Innovative Higher Education

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 53–67 | Cite as

Going to College without Going to Campus: A Case Study of Online Student Recruitment

  • Justin C. OrtagusEmail author
  • Melvin J. Tanner


Despite the financial benefits generally associated with expanding student enrollment through online education, many institutions may not know how to recruit online students. This case study drew upon interviews with 27 administrators from four public research universities in order to better understand how to recruit students for exclusively online degree programs. Findings revealed that administrators identify the characteristics and needs of prospective online students, outline which non-academic services can be outsourced to alleviate cost burdens, identify ways to leverage the institutional brand as indistinguishable from the individual online program, and prioritize personalized student interactions throughout the online student recruitment process.


Online education Student recruitment Exclusively online degree programs Higher education administration 


  1. Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States. The Sloan Consortium. Babson Park, MA: Babson Research Group.Google Scholar
  2. Bakeman, J. (2014, January 14), SUNY wants to add 100,000 students—All online. Politico. Retrieved from
  3. Bates, A. W. (2000). Managing technological change: Strategies for college and university leaders. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Bowen, W. (2013). Higher education in the digital age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., Lack, K. A., & Nygren, T. I. (2014). Interactive learning online at public universities: Evidence from a six-campus randomized trial. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33, 94–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burnette, D. M. (2015). Negotiating the mine field: Strategies for effective online education administrative leadership in higher education institutions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 16(3), 13–25.Google Scholar
  7. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  8. Cheslock, J., & Gianneschi, M. (2008). Replacing state appropriations with alternative revenue sources: The case of voluntary support. Journal of Higher Education, 79, 208–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheslock, J., Ortagus, J., Umbricht, M., & Wymore, J. (2016). The cost of producing higher education: An exploration of theory, evidence, and institutional policy. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher Education : Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. 31 (pp.349–392). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, B. R. (2004). Delineating the character of the entrepreneurial university. Higher Education Policy, 17, 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  12. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  13. Deming, D. J., Goldin, C., Katz, L. F., & Yuchtman, N. (2015). Can online learning bend the higher education cost curve? The American Economic Review, 105, 496–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DesJardins, S. L., Dundar, H., & Hendel, D. D. (1999). Modeling the college application decision process in a land-grant university. Economics of Education Review, 18(1), 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elliott, K. M., & Healy, M. A. (2001). Key factors influencing student satisfaction related to recruitment and retention. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 10(4), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geith, C., & Vignare, K. (2008). Access to education with online learning and open educational resources: Can they close the gap? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(1), 105–126.Google Scholar
  17. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
  18. Jaggars, S. (2012). Online learning in community colleges. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 594–608). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Jaquette, O., & Curs, B. (2015). Creating the out-of-state university: Do public universities increase nonresident freshman enrollment in response to declining state appropriations? Research in Higher Education, 56, 535–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. LeBlanc, P. (2013). Disruptive technologies and higher education: Toward the next generation of delivery models. In A. P. Kelly & K. Carey (Eds.), Stretching the higher education dollar: How innovation can improve access, equity, and affordability (pp. 163–182). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  21. Lindsay, R., & Sessoms, E. (2006). Assessment of campus recreation program on student recruitment, retention, and frequency of participation across certain demographic variables. Recreational Sports Journal, 30(1), 30–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mars, M. M., & Metcalfe, A. S. (2009). The entrepreneurial domains of US higher education ( ASHE higher education report, Vol. 34, No. 5). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  23. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  24. McClure, K. R. (2016). Building the innovative and entrepreneurial university: An institutional case study of administrative academic capitalism. The Journal of Higher Education, 87, 516–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  26. Meyer, K. A. (2006). Cost-efficiencies of online learning (ASHE higher education report, Vol. 32, no. 1). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  27. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  28. Miller, B. (2010). The course of innovation: Using technology to transform higher education. Washington DC: Education Sector.Google Scholar
  29. Morris, D. (2008). Economies of scale and scope in e-learning. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 331–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ortagus, J. C. (2017). From the periphery to prominence: An examination of the changing profile of online students in American higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ortagus, J. C. (2018). National evidence of the impact of first-year online enrollment on postsecondary students’ long-term academic outcomes. Research in Higher Education.
  33. Ortagus, J. C., & Yang, L. (2017). An examination of the influence of decreases in state appropriations on online enrollment at public universities. Research in Higher Education., 59, 847–865. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2003). The virtual student: A profile and guide to working with online learners. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  35. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  36. Paulsen, M. B. (1990) College choice: Understanding student enrollment behavior (ASHE-ERIC higher education report, No. 6.) Washington, DC: The George Washington University.Google Scholar
  37. Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). What's the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.Google Scholar
  38. Renn, K. A. (2017). The role of women's colleges and universities in providing access to postsecondary education. The Review of Higher Education, 41, 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reynolds, G. L. (2007). The impact of facilities on recruitment and retention of students. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2007(135), 63–80.Google Scholar
  40. Rovai, A. P., & Downey, J. R. (2010). Why some distance education programs fail while others succeed in a global environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  42. Sandelowski, M. (1995). Focus on qualitative methods: Sample sizes in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 18, 179–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Seaman, J.E., Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group.Google Scholar
  44. Sener, J. (2012). The seven futures of American Education: Improving learning and teaching in a screen-captured world. North Charleston, SC: CreateSpace.Google Scholar
  45. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Walker, J. (2014). Exploring the academic capitalist time regime. In B. Cantwell & I. Kauppinen (Eds.), Academic capitalism in the age of globalization (pp. 55–73). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Wiles, R. (2017, February 6). University of Phoenix parent Apollo education starts new chapter as private firm. Arizona Republic. Retrieved from
  48. Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Performance gaps between online and face-to-face courses: Differences across types of students and academic subject areas. The Journal of Higher Education, 85, 633–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  50. Yin, R. K. (2003). Applications of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  51. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Higher Education Administration and PolicyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations