Advertisement

Technology, Knowledge and Learning

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 269–273 | Cite as

Review of: Hodgson et al. (2014) The Design, Experience and Practice of Networked

  • Peter Goodyear
Article

Author(s) and Contents of the Book

This book draws together a selection of outstanding papers from the 8th biennial Networked Learning Conference, held in 2012 in Maastricht, The Netherlands. The editors—Vivien Hodgson, Maarten de Laat, David McConnell, and Thomas Ryberg—are well known, within Europe and more widely, as leading figures in the field of research and development that has emerged in the last 15 years or so under the name ‘networked learning’. Indeed, Hodgson and McConnell are among the originators of this field, which focuses on researching situations in which people learn in collaboration with others, with much or all of their interaction being mediated through network technologies (Steeples and Jones 2002; Goodyear 2014).

Conference proceedings can be of uneven quality and sometimes offer an unsatisfactory sampling of contemporary work. This is not the case here. The editors have been able to select from among strong papers, which authors have revised in light of...

References

  1. Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (Eds.). (2012). Exploring the theory, pedagogy and practice of networked learning. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., Jones, C., & Lindström, B. (Eds.). (2009). Analysing networked learning practices in higher education and continuing professional development. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Faulkner, P., & Runde, J. (2011). The social, the material, and the ontology of non-material technological objects. Paper presented at the 27th EGOS (European Group for Organizational Studies) Colloquium, Gothenburg. http://webfirstlive.lse.ac.uk/management/documents/Non-MaterialTechnologicalObjects.pdf
  7. Fox, S. (2002). Studying networked learning: Some implications from socially situated learning theory and actor-network theory. In C. Steeples & C. Jones (Eds.), Networked learning: Perspectives and issues (pp. 77–92). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gleerup, J., Heilesen, S., Helms, N. H., & Mogensen, K. (2014). Designing for learning in coupled contexts. In V. Hodgson, M. de Laat, D. McConnell, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), The design, experience and practice of networked learning (pp. 51–66). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goodyear, P. (2014). Productive learning networks: The evolution of research and practice. In L. Carvalho & P. Goodyear (Eds.), The architecture of productive learning networks. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Goodyear, P., Banks, S., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (Eds.). (2004). Advances in research on networked learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  11. Goodyear, P., & Carvalho, L. (2014). Framing the analysis of learning network architectures. In L. Carvalho & P. Goodyear (Eds.), The architecture of productive learning networks. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Hodder, I. (2012). Entangled: an archaeology of the relationships between humans and things. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hutchins, E. (2010). Cognitive ecology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 705–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ingold, T. (2007). Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues, 14(01), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Kirsh, D. (2013). Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20(1), 1–30. doi: 10.1145/2442106.2442109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lonchamp, J. (2012). An instrumental perspective on CSCL systems. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(2), 211–237. doi: 10.1007/s11412-012-9141-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Malafouris, L. (2013). How things shape the mind: A theory of material engagement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Malafouris, L., & Renfrew, C. (Eds.). (2010). The cognitive life of things: Recasting the boundaries of the mind. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  21. Mason, R., & Kaye, A. (Eds.). (1989). Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  22. McConnell, D. (1994). Implementing computer supported cooperative learning. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  23. Periton, H., & Reynolds, M. (2014). ‘Here Be Dragons’: Approaching difficult group issues in networked learning. In V. Hodgson, M. de Laat, D. McConnell, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), The design, experience and practice of networked learning (pp. 109–129). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rabardel, P., & Bourmaud, G. (2003). From computer to instrument system: A developmental perspective. Interacting with Computers, 15(5), 665–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ritella, G., & Hakkarainen, K. (2012). Instrumental genesis in technology-mediated learning: From double stimulation to expansive knowledge practices. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(2), 239–258. doi: 10.1007/s11412-012-9144-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. London: Kogan Page.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Steeples, C., & Jones, C. (Eds.). (2002). Networked learning: Perspectives and issues. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Sterelny, K. (2012). The evolved apprentice: How evolution made humans unique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wright, S., & Parchoma, G. (2014). Mobile learning and immutable mobiles: Using iPhones to support informal learning in craft brewing. In V. Hodgson, M. de Laat, D. McConnell, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), The design, experience and practice of networked learning (pp. 241–261). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CoCo, Faculty of Education and Social WorkUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations