Advertisement

Innovative Higher Education

, Volume 44, Issue 6, pp 497–510 | Cite as

The Distribution of College Grades across Fields in the Contemporary University

  • Joseph C. HermanowiczEmail author
  • David W. Woodring
Article

Abstract

Scholars have argued that grade inflation is pervasive throughout colleges and universities and that it is presently at an all-time high. Inflation is, however, a temporal concept: it is theoretically impossible for grades to keep increasing on a fixed scale. In this article we examine a related, though empirically distinct, phenomenon: the distribution of grades across fields in a university. We question global statements about grade inflation and examine if and how the university grading structure is internally differentiated. We use the idea of consensus, the extent to which practitioners of a field agree, as a means to differentiate areas in a university. Based on undergraduate grade data from a large, public university in the U.S., we use cluster analysis to ascertain an “architecture” of grades. The results demonstrate significant variation in how grades are distributed across fields. The work identifies a need to probe further the linkages between field consensus, rigor, student learning, and grade allocation in college.

Keywords

College students Grades Grade inflation Academic fields Cluster analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Karlo Lei and Sondra Barringer for comments and suggestions in the development of the paper.

References

  1. American Association of University Professors (2015). Policy documents and reports (11th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arum, R., Roksa, J., Cruz, J., & Silver, B. (2018). Student experiences in college. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of education in the 21st century (pp. 385–403). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Babcock, P. S., & Marks, M. (2011). The falling time cost of college: Evidence from half a century of time use data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 468–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Milton Keynes, United Kingdom: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, H.S., Geer, B., & Hughes, E.C. (1968). Making the grade: The academic side of college life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  7. Braxton, J. M., & Hargens, L. L. (1996). Variation among academic disciplines: Analytical frameworks and research. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 11, pp. 1–46). New York, NY: Agathon.Google Scholar
  8. Brint, S., & Cantwell, A. M. (2010). Undergraduate time use and academic outcomes: Results from the University of California undergraduate experience survey, 2006. Teachers College Record, 112, 2441–2470.Google Scholar
  9. Charles, C. Z., Fischer, M. J., Mooney, M. A., & Massey, D. S. (2009). Taming the river: Negotiating the academic, financial, and social currents in selective colleges and universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cole, S. (1993). Making science: Between nature and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. DeMarzo, P. M., Fishman, M. J., & Hagerty, K. M. (2005). Self-regulation and government oversight. Review of Economic Studies, 72, 687–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frey, B. S. (2006). Giving and receiving awards. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garson, G. D. (2014). Cluster analysis. Ashboro, NC: Statistical Associates.Google Scholar
  14. Goldman, L. (1985). The betrayal of the gatekeepers. The Journal of General Education, 37, 97–121.Google Scholar
  15. Grigsby, M. (2009). College life through the eyes of students. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hagstrom, W. O. (1965). The scientific community. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Hahs-Vaughn, D. (2016). Applied multivariate statistical concepts. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hargens, L. L. (1975). Patterns of scientific research: A comparative analysis of research in three scientific fields. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  19. Hargens, L. L., & Kelly-Wilson, L. (1994). Determinants of disciplinary discontent. Social Forces, 72, 1177–1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hermanowicz, J. C. (1998). The stars are not enough: Scientists—their passions and professions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hermanowicz, J. C. (2009). In Lives in science: How institutions affect academic careers. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hu, S. (2005). Beyond grade inflation: Grading problems in higher education. ASHE Higher Education Report, 30. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  23. Huberty, C.J., Jordan, E.M., & Brandt, W.C. (2005). Cluster analysis in higher education research. In J.C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, Vol. 20 (pp. 437–457). Dordrecht: The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Hunt, L.H. (Ed.). (2008). Grade inflation: Academic standards in higher education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, V. E. (2003). Grade inflation: A crisis in college education. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Krautmann, A. C., & Sander, W. (1999). Grades and student evaluations of teachers. Economics of Education Review, 18, 59–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Merton, R. K., & Zuckerman, H. ([1972] 1973). Age, aging, and age structure in science.” In N. W. Storer (Ed.), The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 497–559). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Milton, O., Pollio, H. R., & Eison, J. A. (1986). Making sense of college grades. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Mooi, E., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). A concise guide to market research. Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Mostrom, A. M., & Blumberg, P. (2012). Does learning-centered teaching promote grade improvement? Innovative Higher Education, 37, 397–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students, volume 2. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  32. Rojstaczer, S. (2016). GradeInflation.com: Grade inflation at American colleges and universities. Retrieved from http://www.gradeinflation.com/
  33. Rojstaczer, S., & Healy, C. (2010). Grading in American colleges and universities. Teachers College Record. http://gradeinflation.com.tcr2010grading.pdf
  34. Rojstaczer, S., & Healy, C. (2012). Where a is ordinary: The evolution of American college and university grading, 1940-2009. Teachers College Record, 114, 1–23.Google Scholar
  35. Rosovsky, H., & Hartley, M. (2002). Evaluation and the academy: Are we doing the right thing?: Grade inflation and letters of recommendation. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts & Sciences.Google Scholar
  36. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyThe University of GeorgiaAthensUnited States

Personalised recommendations