International Journal of Historical Archaeology

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 713–730 | Cite as

Health Consequences of Contact on Two Seventeenth-Century Native Groups from the Mid-Atlantic Region of Maryland

Article

Abstract

This study examined the skeletal remains of two different native groups, the Piscataway (Algonquian) and the Susquehannock (Iroquoian), who resided in close geographic proximity in the Tidewater-Potomac region of Maryland in order to understand their health during the 1,600 s CE. Both groups had differing interactions with colonial settlers and numerous historic accounts of violence. The results show some evidence of infectious disease and no types of interpersonal violence on the skeletal remains of either group. Other health disparities found were associated more with cultural and behavioral differences between these two ethnic groups than with direct colonial involvement.

Keywords

Bioarchaeology European contact Treponemal infection St. Mary’s City Bacon’s rebellion 

References

  1. Alchon, S. (2003). A Pest in the Land: New World Epidemics in a Global Perspective, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
  2. Aufderheide, A., and Rodriguez-Martin, C. (1998). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Paleopathology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  3. Axelrod, A. (1993). Chronicle of the Indian Wars: From Colonial Times to Wounded Knee, Prentice Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, B. (1994). Pilgrim’s Progress and Praying Indians: The Biocultural Consequences of Contact in Southern New England. In Larsen, C., and Milner, G. (eds.), In the Wake of Contact: Biological Responses to Contact, Wiley-Liss, New York, pp. 34–45.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, B., and Kealhofer, L. (eds.) (1996). Bioarchaeology of Native American Adaptation in the Spanish Borderlands, University of Florida Press, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  6. Bass, W. (1981). Human Osteology: A Laboratory and Field Manual of the Human Skeleton, Missouri Archaeological Society, Columbia.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, S. K. (2012). Using generalized estimating equations to evaluate activity in human skeletal remains. Paper presented at the International Conference on Advances in Interdisciplinary Statistics and Combinatorics, AISC 2012, Greensboro, NC.Google Scholar
  8. Brashler, J. (1987). A middle 16th century Susquehannock village in Hampshire County, West Virginia. West Virginia Archaeology 39: 1–30.Google Scholar
  9. Buikstra, J. (1992). Diet and Disease in Late Prehistory. In Verano, J., and Ubelaker, D. (eds.), Disease and Demography in the Americas, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 87–101.Google Scholar
  10. Buikstra, J., and Ubelaker, D. (eds.) (1994). Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains, Arkansas Archaeological Survey, Fayetteville.Google Scholar
  11. Curry, D. (1999). Feast of the Dead: Aboriginal Ossuaries in Maryland, Archeological Society of Maryland and Maryland Historical Trust Press, Myersville.Google Scholar
  12. Ferguson, A. (1941). The susquehannock fort on Piscataway creek. Maryland Historical Magazine 36: 1–9.Google Scholar
  13. Ferguson, A., and Ferguson, H. (1960). The Piscataway Indians of Southern Maryland, Alice Ferguson Foundation, Accokeek.Google Scholar
  14. Ferguson, A., and Stewart, T. (1940). An ossuary near Piscataway creek. American Antiquity 6: 4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frayer, D. (1997). Ofnet: Evidence for a Mesolithic Massacre. In Martin, D., and Frayer, D. (eds.), Troubled Times: Violence and Warfare in the Past, Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  16. Gagnon, C. (2004a). Food and the state: bioarchaeological investigations of diet in the Moche Valley of Peru. Dental Anthropology Journal 17: 45–54.Google Scholar
  17. Gagnon, C. (2004b). Stability within the context of change: native American health during contact in the lower Susquehanna Valley, Pennsylvania. Archaeology of Eastern North America 32: 101–121.Google Scholar
  18. Gagnon, C. (2006). Daily Life and the Development of the State in the Moche Valley of North Coastal Peru: A Bioarchaeological Analysis. Doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  19. Gagnon, C. M., and Wiesen, C. (2011). Using general estimating equations to analyze oral health in the Moche Valley of Perú. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. forthcoming.Google Scholar
  20. Gallatin, A. (1973 [1836]). Synopsis of the Indian tribes within the United States east of the Rocky Mountains and in the British and Russian possessions in North America. AMS Press, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Goodman, A., Martinez, C., and Chavez, A. (1991). Nutritional supplementation and the development of linear enamel hypoplasias in children from Tezonteopan, Mexico. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 53: 773–781.Google Scholar
  22. Guilday, J. E., Parmalee, P. W., and Tanner, D. P. (1962). Aboriginal butchering techniques at the Eschelman Site (36 La 12), Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Archaeologist 32: 59–83.Google Scholar
  23. Hall, C. (ed.) (1910). Narratives of Early Maryland: 1633–1684, Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Jennings, F. (1966). The Indian trade of the Susquehanna Valley. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 110: 406–424.Google Scholar
  25. Jennings, F. (1968). Glory, death, and transfiguration: the Susquehannock Indians in the seventeenth century. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 112: 15–53.Google Scholar
  26. Jennings, F. (1978). Susquehannock. In Trigger, B. (ed.), Handbook of North American Indians: Northeast, vol. 15, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 362–367.Google Scholar
  27. Jennings, F. (1982). Indians and frontiers in seventeenth-century Maryland. In Quinn, D. (ed.), Early Maryland in a Wider World, Wayne State University Press, Detroit, pp. 216–241.Google Scholar
  28. Jennings, F. (1984). The Ambiguous Iroquois Empire: The Covenant Chain of Indian Tribes with English Colonies, Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Kellock, K. (1962). Colonial Piscataway in Maryland, Alice Ferguson Foundation, Accokeek.Google Scholar
  30. Kent, B. (1984). Susquehanna’s Indians, Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, Harrisburg.Google Scholar
  31. King, J. A., and Chaney, E. E. (2004). Did the Chesapeake English have a contact period? In Dennis, J. A. K., and Blanton, B. (eds.), Indian and European Contact in Context: The Mid-Atlantic Region, University Press of Florida, Gainesville, pp. 193–221.Google Scholar
  32. Krugler, J. D. (2004). The Calvert vision: a new model for church-state relations. Maryland Historical Magazine Fall. 269–286.Google Scholar
  33. Lambert, P. (1994). War and Peace on the Western Frontier: A Study of Violent Conflict and Its Correlates in Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherer Societies of Coastal Southern California. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  34. Land, A. (1981). Colonial Maryland: A History, KTO Press, Millwood.Google Scholar
  35. Larsen, C. (1985). Dental modifications and tool use in the western Great Basin. American Journal of Physical Anthroplogy 67: 393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Larsen, C. (1991). On the frontier of contact: mission bioarchaeology in La Florida. Florida Anthropology 44: 268–284.Google Scholar
  37. Larsen, C. (1997). Bioarchaeology: Interpreting Behavior from the Human Skeleton, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Larsen, C. (ed.) (2001). Bioarchaeology of Spanish Florida, University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  39. Larsen, C., and Milner, G. (eds.) (1994). In the Wake of Contact: Biological Responses to Contact, Wiley-Liss, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Larsen, C., Griffin, M., Hutchinson, D., Noble, V., Norr, L., Pastor, R., Ruff, C., Russell, K., Schoeninger, M., Schultz, M., Simpson, S., and Teaford, M. (2001). Frontiers of contact: bioarchaeology of Spanish Florida. Journal of World Prehistory 15: 69–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Layrisse, M., Martinez-Torres, C., and Roche, M. (1968). Effect of interaction of various foods on iron absorption. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 21: 1175–1183.Google Scholar
  42. Liang, K., and Scott, L. (1986). Data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73: 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Loren, D. D. (2008). In Contact: Bodies and Spaces in the Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century Eastern Woodlands, AltaMira Press, Lanham.Google Scholar
  44. Maniez, E. (1994). Piscataway Creek to Point of Rocks: The Decline of an Empire, Brunswick Railroad Museum, Brunswick.Google Scholar
  45. Menard, R., and Carr, L. (1982). The Lords Baltimore and the Colonization of Maryland. In Quinn, D. (ed.), Early Maryland in a Wider World, Wayne State University Press, Detroit, pp. 167–215.Google Scholar
  46. Milner, G., and Larsen, C. (1991). Teeth as Artifacts of Human Behavior: Intentional Mutilation and Accidental Modification. In Kelley, M., and Larsen, C. (eds.), Advances in Dental Anthropology, Wiley-Liss, New York, pp. 357–378.Google Scholar
  47. Miner, H. (1939). Parallelism in alkaloid-alkali quids. American Anthropologist 41: 617–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. National Institutes of Health (2002). Facts about dietary supplements. http://www.Cc.Nih.Gov/Ccc/Supplements/Iron.Html.
  49. Ortner, D. (2003). Identification of Pathological Conditions in Human Skeletal Remains, 2nd ed, Academic, San Diego.Google Scholar
  50. Ortner, D., and Putschar, W. (1985). Identification of Pathological Conditions in Human Skeletal Remains, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  51. Peasley, W. (1910) [1635]. A relation of Maryland. In Narratives of Early Maryland: 1633–1684. Hall, C. (eds). Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, pp. 1–73.Google Scholar
  52. Porter, F. (1979). Indians in Maryland and Delaware, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  53. Potter, S. (1980). A Review of Archeological Resources in Piscataway Park, Maryland, National Park Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  54. Potter, S. (1993). Commoners, Tribute, and Chiefs: The Development of Algonquian Culture in the Potomac Valley, University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville.Google Scholar
  55. Ramenofsky, A. (1987). Vectors of Death: The Archaeology of European Contact, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
  56. Reinhard, K. (1992). Patterns of Diet, Parasitism and Anemia in Prehistoric West North America. In Stuart-Macadam, P., and Kent, S. (eds.), Diet, Demography, and Disease, Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp. 219–258.Google Scholar
  57. Silliman, S. (2005). Culture contact or colonialism? Challenges in the archaeology of Native North America. American Antiquity 70: 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Simon, S. K. (2003). The Effect of Chiefdom Formation on the Health of Aboriginal Populations in the Chesapeake Bay Area of Maryland and Virginia. Master’s thesis, California State University, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  59. Simon, S. K., and Gagnon, C. M. (2005). The effect of migration on the dental and skeletal health of protohistoric and early historic Susquehannock Indians (AD 1575–1675). American Journal of Physical Anthroplogy 126: 191.Google Scholar
  60. Smith, J. (1986 [1624]). The generall historie of Virginia, New England, and the Summer Isles. In The Complete Works of Captain John Smith, Vol. 3. Barbour, P. (ed.). University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, pp. 25–487.Google Scholar
  61. Steele, D., and Branblett, C. (1988). The Anatomy and Biology of the Human Skeleton, Texas A&M University Press, College Station.Google Scholar
  62. Steinbock, R. (1976). Paleopathological Diagnosis and Interpretation, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield.Google Scholar
  63. Stephenson, R., Ferguson, A., and Ferguson, H. (1963). The Accokeek Creek Site: A Middle Atlantic Seaboard Cultural Sequence, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  64. Toogood, A. (1969). Piscataway Park: General Historic Background Study, Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  65. Ubelaker, D. (1974). Reconstruction of Demographic Profiles from Ossuary Skeletal Samples: A Case Study from the Tidewater Potomac, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  66. Verano, J., and Ubelaker, D. (eds.) (1992). Disease and Demography in the Americas, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  67. Vogel, J., and Van Der Merwe, N. (1977). Isotopic evidence for early maize cultivation in New York State. American Antiquity 42: 238–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Walker, P. (1986). Porotic hyperostosis in a marine-dependant California population. American Journal of Physical Anthroplogy 69: 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Webb, S. S. (1995). 1676: The End of American Independence, Syracuse University Press, Syracuse.Google Scholar
  70. White, T. (1991). Human Osteology, Academic, San Diego.Google Scholar
  71. Winter, J. C. (2001a). Introduction to the American Tobacco Species. In Winter, J. C. (ed.), Tobacco Use by Native North Americans: Sacred Smoke and Silent Killer, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, pp. 3–8.Google Scholar
  72. Winter, J. C. (2001b). Traditional Uses of Tobacco by Native Americans. In Winter, J. C. (ed.), Tobacco Use by Native North Americans: Sacred Smoke and Silent Killer, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, pp. 3–8.Google Scholar
  73. Wood, J., Milner, G., Harpending, H., and Weiss, K. (1992). The osteological paradox: problems of inferring prehistoric health from skeletal samples. Current Anthropology 33: 343–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Behavioral SciencesYork College of PennsylvaniaYorkUSA

Personalised recommendations