Advertisement

International Journal of Historical Archaeology

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 472–491 | Cite as

Identity Destruction or Survival in Small Things? Rethinking Prisoner Tags from the Mauthausen Concentration Camp

  • Barbara Hausmair
Article
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

In concentration camps across Europe, replacing prisoners’ names with numbers was key to Nazi strategies for annihilating the identities of their victims. Number tags issued in the Mauthausen concentration camp are remembered by survivors as materializations of their destroyed identities and bureaucratic means in the murderous camp economy. However, several preserved tags carry prisoner-made decorations which point towards personalization strategies, making these items highly desired objects in current memorial practices for constructing narratives of survival. By taking an object-biographical approach, this chapter traces the ontological shifts the tags have gone through and discusses the relationships of camp life, the post-camp reading of material culture, and memorial practices.

Keywords

Mauthausen Prisoner number Camp life Personalization Memorial practice 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank Claudia Theune (University of Vienna) for sharing data from her “Archaeology of the Mauthausen concentration camp” project; the staff of the Mauthausen Memorial, the Hartheim Documentation Centre (especially Florian Schwanninger and Peter Eigelsberger), the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum and the Landesarchiv Oberösterreich for their great support during my research in their archives and collections; Isabella Greußing and Judith Benedix (University of Vienna) for supporting me during literature research and work with the Mauthausen Object Database; and Susan Pollock and Reinhard Bernbeck (Freie Universität Berlin) for many inspiring discussions, which had a great impact on this paper. This research was kindly supported by the EU FP7 Marie Curie Zukunftskolleg Incoming Fellowship Programme, University of Konstanz (grant no. 291784). All mistakes, misconceptions and errors remain my own.

References

  1. Aschenberg, H. (2002). Sprachterror: Kommunikation im nationalsozialistischen Konzentrationslager. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 118: 529–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Assmann, A. (2006). History, memory, and the genre of testimony. Poetics Today 27: 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baum, B. (1965). Die letzten Tage von Mauthausen, Deutscher Militärverlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  4. Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Bernbeck, R. (2015). “Framed Ambiguity”. Zum historiographischen Status der Dinge aus Grabungen in Konzentrationslagern und NS-Zwangsarbeitslagern. Historische Anthropologie 23: 413–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carr, G. (2011). Engraving and embroidering emotions upon the material culture of internment. In Myers, A., and Moshenska, G. (eds.), Archaeologies of Internment, Springer, New York, pp. 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dobosiewicz, S. (2007). Vernichtungslager Gusen, BMI, Wien.Google Scholar
  8. Fischer, N. (2015). Memory Work: The Second Generation, Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frankl, V. E. (2004). Man’s Search for Meaning: The Classic Tribute to Hope from the Holocaust, Rider, Reading.Google Scholar
  10. Freund, F., and Perz, B. (2006). Mauthausen – Stammlager/Außenlager. In Benz, W., and Distel, B. eds., Der Ort des Terrors. Geschichte der nationalsozialistischen Konzentrationslager Bd. 4: Flossenbürg, Mauthausen, Ravensbrück, Beck, München, pp. 293-470.Google Scholar
  11. Freund, F., Perz, B., and Blimlinger, E. (2000). Die Zahlenentwicklung der ausländischen Zwangsarbeiter und Zwangsarbeiterinnen auf dem Gebiet der Republik Österreich zwischen 1939-1945: Gutachten für die Historikerkommission der Republik Österreich, Institut für Zeitgeschichte der Universität Wien, Wien.Google Scholar
  12. Frîsṭer, R. (2007). The Cap: The Price of a Life, Grove Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Graf, M. (2015). Erinnerung erschreiben: Gender-Differenz in Texten von Auschwitz-Überlebenden, Campus Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Gosden, C., and Marshall, Y. (1999). The cultural biography of objects. World Archaeology 31: 169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hansen-Glucklich, J. (2014). Holocaust Memory Reframed: Museums and the Challenges of Representation, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.Google Scholar
  16. Haunschmied, R., Mills, J.-R., and Witzany-Durda, S. (2007). St. Georgen – Gusen – Mauthausen. Concentration Camp Mauthausen Reconsidered, Books in Demand, Norderstedt.Google Scholar
  17. Hausmair, B. (2016). Jenseits des “Sichtbarmachens”. Überlegungen zur Relevanz materieller Kultur für die Erforschung nationalsozialistischer Lager am Beispiel Mauthausen. In Kersting, T., Theune, C., and Drieschner, A. (eds.), Archäologie und Gedächtnis. NS-Lagerstandorte Erforschen – Bewahren – Vermitteln. Denkmalpflege in Berlin und Brandenburg Arbeisthefte 4, Imhof Verlag, Petersberg, pp. 31–45.Google Scholar
  18. Holzinger, G. (ed.) (2013). Das Konzentrationslager Mauthausen 1938-1945. Katalog zur Ausstellung in der KZ-Gedenkstätte Mauthausen, New Academic Press, Wien.Google Scholar
  19. Klimesch, W. (2002). Veritatem dies aperit. Vernichtet – Vergraben – Vergessen. Archäologische Spurensuche im Schloss Hartheim. Jahrbuch des Oberösterreichischen Musealvereins 147: 411–434.Google Scholar
  20. Kopytoff, I. (1986). The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process. In Appadurai, A. (ed.), The Social Life of Things. Commodities in Cultural Perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 64–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kranebitter, A. (2007). Der Faschismus in den Daten: Probleme der Datenlage in Bezug auf das KZ Mauthausen. Forschung – Dokumentation – Information KZ-Gedenkstätte Mauthausen 2007: 12-21.Google Scholar
  22. Levi, P. (1990). Die Untergegangenen und die Geretteten, Carl Hanser, München.Google Scholar
  23. Levi, P. (2013). If This Is a Man/The Truce, Abacus, London.Google Scholar
  24. Madoń-Mitzner, K. (2010). Errettet aus Mauthausen. Berichte polnischer ehemaliger Häftlinge des NS-Konzentrationslagers Mauthausen-Gusen, Haus der Begegnung mit Geschichte, Zentrum Karta, Stiftung “Polnisch-Deutsche Aussöhnung”, Warszawa.Google Scholar
  25. Maršálek, H. (1995). Die Geschichte des Konzentrationslagers Mauthausen, Steindl-Druck, Wien.Google Scholar
  26. McNally, R. J. (2005). Remembering Trauma, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  27. Myers, A. (2007). Portable material culture and death factory Auschwitz. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 18: 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Perz, B. (2006). Die KZ-Gedenkstätte Mauthausen: 1945 bis zur Gegenwart, Studien-Verlag, Innsbruck.Google Scholar
  29. Piljar, J. (1964). In Wahrheit war ich siebzehn, Verlag Neues Leben, Berlin.Google Scholar
  30. Pollock, S., and Bernbeck, R. (2015). A gate to a darker world: excavating at the Tempelhof Airport. In González-Ruibal, A., and Moshenska, G. (eds.), Ethics and the Archaeology of Violence, Springer, New York, pp. 137–152.Google Scholar
  31. Pollock, S. and Bernbeck, R. (2017). The limits of experience: suffering, Nazi forced labor camps and archaeology. In Hegmon, M. ed., The Archaeology of the Human Experience, Springer, New York, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  32. Portelli, A. (2003). The Death of Luigi Trastulli and Other Stories: Form and Meaning in Oral History, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell.Google Scholar
  33. Schütze, M. (2013). Löffel, Zigarettenetui, Erkennungsmarke – Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Analyse von Dingen aus dem Konzentrationslager Mauthausen. Master's thesis, Universität Wien, Wien.Google Scholar
  34. Schwanninger, F. (2011). Hartheim. In Morsch, G., and Perz, P. (eds.), Neue Studien zu nationalsozialistischen Massentötungen durch Giftgas, Metropol, Berlin, pp. 118–130.Google Scholar
  35. Sofsky, W. (1997). The Order of Terror: The Concentration Camp, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  36. Starzmann, M. T. (2014). Excavating Tempelhof airfield: objects of memory and the politics of absence. Rethinking History 18: 211–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Suderland, M. (2013). Inside Concentration Camps: Social Life at the Extremes, Reprint ed, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  38. Theune, C. (2010). Historical archaeology in National Socialist concentration camps in Central Europe. Historische Archäologie 2: 1–14.Google Scholar
  39. Theune, C. (2014). Archäologie an Tatorten des 20. Jahrhunderts. Archäologie in Deutschland Sonderheft 6, Theiss, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  40. Young, J. E. (1993). The Texture of Memory: Holocaust Memorials and Meaning, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar

Primary sources

  1. AMM Box 6/BMI Gz39.020-9-54. Proposal of the French Ministère des anciens combattants et victimes de guerre for the exhumation of Mauthausen and Gusen victims. 1952.Google Scholar
  2. AMM Box 6/BMI Gz148.831-9-56. Memorandum on the preparations of exhumations at Mauthausen and Gusen by the French Ministère des anciens combattants et victimes de guerre. 1955.Google Scholar
  3. AMM Box 7/ 251.712-33/66. Protocol of the exhumations of the Marbach mass grave. 1966.Google Scholar
  4. AMM Box 7/ 251.712-33/ 69. Notification on the identification and reburial of bodies from the Marbach mass grave. March 3, 1968.Google Scholar
  5. AMM E/10/20. List of tags recovered from the Marbach mass grave. August 14, 1969.Google Scholar
  6. AMM HDB. Inmate database of the MM, containing basic data on approximately 130,000 inmates including records such as name, prisoner number, place and date of birth, nationality, admittance to the camp, transfers to other camps, and date and cause of death as recorded in the camp’s preserved registry and death books. Last accessed December 11, 2014.Google Scholar
  7. AMM ODB. Object database of the MM, containing data on portable material culture from Mauthausen and its sub-camps. Last accessed October 26, 2016.Google Scholar
  8. ITS 1.1.26.1/0267A/1319029-33. List of tags recovered from mass graves at the Gunskirchen sub-camp. 1979.Google Scholar
  9. OÖLA Sonderbestände Exhumierung Gusen. C. 3,000 form sheets of exhumations in the former concentration camps of Mauthausen and Gusen conducted by the French Red Cross. 1955/1956.Google Scholar
  10. USHMM RG-50.549.02*0061. Transcript of interview with survivor Morris Kornberg. September 27, 1999.Google Scholar
  11. USHMM RG-50.562*0009. Transcript of interviews with survivor Avraham Kimmelman. December 31, 2004; June 5, 2005; July 1, 2005.Google Scholar
  12. USHMM RG-67.010M. Microfilms of the Mauthausen death books. 1939–1945.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Ancient Near Eastern ArchaeologyFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations