholar
  28. Knight, L. (2014). Reading Green in Early Modern England. Ashgate, Farnham.Google Scholar
  29. Kobiałka, D., Frąckowiak, M., and Kajda, K. (2015). Tree memories of the Second World War: a case study of common beeches from Chycina, Poland. Antiquity 89(345): 683–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kobiałka, D., Kostyrko, M., and Kajda, K. (2017a). The Great War and its landscapes between memory and oblivion: the case of prisoners of war camps in Tuchola and Czersk, Poland. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 21(1): 134–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kobiałka, D., Kajda, K., and Frąckowiak, M. (2017b). Wspomnienia drzew. Archeologia Żywa 3(65): 48–51.Google Scholar
  32. Konczewski, P., Konczewska, M., Sady, A., Szczurkowski, J., and Wroniecki, P. (2016a). Krajobraz kulturowy i paleoekologia Puszczy Zgorzeleckiej. Badania w lennictwach Toporów i Zabłocie. Śląskie Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 58: 199–226.Google Scholar
  33. Konczewski, P., Szczurowski, J., Wroniecki, P., Mackiewicz, M., and Zawadzki, P. (2016b). Projekt badawczy Tormersdorf-Toporów. Mieszkańcy, kultura i środowisko przyrodnicze zanikłego mikroregionu osadniczego na Górnych Łużycach. In Nocuń, P., Przybyła-Dumin, A., and Fokl, K. (eds.), Wieś Zaginiona. Stan i Perspektywy Badań. Muzeum “Górnośląski Park Etnograficznych w Chorzowie”, Chorzów, pp. 147–172.Google Scholar
  34. Kostyrko, M., Kajda, K., Wroniecki, P., and Lokś, A. (2016a). Archeologia nieinwazyjna w lesie. Prospekcja wczesnośredniowiecznego grodziska w Biedrzychowicach Dolnych woj. lubuskie. Śląskie Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 58: 85–99.Google Scholar
  35. Kostyrko, M., Kajda, K., Kobiałka, D., and Mlekuž, D. (2016b). An archaeological flight further than post-processualism – seeking a non-anthropocentric perspective. AARGnews: The Newsletter of the Aerial Archaeology Research Group 52: 71–79.Google Scholar
  36. Kujawka, E. (2016). Po drzewach. In Raba, K., Rozwadowski, A., and Gruszczyński, Ł. eds., Ślady. Spacer z Powidokiem. Uniwersytet Artystyczny w Poznaniu, Poznań, pp. 43–73.Google Scholar
  37. Latour, B. (1993). We have Never Been Modern. Porter, C. (trans.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  38. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  39. Lee, R. W. (1977). Names on Trees: Ariosto into Art. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  40. Lerma, J. L., Navarro, S., Cabrelles, M., and Villaerde, V. (2010). Terrestrial laser scanning and close range photogrammetry for 3D archaeological documentation: the Upper Paleolithic Cave of Parpalló as a case study. Journal of Archaeological Science 37(3): 499–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lo Brutto, M. and Meli, P. (2012). Computer vision tools for 3D modelling in archaeology. International Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era 1(1): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lovata, T. (2015). Marked trees: exploring the context of Southern Rocky Mountain arborglyphs. In Loyata, T. and Olton, E. (eds.), Understanding Graffiti. Multidisciplinary Studies from Prehistory to the Present. Routledge, London, pp. 91–104.Google Scholar
  43. Lovata, T. and Olton, E. (eds.) (2015). Understanding Graffiti: Multidisciplinary Studies from Prehistory to the Present. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  44. Małczyński, J. (2010). Trees as living monuments at the Museum-Memorial Site at Bełżec. In Majewski, T., Zeidler-Janiszewska, A., and Wójcik, M. (eds.), Memory of the Shoah: Cultural Representations and Commemorative Practices. Oficyna, Łódź, pp. 35–41.Google Scholar
  45. Mallea-Olaetxe, J. (2000). Speaking Through the Aspens: Basque Tree Carvings in California and Nevada. University of Nevada Press, Reno.Google Scholar
  46. Miniewicz, J. and Perzyk, B. (2012). Międzyrzecki Rejon Umocniony. Militaria Bogusława Perzyka, Warszawa.Google Scholar
  47. Oliver, J. and Neal, T. (2010). Elbow grease and time to spare: the place of tree carving. In Oliver, J. and Neal, T. (eds.), Wild Sings: Graffiti in Archaeology and History. Archaeopress, Oxford, pp. 15–22.Google Scholar
  48. Olsen, B. (2010). In Defense of Things: Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects. Altamira Press, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
  49. Olsen, B., Shanks, M., Webmoor, T., and Witmore, C. (2012). Archaeology: The Discipline of Things. University of California Press, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Passmore, D. G., Harrison, S., and Capps Tunwell, D. (2014). Second World War conflict archaeology in the forests of north-west Europe. Antiquity 88(342): 1275–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pearson, C. (2015). Beyond ‘resistance’. Rethinking nonhuman agency for a ‘more-than-human’ world. European Review of History/Revue Européenne d’Histoire 22(5): 709–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pétursdóttir, Þ. (2012). Small things forgotten now included, or what else do things deserve? International Journal of Historical Archaeology 16(3): 577–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pilichowski, C. (ed.) (1979). Obozy Hitlerowskie na Ziemiach Polskich 1939–1945. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa.Google Scholar
  54. Piovesan, G., Alessandrini, A., Baliva, M., Chiti, T., D’Andrea, E., De Cinti, B., Di Filippo, A., Hermanin, L., Lauteri, M., Scarascia Mugnozza, G., Schirone, B., Ziaco, E., and Matteucci, G. (2010). Structural patterns, growth processes, carbon stocks in an Italian network of old-growth beech forests. Italian Journal of Forest and Mountain Environments 65(5): 557–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shackel, P. A. and Chambers, E. (eds.) (2004). Places in Mind: Public Archaeology as Applied Anthropology. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  56. Shanks, M. (2007). Symmetrical archaeology. World Archaeology 39(4): 589–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shanks, M. (2008). Post-processual archeology and after. In Bentley, A. R., Maschner, H. D., and Chippindale, C. (eds.), Handbook of Archaeological Theories. Altamira Press, Lanham, pp. 133–144.Google Scholar
  58. Shanks, M. and Tilley, C. (1987). Re-constructing Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  59. Spring, A. P. and Peters, C. (2014). Developing a low cost 3D imaging solution for inscribed stone surface analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 52: 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Summerfield, C. (2010). Trees as a living museum: arborglyphs and conflict on Salisbury Plain. In Saunders, N. (ed.), Beyond the Dead Horizon: Studies in Modern Conflict Archaeology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 159–171.Google Scholar
  61. Thomas, J. (2004). Archaeology and Modernity. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  62. Tomanek, J. (1997). Botanika Leśna. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Rolnicze i Leśne, Warszawa.Google Scholar
  63. Trigger, B. (2006). A History of Archaeological Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wijnen, J. (2011). Sporen van de Tweede Wereldoorlog in het landschap. Vakblad Natuur Bos Landschap 5(8): 4–7.Google Scholar
  65. Witmore, C. (2017). Complexities and emergence: the case of Argos. In Knodell, A. R. and Leppard, T. P. (eds.), Regional Approaches to Society and Complexity, Equinox eBook Publishing, Sheffield, pp. 268–287.Google Scholar
  66. Wroniecki, P., Jaworski, M., and Kostyrko, M. (2015). Exploring free LiDAR derivatives. A user’s perspective on the potencial of readily available resources in Poland. Archaeologia Polona 53: 611–616.Google Scholar
  67. Zapłata, R. and Stefańczy, K. (2016). Puszcza Białowieska, LiDAR i dziedzictwo kulturowe – zagadnienia wstępne. Raport 11: 239–255.Google Scholar
  68. Zapłata, R., Szady, B., and Stefańczyk, K. eds. (2014). Laserowi Odkrywcy–Nieinwazyjne Badania i Dokumentowanie Obiektów Archeologicznych i Historycznych Województwa Świętokrzyskiego. Fundacja Centrum GeoHistorii, Babice.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Interdisciplinary Archaeological ResearchInstitute of Archaeology and Ethnography Polish Academy of SciencesWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations