This case study focused on the robotics learning process of Mark (a pseudonym), a Latino-American second grader diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Drawing on Polanyi’s (Personal knowledge: towards a post-critical philosophy [Kindle version], 1958/2015) notion of “tacit knowing” and “dwelling in tools,” we attempted to understand Mark’s unique processes and ways of engaging in learning about a Light Sensor by pursuing two research questions: (a) How does Mark, with his unique behavioral and socio-emotional characteristics, engage in the robotics class? (b) What insights can we gain from his inquiry as we develop responsive robotics education? Findings revealed that Mark used a non-sequential inquiry process filled with repetitive free explorations and unexpected expanded inquiries about the Light Sensor. This non-sequential inquiry process highlighted that dwelling with robotic manipulatives was Mark’s distinct ways of exploring the Light Sensor. His non-sequential inquiry process emerged from his tacit engagement and expanded to his sophisticated and holistic understanding of the Light Sensor. We discuss implications for a robotics education program that is responsive to young children with diverse needs and characteristics.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
All names of people in this manuscript are pseudonyms.
Adair, J. K. (2014). Agency and expanding capabilities in early grade classrooms: What it could mean for young children. Harvard Educational Review,84(2), 217–241.
Alimisis, D. (2013). Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges. Themes in Science and Technology Education,6(1), 63–71.
Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems,75, 661–670.
Barakova, E. I., Bajracharya, P., Willemsen, M., Lourens, T., & Huskens, B. (2015). Long-term LEGO therapy with humanoid robot for children with ASD. Expert Systems,32(6), 698–709.
Berry, C. A., Remy, S. L., & Rogers, T. E. (2016). Robotics for all ages: A standard robotics curriculum for K-16. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine,23(2), 40–46.
Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education,72, 145–157.
Chandra, V. (2014). Developing students’ technological literacy through robotics activities. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years,22(3), 24–29.
Cho, S. J., & Ahn, D. H. (2016). Socially assistive robotics in autism spectrum disorder. Hanyang Medical Reviews,36(1), 17–26.
Douglass, R., & Moustakas, C. (1985). Heuristic inquiry: The internal search to know. Journal of Humanistic Psychology,25(3), 39–55.
Duguid, P. (2005). “The art of knowing”: Social and tacit dimensions of knowledge and the limits of the community of practice. The Information Society,21(2), 109–118.
Eguchi, A. (2014). Robotics as a learning tool for educational transformation. In the 4th International Workshop Teaching Robotics. Paper presented at Teaching with Robotics & 5th International Conference Robotics in Education (pp. 27–34). Padova.
Elkin, M., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2014). Implementing a robotics curriculum in an early childhood Montessori classroom. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice,13, 153–169.
Gerde, H. K., Schachter, R. E., & Wasik, B. A. (2013). Using the scientific method to guide learning: An integrated approach to early childhood curriculum. Early Childhood Education Journal,41(5), 315–323.
Gourlay, S. (2002). Tacit knowledge, tacit knowing, or behaving? Retrieved from http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/2293/1/Gourlay%202002%20tacit%20knowledge.pdf.
Grant, K. A. (2007). Tacit knowledge revisited—we can still learn from Polanyi. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management,5(2), 173–180.
Graue, M. E., & Walsh, D. J. (1998). Studying children in context: Theories, methods, and ethics. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Heath, C., Luff, P., & Svensson, M. S. (2007). Video and qualitative research: Analyzing medical practice and interaction. Medical Education,41(1), 109–116.
Hodson, D. (2014). Learning science, learning about science, doing science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education,36(15), 2534–2553.
Huskens, B., Verschuur, R., Gillesen, J., Didden, R., & Barakova, E. (2013). Promoting question-asking in school-aged children with autism spectrum disorders: Effectiveness of a robot intervention compared to a human-trainer intervention. Developmental Neurorehabilitation,16(5), 345–356.
Johnson, J. (2003). Children, robotics, and education. Artificial Life and Robotics,7(1–2), 16–21.
Jung, S. E., & Won, E. S. (2018). Systematic review of research trends in robotics education for young children. Sustainability,10(4), 1–24.
Kats, Y., & Kuhn, J. (2015). Robotics-based course design for autism spectrum disorder. In S. Carliner, C. Fulford & N. Ostashewski (Eds.), EdMedia. Paper Presented at World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 1010–1015). Montreal: AACE.
Kazakoff, E. R., & Bers, M. U. (2014). Put your robot in, put your robot out: Sequencing through programming robots in early childhood. Journal of Educational Computing Research,50(4), 553–573.
Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology,1(3), 138–147.
Lee, O., & Buxton, C. A. (2010). Diversity and equity in science education: Research, policy, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Legare, H., Gose, R., & Guess, C. (2015). Examining the development of scientific reasoning in context. In D. M. Sobel & J. L. Jipson (Eds.), Cognitive development in museum settings: Relating research and practice (pp. 138–156). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.
Mayer, D., Sodian, B., Koerber, S., & Schwippert, K. (2014). Scientific reasoning in elementary school children: Assessment and relations with cognitive abilities. Learning and Instruction,29, 43–55.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington: National Academies Press.
Nemiro, J., Larriva, C., & Jawaharlal, M. (2015). Developing creative behavior in elementary school students with robotics. The Journal of Creative Behavior,51(1), 70–90.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington: The National Academies Press.
Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education,25(2), 177–196.
Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I. E. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1–11). Norwood: Ablex Publishing.
Piaget, J. (1973). The psychology of intelligence. Totowa: Littlefield, Adams and Cooperation.
Polanyi, M. (1958/2015). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy [Kindle version]. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/97802262332768.001.0001.
Polanyi, M. (1962). Tacit knowing: Its bearing on some problems of philosophy. Philosophy Today, 6(4), 239–262.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Rusk, N., Resnick, M., Berg, R., & Pezalla-Granlund, M. (2008). New pathways into robotics: Strategies for broadening participation. Journal of Science Education and Technology,17, 59–69.
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Savard, A., & Freiman, V. (2016). Investigating complexity to assess student learning from a robotics-based task. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education,2(2), 93–114.
Schön, D. A. (1995). Knowing-in-action: The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning,27(6), 27–34.
Somyürek, S. (2015). An effective educational tool: Construction kits for fun and meaningful learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,25(1), 25–41.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Sullivan, A., Kazakoff, E. R., & Bers, M. U. (2013). The wheels on the bot go around and round: Robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten. Journal of Information Technology Education,12, 203–219.
Sveiby, K. E. (1996). Transfer of knowledge and the information processing professions. European Management Journal,14(4), 379–388.
Varelas, M., Kane, J. M., & Wylie, C. D. (2011). Young African American children’s representations of self, science, and school: Making sense of difference. Science Education, 95(5), 824–851.
Visser, W. (2010). Schön: Design as a reflective practice. Art & design & psychology. Retrieved from https://hal.inria.fr/file/index/docid/604634/filename/Visser_Collection2_Schoen.pdf.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wainer, J., Robins, B., Amirabdollahian, F., & Dautenhahn, K. (2014). Using the humanoid robot KASPAR to autonomously play triadic games and facilitate collaborative play among children with autism. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development,6(3), 183–199.
Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park: SAGE.
Zaharija, G., Mladenović, S., & Boljat, I. (2015). Use of robots and tangible programming for informal computer science introduction. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,174, 3878–3884.
Zion, M., & Mendelovici, R. (2012). Moving from structured to open inquiry: Challenges and limits. Science Education International,23(4), 383–399.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Jung, S.E., Lee, K., Cherniak, S. et al. Non-sequential Learning in a Robotics Class: Insights from the Engagement of a Child with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Tech Know Learn 25, 63–81 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9394-8
- Early childhood robotics education
- Autism spectrum disorder
- Non-sequential learning
- Tacit engagement