Advertisement

Innovative Higher Education

, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp 37–49 | Cite as

Exploring Business Models for MOOCs in Higher Education

  • Elizabeth L. Burd
  • Shamus P. Smith
  • Sorel Reisman
Article

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) potentially challenge the traditional dominance of brick and mortar institutions as providers of quality higher education. The benefits for students include reduced education costs and global access to exclusive institution courses and instructors. However, the benefits for institutions are less clear as there is a financial overhead required to develop and deliver content that is suitable for mass student consumption. In this article we examine the opportunities that MOOCs provide and identify several different business model challenges for offering MOOCs.

Keywords

Massive open online course Open education Business model MOOC 

References

  1. Asterhan, C. S. C. (2011). Assessing e-moderation behavior from synchronous discussion protocols with a multi-dimensional methodology. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 449–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Attis, D., Koproske, C., & Miller, C. (2012). Understanding the MOOC trend: The adoption and impact of massive open online courses. Washington, DC: The Education Advisory Board. Retrieved from http://www.eab.com
  3. Belanger, Y., & Thornton, J. (2013). Bioelectricity: A quantitative approach. Duke University’s first MOOC. Durham, NC: Duke University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10161/6216
  4. Blatter, M., Muehlemann, S., & Schenker, S. (2012). The costs of hiring skilled workers. European Economic Review, 56, 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruff, D. (2013, February 19). Online learning ecosystems: What to make of MOOC dropout rates? [Blog message]. Retrieved from http://derekbruff.org
  6. Carey, K. (2013, February 13). Obama, Rubio agree on one thing: Technology could fix the Higher Ed mess. Slate. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com
  7. Colman, D. (2013, April 2). The big problem for MOOCs visualized. Open Culture. Retrieved from http://www.openculture.com
  8. Davidson, C. (2013, November 6). Clearing up some myths about MOOCs [Blog message]. Retrieved from Humanities, Arts, Science and Technology Alliance and Collaboratory (HASTAC) website http://www.hastac.org
  9. EDUCAUSE (2012, December 20). What campus leaders need to know about MOOCs: an EDUCAUSE executive briefing. Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE Publications. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu
  10. Edwards, C. (2012, August). MOOC’s: An analysis for BCIT. British Columbia, Canada: British Columbia Institute of Technology. Retrieved from http://landing.athabascau.ca
  11. EvoLLLution NewsWire (2013). Finally, a business model for MOOCs. EvoLLLution. Retrieved from http://www.evolllution.com
  12. Firmin, R., Schiorring, E., Whitmer, J., Willett, T., & Sujitparapitaya, S. (2013, September). Preliminary Summary: SJSU + Augmented Online Learning Environment: Pilot Project. San Jose, CA: Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges. Retrieved from http://www.sjsu.edu
  13. Gallagher, S., & Garrett, G. (2013, July 31). Disruptive education: Technology Enabled Universities. Sydney, Australia: United States Studies Centre, University of Sydney. Retrieved from http://ussc.edu.au
  14. Haggard, S. (2013). The maturing of the MOOC (BIS Research paper number 130). London, England: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. Retrieved from http://www.gov.uk
  15. Higher Education Price Index (2013). Retrieved from the Commonfund Institute website: http://www.commonfund.org
  16. Hyman, P. (2013, October 22). MOOCs evolve; Version 2.0 aims to retain more students. Communications of the ACM. Retrieved from http://cacm.acm.org
  17. Jordan, K. (n.d.). MOOC Completion Rates: The Data [Table]. Retrieved from http://www.katyjordan.com
  18. Kedem, K., & Puchalla, J. E. (2012). Shifting ground: Technology begins to alter centuries-old business model for universities. (Report Number 144483), New York, NY: Moody’s Investors Service. Retrieved from http://www.moodys.com
  19. Kolowich, S. (2012a, June 11). How will MOOCs make money? Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com
  20. Kolowich, S. (2012b, September 12). The MOOC Survivors. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/
  21. Kolowich, S., (2013a, February 21). How EdX plans to earn, and share, revenue from its free online courses. The Chronicle of Higher Education, Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com
  22. Kolowich, S., (2013b, March 24). The Professors Who Make the MOOCs. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com
  23. Leckart, S., (2012, March 20). The Stanford education experiment could change higher learning forever. Wired. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com
  24. Lewin, T., (2013, January 6). Students rush to web classes, but profits may be much later. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
  25. Loukis, E., Pazalos, K., & Salagara, A. (2012). Transforming e-services evaluation data into business analytics using value models. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11, 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Morris, L. V. (2013). MOOCs, emerging technologies, and quality. Innovative Higher Education, 38, 251–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rivard, R., (2013a, March 22). Coursera’s contractual elitism. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com
  28. Rivard, R. (2013b, July 18). Udacity project on “pause”. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com
  29. Sandeen, C. (2013, July 18). From hype to nuanced promise: American higher education and the MOOC 3.0 era. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com
  30. Sitzmann, T. (2012). A theoretical model and analysis of the effect of self-regulation on attrition from voluntary online training. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 46–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Young, J. R. (2012a, July 19). Inside the Coursera contract: How an upstart company might profit from free courses. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com
  32. Young, J. R., (2012b, July 19). The U. of Michigan's contract with Coursera. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com
  33. Young, J. R. (2013, February 21). Revenue-sharing models between edX and university partners. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com
  34. Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education (2013:WP01). Bolton, UK: JISC Centre for Educational Technology & Interoperability Standards. Retrieved from http://www.cetis.ac.uk

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth L. Burd
    • 1
  • Shamus P. Smith
    • 1
  • Sorel Reisman
    • 2
  1. 1.The University of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
  2. 2.California State UniversityFullertonUSA

Personalised recommendations