Innovative Higher Education

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 273–285

Beyond Teaching and Research: Faculty Perceptions of Service Roles at Research Universities

  • Ketevan Mamiseishvili
  • Michael T. Miller
  • Donghun Lee
Article

Abstract

Faculty members in higher education institutions frequently have the responsibility of providing service activities to their institutions, professional societies, and external communities. This responsibility, however, generally carries little reward in the workplace and does not play a major role in promotion criteria. For the study we report here we drew upon a sample of 4,400 research university faculty members to explore their satisfaction with service roles by academic rank. Findings showed that mid-career faculty members at the associate professor rank were significantly less satisfied with their service functions, including workload, equity, work balance, recognition, and institutional support, when compared with both assistant and full professors.

Keywords

Faculty satisfaction Service Research universities 

References

  1. Baldwin, R. G., & Change, D. A. (2006, Fall). Reinforcing our “keystone” faculty: Strategies to support faculty in the middle years of academic life. Liberal Education, 92(4), 28-35.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin, R. G., Lunceford, C. J., & Vanderlinden, K. E. (2005). Faculty in the middle years: Illuminating an overlooked phase of academic life. The Review of Higher Education, 29, 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benson, R. T., Mathews, K. R., & Trower, C. A. (2014). The Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education: Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey, 2014 (Research version) [data file and codebook]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  4. Blackburn, R. T., & Lawrence, J. H. (1995). Faculty at work: Motivation, expectation, satisfaction. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bornheimer, D. G., Burns, G. P., & Dumke, G. S. (1973). The faculty in higher education. Danville, IL: Interstate Printers and Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, C., & O’Meara, K. A. (2014). Faculty agency: Departmental contexts that matter in faculty careers. Research in Higher Education, 55, 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. COACHE: The Collaborative of Academic Careers in Higher Education, Harvard Graduate School of Education (n. d.). Retrieved from www.coache.org.
  8. COACHE: The Collaborative of Academic Careers in Higher Education, Harvard Graduate School of Education. (2014). Benchmark best practices: Nature of work: Service. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.Google Scholar
  9. Evans, J. P. (1999). Benefits and barriers to shared authority. In M. T. Miller (Ed.), Responsive academic decision making, Involving faculty in higher education governance (pp. 29–54). Stillwater, OK: New Forums.Google Scholar
  10. Finkelstein, M. J., Seal, R. K., & Schuster, J. H. (1998). The new academic generation: A profession in transition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fitzmaurice, M. (2013). Constructing professional identity as a new academic: A moral endeavor. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 613–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hagedorn, L. S. (2000). Conceptualizing faculty satisfaction: Components, theories, and outcomes. New Directions for Institutional Research, 105, 5-20. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Jaeger, A. J., & Thornton, C. H. (2006). Neither honor nor compensation: Faculty and public service. Educational Policy, 20, 345–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson, V. E. (2013). Revised standards for statistical evidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 19313–19317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Knefelkamp, L. L. (1990). Seasons of academic life. Liberal Education, 76(3), 4–12.Google Scholar
  16. Lawrence, J., Ott, M., & Bell, A. (2012). Faculty organizational commitment and citizenship. Research in Higher Education, 53, 325–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lucas, C. J., & Murry, J. W., Jr. (2011). New faculty: A practical guide for academic beginners. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maehr, M. L., & Braskamp, L. A. (1986). The motivation factor: A theory of personal investment. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  19. Mamiseishvili, K., & Rosser, V. J. (2011). Examining the relationship between faculty productivity and job satisfaction. Journal of the Professoriate, 5(2), 100–132.Google Scholar
  20. Miller, M. T., McCormack, T. F., & Newman, R. E. (1995). Teaching faculty perceptions of involvement in the governance process. Baylor Educator, 20(2), 28–35.Google Scholar
  21. Neumann, A., & Terosky, A. (2007). To give and to receive: Recently tenured professors’ experiences of service major research universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 78, 282–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. O’Meara, K. A. (2002). Uncovering the values in faculty evaluation of service as scholarship. The Review of Higher Education, 26, 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. O’Meara, K. A., Terosky, A. L., & Neumann, A. (2008). Faculty careers and work lives: A professional growth perspective. ASHE Higher Education Report, 34(3), 1-221. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  24. Porter, S. R. (2007). A closer look at faculty service: What affects participation on committees? The Journal of Higher Education, 78, 523–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reybold, L. E., & Corda, K. W. (2011). Faculty identity and the “lesser role”: Service to the academy. Journal of the Professoriate, 5(1), 121–148.Google Scholar
  26. Rosser, V. J. (2004). Faculty members’ intentions to leave: A national study on their worklife and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 45, 285–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schmider, E., Ziegler, M., Danay, E., Beyer, L., & Buhner, M. (2010). Is it really robust? Reinvestigating the robustness of ANOVA against violations of the normal distribution assumption. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 6(4), 147–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schuster, J. H., & Finkelstein, M. J. (2006). The restructuring of academic work and careers: The American faculty. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Smart, J. C. (1990). A causal model of faculty turnover intentions. Research in Higher Education, 31, 405–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Strage, A., & Merdinger, J. (2014). Professional growth and renewal for mid-career faculty. Journal of Faculty Development, 28(3), 41–50.Google Scholar
  31. Terosky, O’Meara, K. A., & Campbell, C. M. (2014). Enabling possibility: Women associate professors’ sense of agency in career advancement. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 7, 58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Trower, C. A. (2011). Senior faculty satisfaction: Perceptions of associate and full professors at seven public research universities. TIAA-CREF Institute Research Dialogue, 101, 1–15.Google Scholar
  33. Ward, K. (2003). Faculty service roles and the scholarship of engagement. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey Bass and the Association for the Study of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  34. Wilson, R. (2012, June 3). Why associate professors are so unhappy? The Chronicle of Higher Education, 1-10. Retrieved rom http://chronicle.com/article/Why-Are-Associate-Professors/132071/

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ketevan Mamiseishvili
    • 1
  • Michael T. Miller
    • 2
  • Donghun Lee
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Rehabilitation, Human Resources, and Communication DisordersUniversity of ArkansasFayettevilleUSA
  2. 2.College of Education and Health ProfessionsUniversity of ArkansasFayettevilleUSA
  3. 3.Counselor Education and SupervisionUniversity of ArkansasFayettevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations