Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Exploring Business Models for MOOCs in Higher Education

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) potentially challenge the traditional dominance of brick and mortar institutions as providers of quality higher education. The benefits for students include reduced education costs and global access to exclusive institution courses and instructors. However, the benefits for institutions are less clear as there is a financial overhead required to develop and deliver content that is suitable for mass student consumption. In this article we examine the opportunities that MOOCs provide and identify several different business model challenges for offering MOOCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    In North American usage, this term is to be understood as “graduate.”

References

  1. Asterhan, C. S. C. (2011). Assessing e-moderation behavior from synchronous discussion protocols with a multi-dimensional methodology. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 449–458.

  2. Attis, D., Koproske, C., & Miller, C. (2012). Understanding the MOOC trend: The adoption and impact of massive open online courses. Washington, DC: The Education Advisory Board. Retrieved from http://www.eab.com

  3. Belanger, Y., & Thornton, J. (2013). Bioelectricity: A quantitative approach. Duke University’s first MOOC. Durham, NC: Duke University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10161/6216

  4. Blatter, M., Muehlemann, S., & Schenker, S. (2012). The costs of hiring skilled workers. European Economic Review, 56, 20–35.

  5. Bruff, D. (2013, February 19). Online learning ecosystems: What to make of MOOC dropout rates? [Blog message]. Retrieved from http://derekbruff.org

  6. Carey, K. (2013, February 13). Obama, Rubio agree on one thing: Technology could fix the Higher Ed mess. Slate. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com

  7. Colman, D. (2013, April 2). The big problem for MOOCs visualized. Open Culture. Retrieved from http://www.openculture.com

  8. Davidson, C. (2013, November 6). Clearing up some myths about MOOCs [Blog message]. Retrieved from Humanities, Arts, Science and Technology Alliance and Collaboratory (HASTAC) website http://www.hastac.org

  9. EDUCAUSE (2012, December 20). What campus leaders need to know about MOOCs: an EDUCAUSE executive briefing. Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE Publications. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu

  10. Edwards, C. (2012, August). MOOC’s: An analysis for BCIT. British Columbia, Canada: British Columbia Institute of Technology. Retrieved from http://landing.athabascau.ca

  11. EvoLLLution NewsWire (2013). Finally, a business model for MOOCs. EvoLLLution. Retrieved from http://www.evolllution.com

  12. Firmin, R., Schiorring, E., Whitmer, J., Willett, T., & Sujitparapitaya, S. (2013, September). Preliminary Summary: SJSU + Augmented Online Learning Environment: Pilot Project. San Jose, CA: Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges. Retrieved from http://www.sjsu.edu

  13. Gallagher, S., & Garrett, G. (2013, July 31). Disruptive education: Technology Enabled Universities. Sydney, Australia: United States Studies Centre, University of Sydney. Retrieved from http://ussc.edu.au

  14. Haggard, S. (2013). The maturing of the MOOC (BIS Research paper number 130). London, England: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. Retrieved from http://www.gov.uk

  15. Higher Education Price Index (2013). Retrieved from the Commonfund Institute website: http://www.commonfund.org

  16. Hyman, P. (2013, October 22). MOOCs evolve; Version 2.0 aims to retain more students. Communications of the ACM. Retrieved from http://cacm.acm.org

  17. Jordan, K. (n.d.). MOOC Completion Rates: The Data [Table]. Retrieved from http://www.katyjordan.com

  18. Kedem, K., & Puchalla, J. E. (2012). Shifting ground: Technology begins to alter centuries-old business model for universities. (Report Number 144483), New York, NY: Moody’s Investors Service. Retrieved from http://www.moodys.com

  19. Kolowich, S. (2012a, June 11). How will MOOCs make money? Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com

  20. Kolowich, S. (2012b, September 12). The MOOC Survivors. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/

  21. Kolowich, S., (2013a, February 21). How EdX plans to earn, and share, revenue from its free online courses. The Chronicle of Higher Education, Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com

  22. Kolowich, S., (2013b, March 24). The Professors Who Make the MOOCs. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com

  23. Leckart, S., (2012, March 20). The Stanford education experiment could change higher learning forever. Wired. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com

  24. Lewin, T., (2013, January 6). Students rush to web classes, but profits may be much later. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com

  25. Loukis, E., Pazalos, K., & Salagara, A. (2012). Transforming e-services evaluation data into business analytics using value models. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11, 129–141.

  26. Morris, L. V. (2013). MOOCs, emerging technologies, and quality. Innovative Higher Education, 38, 251–252.

  27. Rivard, R., (2013a, March 22). Coursera’s contractual elitism. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com

  28. Rivard, R. (2013b, July 18). Udacity project on “pause”. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com

  29. Sandeen, C. (2013, July 18). From hype to nuanced promise: American higher education and the MOOC 3.0 era. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com

  30. Sitzmann, T. (2012). A theoretical model and analysis of the effect of self-regulation on attrition from voluntary online training. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 46–54.

  31. Young, J. R. (2012a, July 19). Inside the Coursera contract: How an upstart company might profit from free courses. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com

  32. Young, J. R., (2012b, July 19). The U. of Michigan's contract with Coursera. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com

  33. Young, J. R. (2013, February 21). Revenue-sharing models between edX and university partners. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com

  34. Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education (2013:WP01). Bolton, UK: JISC Centre for Educational Technology & Interoperability Standards. Retrieved from http://www.cetis.ac.uk

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Shamus P. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burd, E.L., Smith, S.P. & Reisman, S. Exploring Business Models for MOOCs in Higher Education. Innov High Educ 40, 37–49 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-014-9297-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Massive open online course
  • Open education
  • Business model
  • MOOC