Advertisement

Technology, Knowledge and Learning

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 121–147 | Cite as

Making Sense of Stochastic Variation and Causality in a Virtual Environment

  • Theodosia Prodromou
  • Dave Pratt
Article
First Online:

Abstract

This paper presents a case study of students (age 14–15) as they attempt to make sense of distribution, adopting a range of causal meanings for the variation observed in the animated computer display and in the graphs generated by a BasketBall simulation. The student activity is analysed through dimensions of complex causality. The results indicate support for our conjecture that the computer simulation can offer new ways for harnessing causality to facilitate students’ meaning making for variation in distributions of data. In order to bridge the deterministic and the stochastic, the students transfer agency to active representations of distributional parameters, such as average and spread. This study finds that, whereas the stochastic is often seen as a distinct domain of knowledge, some students are able to exploit deterministic meanings to account for variation in terms of probabilistic causality.

Keywords

Distribution Causality Randomness Probability Variation Microworld design Probabilistic causality 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Association for Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlson, R. A. (2002). Conscious intentions in the control of skilled mental activity. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 41, pp. 191–228). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. deCharms, R. (1987). The burden of motivation. In M. L. Maehr & D. A. Kleiber (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Enhancing motivation (Vol. 5, pp. 1–21). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  6. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Perspectives on motivation (Vol. 38, pp. 237–288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska press.Google Scholar
  7. Fischbein, E. (1975). The intuitive sources of probabilistic thinking in children. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gould, R. (2004). Variability: One statistician’s view. Statistics Education Research Journal, 3(2), 7–16.Google Scholar
  10. Grotzer, A. T., & Perkins, N. D. (2000). A taxonomy of causal models: The conceptual leaps between models and students’ reflections on them. National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST), New Orleans.Google Scholar
  11. Kapadia, R., & Borovcnik, M. (Eds.). (1991). Chance encounters: Probability in education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Mason, J. (1994). Researching from the inside in mathematics education—locating an I—you relationship. In J. P. da Ponte & J. F. Matos (Eds.), Proceedings of the eighteenth international conference for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 1) (pp. 176–194). Portugal: University of Lisbon.Google Scholar
  13. Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1996). Windows on mathematical meanings: Learning cultures and computers. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Papert, S. (1996). An exploration in the space of mathematics educations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1(1), 95–123.Google Scholar
  15. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1975). The Origin of the Idea of Chance in Children (L. J. Leake & P. D. Burell & H. D. Fischbein, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published in 1951).Google Scholar
  16. Pratt, D. (1998a). The construction of meanings in and for a stochastic domain of abstraction. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of London, London.Google Scholar
  17. Pratt, D. (1998b). The co-ordination of meanings for randomness. For the Learning of Mathematics, 18(3), 2–11.Google Scholar
  18. Pratt, D. (2000). Making sense of the total of two dice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(5), 602–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Prodromou, T. (2008). Connecting thinking about distribution. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Warwick, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  20. Prodromou, T. (2012). Students’ construction of meanings about the co-ordination of the two epistemological perspectives on distribution. International Journal of Statistics and Probability, 1(2), 283–300. doi: 10.5539/ijsp.v1n2p283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Prodromou, T., & Pratt, D. (2006). The role of causality in the co-ordination of the two perspectives on distribution within a virtual simulation. Statistics Education Research Journal, 5(2), 69–88.Google Scholar
  22. Robson, C. (1993). Real world research. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wilensky, U. (1991). Abstract meditations on the concrete and concrete implications for mathematics education. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 193–204). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia
  2. 2.Institute of EducationUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options