Teachers’ Initial Orchestration of Students’ Dynamic Geometry Software Use: Consequences for Students’ Opportunities to Learn Mathematics
- First Online:
This paper reports from a case study with teachers at two schools in Norway participating in developmental projects aiming for inquiry communities in mathematics teaching and learning. In the reported case study, the teachers participated in one of the developmental projects focusing on implementation and use of computer software in mathematics teaching. I study teachers’ initial orchestration of dynamic geometry software (DGS) in mathematics teaching at lower secondary school. By utilising the notion of ‘instrumental orchestration’ from the theoretical perspective known as the ‘instrumental approach’ (Drijvers et al., in Educ Stud Math 75:213–234, 2010; Trouche, in Int J Comput Math Learn 9:281–307, 2004), I examine how teachers in their initial teaching with DGS empower students’ mathematics learning with the DGS software. According to this perspective, it involves teachers’ orchestration of two interrelated processes instrumentation and instrumentalisation. Analytical findings indicate that a difference in teachers’ empowerment is evident and consequences for students’ opportunities to engage with mathematics represented by the DGS are presented.
KeywordsDynamic geometry software Instrumental orchestration Instrumentalisation Instrumentation New tool for teachers
- Artigue, M. (2007). Digital technologies: A window on theoretical issues in mathematics education. In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Philippou (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth conference of the European society for research in mathematics education (pp. 68–82). Larnaca, Cyprus: University of Cyprus.Google Scholar
- Berry, J. S., Graham, T., Honey, S., & Headlam, C. (2007). A case study of the issues arising when teachers adopt the use of a new form of technology in their teaching for the first time. The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 14, 150–160.Google Scholar
- Bretscher, N. (2010). Dynamic geometry software: The teacher’s role in facilitating instrumental genesis. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth conference of the European society for research in mathematics education (pp. 1340–1348). Lyon: INRP.Google Scholar
- Bueie, H. (n.d.). Innføring i Cabri. In http://www.matematikk.org/ . Retrieved April 13, 2011, from http://www.matematikk.org/_voksne/uopplegg/vis.html?tid=66132#
- Dörfler, W. (1993). Computer use and views of the mind. In C. Keitel & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Learning from computers: Mathematics education and technology (pp. 159–186). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Erfjord, I. (2008). Teachers’ implementation and orchestration of Cabri-use in mathematics teaching. Doctoral thesis in mathematics didactics, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.Google Scholar
- Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Goos, M., & Soury-Lavergne, S. (2009). Teachers and teaching: theoretical perspectives and issues concerning classroom implementation. In C. Hoyles & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology—rethinking the Terrain. The 17th ICMI study (pp. 311–328). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hagness, R., & Veiteberg, J. (1999). The Curriculum for the 10-year compulsory school in Norway. Oslo, Norway: National Centre for Educational Resources.Google Scholar
- Hals, S. (2010). IKT i matematikkopplæringen–tidstjuv eller tryllemiddel? En studie av faktorer som kan påvirke bruken av IKT generelt og GeoGebra spesielt, hos lærere og elever på 10. og 11. årstrinn. Master thesis in mathematics didactics, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.Google Scholar
- Kasten, S. E., & Sinclair, N. (2009). Using dynamic geometry software in the mathematics classroom: A study of teachers’ choices and rationales. The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 16, 133–143.Google Scholar
- KD. (2006). Læreplanverket for Kunnskapsløftet (English version available and retrieved August 20, 2010 from http://www.udir.no/Tema/In-English/Curriculum-in-English/ ). Oslo, Norway: Utdanningsdirektoratet.
- Laborde, C., Kynigos, C., Hollebrands, K., & Strässer, R. (2006). Teaching and learning geometry with technology. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 275–304). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Long, J. B. (1987). Cognitive ergonomics and human-computer interaction. In P. Warr (Ed.), Psychology at work (Third ed. ed., pp. 73–95). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Monaghan, J. (2001). Teachers’ classroom interaction in ICT-based mathematics lessons. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th international conference for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 3-383–3-390). Utrecht: Freudenthal institute.Google Scholar
- Monaghan, J. (2007). Computer algebra, instrumentation and the anthropological approach. The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 14, 63–71.Google Scholar
- Rabardel, P. (2002). People and technology, a cognitive approach to contemporary instruments. Retrieved August 20, 2010 from http://ergoserv.psy.univ-paris8.fr/Site/default.asp?Act_group=1.
- Trouche, L. (2003). From artifact to instrument: Mathematics teaching mediated by symbolic calculators. Interacting with Computers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 783–800.Google Scholar
- Wagner, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A framework for reconsidering research-practitioner cooperation. Educational Researcher, 26, 13–22.Google Scholar