Advertisement

Innovative Higher Education

, 31:175 | Cite as

When Topics are Controversial: Is it Better to Discuss Them Face-to-Face or Online?

  • Katrina A. Meyer
Article

Abstract

Ten students in a graduate-level course on Historical and Policy Perspectives in Higher Education held face-to-face and online discussions on five controversial topics: diversity, academic freedom, political tolerance, affirmative action, and gender. Upon completion of each discussion, they assessed their comfort, honesty, concern for others’ feelings, similarity of feelings to others, and willingness to disagree and then compared the face-to-face and online discussions on these measures. Students’ assessments are complex and indicate that some topics did elicit feelings of discomfort, concern for others’ feelings, and willingness to disagree in the face-to-face discussions. However, despite these feelings, the majority of students continued to prefer the face-to-face discussions. Online discussions were valued to a lesser extent, but a consistent minority of students were more comfortable in that setting. The age and race of the student also created differences in responses.

Key words

face-to-face discussions online discussions age race controversy 

References

  1. American Association of University Professors (2006). Academic freedom and tenures. Retrieved May 25, 2006 from http://www.aaup.org/Com-a/index.htm.
  2. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  3. Chang, M. J., Astin, A. W., & Kim, D. (2004). Cross-racial interaction among undergraduates: Some consequences, causes, and patterns. Research in Higher Education, 45, 529–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gladwell, M. (2002). The tipping point. New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  6. Kozma, R. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Laird, T. F. N. (2005). College students’ experiences with diversity and their effects on academic self-confidence, social agency, and disposition toward critical thinking. Research in Higher Education, 46, 365–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mayhew, M. J., Grunwald, H. E., & Dey, E. L. (2005). Curriculum matters: Creating a positive climate for diversity from the student perspective. Research in Higher Education, 46, 389–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Meyer, K. A. (2004). Putting the distance learning comparison study into perspective: Its role as personal journey research. The Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 7(1). [http://www.westga.edu/%7Edistance/ojdla/spring71/meyer71.html].
  10. Political Gateway. (2006). Ward Churchill’s essay and statement. Retrieved May 25, 2006 from http://www.politicalgateway.com/news/read.html?id=2739.
  11. Russell, T. L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
  12. Smith, P. L., & Dillon, C. (1999). Comparing distance learning and classroom learning: Conceptual considerations. The American Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Stark, J. S., & Lattuca, L. R. (1997). Shaping the college curriculum: Academic plans in action. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  14. Trosset, C. (1998). Obstacles to open discussion and critical thinking: The Grinnell College Study. Change, 30(5), 44–49.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LeadershipThe University of MemphisMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations