Advertisement

Innovative Higher Education

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 261–271 | Cite as

Action Research as Signature Pedagogy in an Education Doctorate Program: The Reality and Hope

  • Debby Zambo
Article

Abstract

Debates about the education doctorate continue; and, while some individuals focus on the problematic, others work to distinguish this degree from the Ph.D. The author is part of the latter, and in this article I explain how faculty members at one university are using action research as a signature pedagogy to create stewards of practice, that is, school leaders who have the knowledge, skills, and dispositions to pinpoint educational problems, design solutions, and create effective change. A content analysis of action research dissertations was used to prove stewardship. I investigated the challenges that sparked students’ actions; the actions they took in response; and the benefits, if any, they gained from this experience.

Key words

Action research dissertation Signature pedagogy Education doctorate 

References

  1. Andrews, R., & Grogan, M. (2005). Form should follow function: Removing the Ed.D. dissertation from the Ph.D. straight jacket. UCEA Review, 46(2), 10–13.Google Scholar
  2. Bradbury Huang, H. (2007). What is good action research? Action Research, 8(1), 93–109. doi: 10.1177/1476705310362435 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate. (2010). Working principles for the professional practice doctorate in education. College Park, MD: Author.Google Scholar
  4. Erikson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119–161). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Evans, R. (2007). Comments on Shulman, Golde, Bueschel, and Garabedian: Existing practice is not the template. Educational Researcher, 36(6), 553–559. doi: 10.3102/0013189X07313149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  7. Golde, C. M. (2006). Signature pedagogies in doctoral education: Are they adaptable for the preparation of educational researchers? Educational Researcher, 36(6), 344–351. doi: 10.3102/0013189X07308301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Golde, C. M., & Walker, G. E. (2006). Envisioning the future of doctoral education: Preparing stewards of the discipline. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Greenwood, D. (2007). Teaching/learning action research requires fundamental reforms in public higher education. Action Research, 5(3), 249–264. doi: 10.1177/1476750307081016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hendricks, G. (2009). Improving schools through action research: A comprehensive guide for educators. Boston, MA: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Herr, K., & Anderson, G. L. (2005). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Hinchey, P. A. (2008). Action research primer. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  13. Levine, A. (2005). Educating school leaders. Washington, DC: The Education Schools Project. Retrieved November 12, 2010, from www.edschools.org
  14. Mills, G. E. (2010). Action Research: A Guide for the Teacher Research (43rd Ed.). Boston: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Murphy, J., & Vriesenga, M. (2005). Developing professionally anchored dissertations: Lessons from innovative programs. School Leadership Reviews, 1(1), 33–57.Google Scholar
  16. Perry, J. A., & Imig, D. G. (2008, November/December). A stewardship of practice in education. Change, 42-48.Google Scholar
  17. Pine, G. J. (2009). Teacher action research: Building knowledge democracies. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001). Inquiry and participation in search of a world worthy of human aspiration. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of participatory action research: Participatory inquiry and practice (pp. 1–14). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59. doi: 10.1162/0011526054622015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shulman, L. S. (2007). Practical wisdom in the service of professional practice. Educational Researcher, 36, 560–563. doi: 10.3102/0013189X07313150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shulman, L. S., Golde, C. M., Bueschel, A. C., & Garabedian, K. J. (2006). Reclaiming education’s doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 25–32. doi: 10.3102/0013189X035003025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Walker, G. E., Golde, C. M., Jones, L., Bueschel, A. C., & Hutchings, P. (2008). The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctorial education for the twenty-first century. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  24. Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Teacher Education and LeadershipArizona State UniversityPhoenixUSA

Personalised recommendations