Virtual Reality-Based Technologies in Dental Medicine: Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice Among Students and Practitioners
Abstract
Virtual reality-based technologies have been used in dentistry for almost two decades. Dental simulators, planning software and CAD/CAM (computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing) systems have significantly developed over the years and changed both dental education and clinical practice. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practice of VRBT among dental students and educators in one European dental school using a paper-based questionnaire and the KAP among students and dental practitioners from 35 countries using an online survey. Dental students, educators and practitioners have overall positive attitudes towards VRBT but very few have used VRBT in education and practice. The majority of respondents plan to use VRBT in their future clinical practice and believe that those technologies will be widely adopted by dental practices within 22 years. Learning about VRBT and using them as part of undergraduate and continued education programmes could affect dental practitioners’ willingness to implement new technologies and enhance critical assessment of new trends in dentistry.
Keywords
Virtual reality-based technology Dental simulators Digital impressions Haptic technology 3D googles Treatment planning softwareAbbreviations
- VRBT
Virtual reality-based technology
- KAP
Knowledge, attitude, practice
Notes
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Josipa Kern for guidance in designing the questionnaire and Patricia Reynolds for comments on the manuscript.
References
- Bisler, A., Bockholt, U., Kordass, B., Suchan, M., & Voss, G. (2002). The virtual articulator. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry, 5(2–3), 101–106.Google Scholar
- Bootvong, K., Liu, Z., McGrath, C., Hägg, U., Wong, R. W., Bendeus, M., et al. (2010). Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: Reliability and validity. European Journal of Orthodontics, 32(5), 589–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Buchanan, J. A. (2001). Use of simulation technology in dental education. Journal of Dental Education, 65(11), 1225–1231.Google Scholar
- Curnier, F. (2010). Teaching dentistry by means of virtual reality-the Geneva project. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry, 13(3), 251–263.Google Scholar
- Dută, M., Amariei, C. I., Bogdan, C. M., Popovici, D. M., Ionescu, N., & Nuca, C. (2011). An overview of virtual and augmented reality in dental education. Oral Health and Dental Management, 10(1), 42–49.Google Scholar
- Elian, N., Jalbout, Z. N., Classi, A. J., Wexler, A., Sarment, D., & Tarnow, D. P. (2008). Precision of flapless implant placement using real-time surgical navigation: A case series. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 23(6), 1123–1127.Google Scholar
- Ghanai, S., Marmulla, R., Wiechnik, J., Mühling, J., & Kotrikova, B. (2010). Computer-assisted three-dimensional surgical planning: 3D virtual articulator: technical note. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 39(1), 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hoffman, H. G., Garcia-Palacios, A., Patterson, D. R., Jensen, M., Furness, T. I. I. I., & Ammons, W. F., Jr. (2004). The effectiveness of virtual reality for dental pain control: A case study. CyberPsychology and Behavior., 4(4), 527–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lee, S. J., & Gallucci, G. O. (2013). Digital versus conventional implant impressions: Efficiency outcomes. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 24(1), 111–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Luciano, C., Banerjee, P., & DeFanti, T. (2009). Haptics-based virtual reality periodontal training simulator. Virtual Reality, 2(13), 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lund, B., Fors, U., Sejersen, R., Sallnäs, E. L., & Rosén, A. (2011). Student perception of two different simulation techniques in oral and maxillofacial surgery undergraduate training. BMC Medical Education, 11(1), 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maestre-Ferrín, L., Romero-Millán, J., Peñarrocha-Oltra, D., & Peñarrocha-Diago, M. (2012). Virtual articulator for the analysis of dental occlusion: An update. Medicina Oral Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal, 17(1), 160–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miyazaki, T., Hotta, Y., Kunii, J., Kuriyama, S., & Tamaki, Y. (2009). A review of dental CAD/CAM: Current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dental Materials Journal, 28(1), 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nkenke, E., Vairaktaris, E., Bauersachs, A., Eitner, S., Budach, A., Knipfer, C., et al. (2012). Acceptance of virtual dental implant planning software in an undergraduate curriculum: A pilot study. BMC Medical Education, 12(1), 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Orentlicher, G., & Abboud, M. (2011). Guided surgery for implant therapy. Dental Clinics of North America, 55(4), 715–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sablek, A. (2013). Third virtual world congress of dental students. ADEE (Association for Dental Education in Europe) Newsletter, 9(2), 6.Google Scholar
- San Diego, J.P., Cox, M.J., Green, T.A. & Newton, T. (2010). Haptic technology enhanced learning: HapTEL, Student attitudes towards using a haptic learning tool. Resource document. Economic and Social Research Council, http://www.researchcatalogue.esrc.ac.uk/grants/RES-139-25-0387/outputs/read/d2fcbf1a-fad1-493c-85f6-a3dd4087cb06 Accessed 29 Feb 2016.
- Vervoorn, J.M. & Wesselink, P.R. (2009). The perception of the level of realism of a dental training simulator (Simodont). Resource document (poster). Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam. http://www.acta.nl/en/studying-at-acta/student-services/simodont/contact-links/index.asp. Accessed 29 Feb 2016.