Advertisement

Technology, Knowledge and Learning

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 147–158 | Cite as

Academic Versus Non-academic Emerging Adult College Student Technology Use

  • Joan Ann Swanson
  • Erica Walker
Article
First Online:

Abstract

Emerging adult college students have developmental and educational needs which are unique to their phase of life. Emerging adults are also increasingly identified by their technology use and practices. Collegiate instructors will be better equipped for educating these individuals when armed with insights concerning emerging adults’ technology related practices. The purpose of this study is to examine academic and non-academic technology use by emerging adult college students. Survey results (N = 235) provide insights into emerging adult college student technology preferences and frequency of use for academic and non-academic purposes. This study found that emerging adult college students have distinct technology preferences and practices relating to both academic and non-academic use, and prefer contextualization of technology accordingly.

Keywords

Technology Emerging adults College Instruction 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. APA Work Group of the Board of Educational Affairs. (1997). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school reform and redesign. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  2. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnett, J. J. (2007). Emerging adulthood: What is it, and what is it good for? Child Development Perspectives, 1(2), 68–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnett, J. J. (2011). Emerging adulthood(s): The cultural psychology of a new life stage. In L. A. Jensen (Ed.), Bridging cultural and developmental approaches to psychology: New syntheses in theory, research, and policy (pp. 255–275). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Arnett, J. J., & Schwab, J. (2012). The Clark University poll of emerging adults: Thriving, struggling, and hopeful. Worcester, MA: Clark University.Google Scholar
  6. Baker, W. M., Lusk, E. J., & Neuhauser, K. L. (2012). On the use of cell phones and other electronic devices in the classroom: Evidence from a survey of faculty and students. Journal of Education for Business, 87(5), 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barkley, E. F. (2010). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Franscico, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 26, 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. F. (2012). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  10. Busha, C. H., & Harter, S. P. (1980). Research methods in librarianship: Techniques and interpretation. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cassidy, E. D., Britsch, J., Griffin, G., Manolovitz, T., Shen, L., & Turney, L. (2011). Higher education and emerging technologies: Student usage, preferences, and lessons for library services. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 50, 380–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. D’Angelo, J. M., & Woosley, S. A. (2007). Technology in the classroom: Friend or foe. Education, 127(4), 462–471.Google Scholar
  13. Dahlstrom, E., Walker, J. D., & Dziuban, C. (2013). ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology (research report). Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research. http://educause.edu/ecar. Accessed 15 July 2014.
  14. Flowers, S. M. (2014). A philosophy for teaching and learning in emerging adulthood. New Horizons for Learning, 11(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  15. Geng, G. (2013). Investigating the use of text messages in mobile learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glenn, M. (2008). The future of higher education: How technology will shape learning. Economist Intelligence Unit, New Media Consortium. http://www.nmc.org/pdf/Future-of-Higher-Ed-(NMC).pdf. Accessed 29 Jan 2015.
  17. Gonzalez-DeHass, A. R., & Willems, P. P. (2013). Theories in educational psychology: Concise guide to meaning and practice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  18. Gorra, A., et al. (2010). Learning with technology: What do students want? In Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Learning (p. 126). Porto, Portugal.Google Scholar
  19. Green, H., & Hannon, C. (2007). Their space: Education for a digital generation, Demos. http://www.demos.co.uk/files/Their%20space%20-%20web.pdf. Accessed 29 Jan 2015.
  20. Jackson, L. D. (2013). Is mobile technology in the classroom a helpful tool or a distraction?: A report of university students’ attitudes, usage practices, and suggestions for policies. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge, and Society, 8, 129–140.Google Scholar
  21. Jacobs, G. E., Castek, J., Pizzolato, A., Reder, S., & Pendell, K. (2014). Production and consumption; A closer look at adult digital literacy acquisition. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 8, 624–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Klein, H. K., & Kleinman, D. L. (2002). The social construction of technology: Structural considerations. Science, Technology and Human Values, 27(1), 28–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Klopfer, E., Osterweil, S., Groff, J., & Haas, J. (2009). Using the technology of today in the classroom today. The instructional power of digital games, social networking, simulations, and how teachers can leverage them. http://eduction.mit.edu/papers/GamesSimsSocNets_EdArcade.pdf. Accessed 12 July 2011.
  24. Levine, A., & Dean, D. R. (2013). It’s only technology if it happens after you are born. The Journal of College Admission, 220, 6–12.Google Scholar
  25. Morgan, G. (2003). Faculty use of course management systems 2. https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ers0302/rs/ers0302w.pdf. Accessed June 2013.
  26. Nelson, L. J., Badger, S., & Wu, B. (2004). The influence of culture in emerging adulthood: Perspectives of Chinese college students. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(1), 26–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nelson, L. J., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Carroll, J. S., Barry, C. M., Madsen, S. D., & Badger, S. (2007). “If you want me to treat you like an adult, start acting like one!” Comparing the criteria that emerging adults and their parents have for adulthood. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 665–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Owston, R. (2006). Contextual factors that sustain innovative pedagogical practice using technology: An international study. Journal of Educational Change, 8, 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pitler, H., Hubbell, E. R., & Kuhn, M. (2007). Using technology with classroom instruction that works. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  30. Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
  31. Renes, S. L., & Strange, A. T. (2011). Using technology to enhance higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 36(3), 203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosen, L. D. (2011). Teaching the iGeneration. Educational Leadership, 68, 10–15.Google Scholar
  33. Settersten, R. A., Furstenberg, F. F., & Rumbaut, R. G. (Eds.). (2005). On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Sherer, P., & Shea, T. (2011). Using online video to support student learning and engagement. College Teaching, 59(2), 56–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Subrahmanyam, K., Reich, S. M., Waechter, N., & Espinoza, G. (2008). Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 420–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the Net Generation. Cambridge, MA: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  37. US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Digest of education statistic, 2011, Chapter 3, Table 220.Google Scholar
  38. US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). Digest of education statistics, 2012 (NCES 2014-015), fast facts. http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=98. Accessed 29 Jan 2015.
  39. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Weller, M. (2007). Virtual learning environments: Using, choosing and developing your VLE. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Skidmore CollegeSaratoga SpringsUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options