Innovative Higher Education

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 271–282 | Cite as

Using Blogs and New Media in Academic Practice: Potential Roles in Research, Teaching, Learning, and Extension

  • Douglas A. Powell
  • Casey J. Jacob
  • Benjamin J. Chapman
Article

Abstract

Compiling a referenced article for publication in a peer-reviewed journal is traditionally the most respected means of contributing to a body of knowledge. However, we argue that publication of evidence-based information via new media – especially blogging – can also be a valid form of academic scholarship. Blogs allow for rapid sharing of research methods, results, and conclusions in an open, transparent manner. With proper references, blogs and other new media can position academic research in the public sphere and provide rapid, reliable information in response to emerging issues. They can also support other traditional goals of higher education institutions, serving as tools for teaching, learning and outreach.

Key words

New media Social media Blogging Academic scholarship 

References

  1. Alterman, E. (2003). Determining the value of blogs. Nieman Reports, 57(3), 85–86. Retrieved from http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reports.aspx Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, K., Marateo, R., & Ferris, S. (2007). Teaching and learning with the net generation. Innovate, 3(4). Retrieved from http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=382
  3. Bärstad, C. (2011). Communicating Science – Motives and methods for the communication of science in the 21st century (Master’s thesis, Lund University). Retrieved from https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/
  4. Berube, D. M., Faber, B., Scheufele, D. A., Cummings, C. L., Gardner, G. E., Martin, K.M., et al. (2010). Communicating Risk in the 21st Century: The case of nanotechnology. Retrieved from http://www.nano.gov/sites/default/files/pub_resource/berube_risk_white_paper_feb_2010.pdf
  5. Betts, J. D., & Glogoff, S. J. (2005). Instructional models for using weblogs in e-learning: Case studies from a hybrid and virtual course. Retrieved from http://download.101com.com/syllabus/conf/summer2004/PDFs/w01.pdf
  6. Blood, R. (2002). Weblogs: A history and perspective. Retrieved from http://www.rebeccablood.net/essays/weblog_history.html
  7. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities for the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED326149
  8. Brindley, M. (2008, March 11). Hygiene failures similar to Scottish E.coli outbreak. Western Mail. Retrieved from http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/health-news/2008/03/11/hygiene-failures-similar-to-scottish-e-coli-outbreak-91466-20602271/
  9. British Broadcasting Corporation (2004, December 1). “Blog” picked as word of the year. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4059291.stm
  10. Bukvova, H. (2011). Taking new routes: Blogs, web sites, and scientific publishing. ScieCom Info, 7(2). Retrieved from http://www.sciecom.org/ojs/index.php/sciecominfo/index
  11. Charleston Observatory (2010). Social media and research workflow. Retrieved from University College London, Centre for Information Behaviour and the Evaluation of Research (CIBER) website: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/infostudies/research/ciber/social-media-report.pdf
  12. Clarke, T., & Clarke, E. (2009). Born digital? Pedagogy and computer-assisted learning. Education+Training, 51(5/6), 395–407. doi:10.1108/00400910910987200 Google Scholar
  13. comScore. (2008). comScore reports that more than 14 million U.K. Internet users visited a blog in August. Retrieved from http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2008/10/Blog_Usage_in_UK
  14. comScore. (2010). Orkut continues to lead Brazil’s social networking market, Facebook audience grows fivefold. Retrieved from http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2010/10/Orkut_Continues_to_Lead_Brazil_s_Social_Networking_Market_Facebook_Audience_Grows_Fivefold
  15. Deitering, A. M., & Gronemyer, K. (2011). Beyond peer-reviewed articles: Using blogs to enrich students’ understanding of scholarly work. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(1), 489–503.Google Scholar
  16. Downey, G. (2011, October 20). Blogging for promotion: An immodest proposal [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://blogs.plos.org/neuroanthropology/2011/10/20/blogging-for-promotion-an-immodest-proposal/
  17. Efimova, L. (2009). Mathemagenic. Retrieved from http://blog.mathemagenic.com/phd/
  18. George, D. R., & Dellasega, C. (2011). Use of social media in graduate-level medical humanities education: Two pilot studies from Penn State College of Medicine. Medical Teacher, 33(8), e429–e434. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.586749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glass, A. J. (2002). The war on terrorism goes online: Media and government response to first post-Internet crisis (Working Paper Series #2002-3). Retrieved from The Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy: http://www.hks.harvard.edu/presspol/publications/papers/working_papers/2002_03_glass.pdf
  20. Glassick, C. E., Huber, M. T., & Maeroff, G. I. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  21. Glik, D. C. (2007). Risk communication for public health emergencies. Annual Review of Public Health, 28, 33–54. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hardré, P., & Cox, M. (2009). Evaluating faculty work: Expectations and standards of faculty performance in research universities. Research Papers in Education, 24(4), 383–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Joshi, M., & Chugh, R. (2008). New paradigms in the teaching and learning of accounting: Use of educational blogs for reflective thinking. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 5(3). Retrieved from http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=664
  24. Kellogg Commission on the Future of State and Land-Grant Institutions. (1999). Returning to our roots: The engaged institution. Washington, DC: National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/
  25. Kirkup, G. (2010). Academic blogging: Academic practice and academic identity. London Review of Education, 8(1), 75–84. doi:10.1080/14748460903557803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krimsky, S. (2007). Risk communication in the Internet age: The rise of disorganized skepticism. Environmental Hazards, 7, 157–164. doi:10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.05.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee, L. (2010). Fostering reflective writing and interactive exchange through blogging in an advanced language course. ReCALL, 22(2), 212–227. doi:10.1017/S095834401000008X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leventhal, H., Singer, R., & Jones, S. (1965). Effects on fear and specificity of recommendation upon attitudes and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(1), 20–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li, K. (2009). The effect of a pedagogy model integrated with weblogs on critical thinking skills of students. In Kong, S. C., Ogata, H., Arnseth, H. C., Chan, C. K. K., Hirashima, T., Klett, F., et al. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computers in Education. Hong Kong: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. Retrieved from http://www.icce2009.ied.edu.hk/pdf/C6/proceedings848-855.pdf
  30. Lindgren, L. (2006). Is blogging scholarship? Why do you want to know? Washington University Law Review, 84(5), 1105–1108.Google Scholar
  31. Lordley, D. (2007). Once upon a time… Storytelling to enhance teaching and learning. Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research, 68(1), 30–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martin, A. (2007, October 14). Did your microwave nuke the bacteria? New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/14/business/yourmoney/14feed.html
  33. McGuire, H. (2008). Why academics should blog. Retrieved from http://hughmcguire.net/2008/10/26/why-academics-should-blog/
  34. Mellow, G. O., & Woolis, D. D. (2010). Teetering between eras: Higher education in a global, knowledge networked world. On The Horizon, 18(4), 308–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. National Institute of Food and Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture. (2009). NIFA overview. Retrieved from http://www.csrees.usda.gov/about/background.html
  36. North Carolina State University. (2009). Department of 4-H Youth Development and Family and Consumer Sciences reappointment, promotion and tenure standards and procedures. In Policies, Regulations & Rules (RUL 05.67.9). Retrieved from http://policies.ncsu.edu/rule/rul-05-67-9
  37. O’Connor, B., Balasubramanyan, R., Routedge, B., & Smith, N. (2010). From tweets to polls: Linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Retrieved from http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM10/paper/view/1536/1842
  38. Park, Y., Heo, G. M., & Lee, R. (2011). Blogging for informal learning: Analyzing bloggers’ learning perspective. Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 149–160.Google Scholar
  39. Pennington, H. (2009). The Public Inquiry into the September 2005 Outbreak of E.coli O157 in South Wales. Welsh Government. Retrieved from http://wales.gov.uk/ecolidocs/3008707/reporten.pdf?skip=1&lang=en
  40. Perlmutter, D. D. (2008). Blog Wars. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Phillips, A. (2010). Blog to the future? Journals publishing in the twenty-first century. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 42(1), 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Powell, D. A., Hubbell, A. L., Chapman, B., & Jacob, C. J. (2009). New media for food safety. Food Technology, 63(1), 38–43.Google Scholar
  43. Priem, J., & Hemminger, B. M. (2010). Scientometrics 2.0: Toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. First Monday, 15(7). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2874/2570
  44. Putnam, L. (2011). The changing role of blogs in science information dissemination. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 65. Retrieved from http://www.istl.org/11-spring/article4.html
  45. Rainie, L. (2005). The state of blogging [Data report]. Retrieved from Pew Internet & American Life Project: http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2005/PIP_blogging_data.pdf.pdf
  46. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Labs Technical Journal, 27, 379–423.Google Scholar
  47. Skipper, M. (2006). Would Mendel have been a blogger? Nature Reviews Genetics, 7(9), 664. doi:10.1038/nrg1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sobel, J. (2010). State of the Blogosphere 2010. Retrieved from Technorati: http://technorati.com/blogging/article/state-of-the-blogosphere-2010-introduction/
  49. Swanson, B.E. (2008). Global review of good agricultural extension and advisory service practices. Retrieved from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0261e/i0261e00.pdf
  50. United States Department of Agriculture. (2011). Cooperative Extension System Offices. Retrieved from http://www.csrees.usda.gov/Extension/index.html
  51. Walker, J. (2006). Blogging from inside the Ivory Tower. Retrieved from University of Bergen, Bergen Open Research Archive website: https://bora.uib.no/bitstream/1956/1846/1/Walker-Uses-of-Blogs.pdf
  52. Wardrip–Fruin, N. (2009). Blog-based peer review: Four surprises. Retrieved from http://grandtextauto.org/2009/05/12/blog-based-peer-review-four-surprises/
  53. Weatherill, S. (2009). Report of the independent investigator into the 2008 listeriosis outbreak. Government of Canada. Retrieved from http://www.listeriosis-listeriose.investigation-enquete.gc.ca/index_e.php?s1=rpt&page=tab
  54. Weiser, C. J., & Houglum, L. (1998). Scholarship unbound for the 21st Century. Journal of Extension 36(4). Retrieved from http://www.joe.org/joe/1998august/a1.php
  55. Wise, G., Retzleff, D., & Reilly, K. (2002). Adapting Scholarship Reconsidered and Scholarship Assessed to evaluate University of Wisconsin-Extension outreach faculty for tenure and promotion. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 7(3), 5–18.Google Scholar
  56. Zickuhr, K. (2010). Generations 2010. Retrieved Pew Internet & American Life Project: http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Generations_and_Tech10.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas A. Powell
    • 1
  • Casey J. Jacob
    • 1
  • Benjamin J. Chapman
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic Medicine/PathobiologyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  2. 2.Department of 4-H Youth Development and Family and Consumer SciencesNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations