Cortical Activations During a Computer-Based Fraction Learning Game: Preliminary Results from a Pilot Study
Advances in educational neuroscience have made it possible for researchers to conduct studies that observe concurrent behavioral (i.e., task performance) and neural (i.e., brain activation) responses to naturalistic educational activities. Such studies are important because they help educators, clinicians, and researchers to better understand the etiology of both typical and atypical math processing. Because of its ease of use and robust tolerance of movement, functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) provides a brain-imaging platform that is optimally suited for such studies. To that end, the focus of the current research is to use fNIRS to help better understand the neural signatures associated with real-world math learning activities. For example, the computer game “Refraction” was designed as a fun and engaging method to improve fraction knowledge in children. Data collected in previous studies have identified significant correlations between Refraction play and improvements in fraction knowledge. Here we provide the results of a pilot study that describes participants’ cortical activations in response to Refraction play. As hypothesized, Refraction play resulted in increases in parietal cortical activations at levels above those measured during spatial-specific activities. Moreover, our results were similar to another fNIRS study by Dresler et al. (J Neural Transm 116(12): 1689–1700, 2009), where children read Arabic numeral addition equations compared to written equations. Our results provide a valuable proof-of-concept for the use of Refraction within a large-scale fNIRS-based longitudinal study of fraction learning.
KeywordsNeuroscience Neuroimaging NIRS Education Mathematics Educational neuroscience
- Baker, S., Petrick-Smith, C., Martin, T., Aghababyan, A., Popovic, Z., Andersen, E., et al. (2013). Learning fractions through splitting in an online game. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
- Bodner, M., & Shaw, G. L. (2004). Symmetry math video game used to train profound spatial-temporal reasoning abilities equivalent to dynamical knot theory. In R. T. Sharp & P. Winternitz (Eds.), Symmetry in physics: In memory of Robert T. Sharp (Vol. 34, pp. 189–201). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
- Center for Game Science (2013). Refraction [Softward}. Available from http://centerforgamescience.org/.
- Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Dresler, T., Obersteiner, A., Schecklmann, M., Vogel, A. C. M., Ehlis, A. C., Richter, M. M., et al. (2009). Arithmetic tasks in different formats and their influence on behavior and brain oxygenation as assessed with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS): A study involving primary and secondary school children. Jouranl of Neural Transmittion, 116(12), 1689–1700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Emerson, R. W., & Cantlon, J. F. (2014). Continuity and change in children’s longitudinal neural responses to numbers. Developmental Science, 18(2), 1–13.Google Scholar
- Hu, W., Bodner, M., Jones, E. G., Peterson, M. R., & Shaw, G. L. (2004). Data mining of mathematical reasoning data relevant to large innate spatial-temporal reasoning abilities in children: Implications for data driven education. In Society for neuroscience Abst 34th annual meeting.Google Scholar
- Jordan, K. E., & Baker, J. M. (2011). Multisensory information boosts numerical matching abilities in young children. Developmental Science, 14(2), 205–213.Google Scholar
- Martin, T., Petrick-Smith, C., Forsgren, N.F., Aghababyan, A., Janisiewicz, P., & Baker, S. (2014). Learning fractions by Splitting: Using learning analytics to illustrate the development of mathematical understanding. (Mansucript submitted for publication).Google Scholar
- Martin, T., Smith, C. P., Andersen, E., Liu, Y. E., & Popovic, Z. (2012). Refraction time: Making split decisions in an online fraction game. In American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, AERA.Google Scholar
- Moyer-Packenham, P., Baker, J. M., Westenskow, A., Anderson, K., Shumway, J. F., & Jordan, K. E. (2014). Predictors of achievement when virtual manipulatives are used for mathematics instruction. REDIMAT- Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 3(2), 121–150.Google Scholar
- Moyer-Packenham, P., Baker, J. M., Westenskow, A., Rodzon, K., Anderson, K., Shumway, J., & Jordan, K. (2013). A study comparing virtual manipulations with other instructional treatments in third- and fourth-grade classrooms. Journal of Education, 193(2), 25–39.Google Scholar
- Plichta, M. M., Herrmann, M. J., Baehne, C. G., Ehlis, A.-C., Richter, M. M., Pauli, P., & Fallgatter A. J. (2006). Event-related functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS): Are the measurements reliable? NeuroImage, 31, 116–124.Google Scholar