Advertisement

Medicare spending, mortality rates, and quality of care

  • Jack Hadley
  • James D. Reschovsky
Article

Abstract

We applied instrumental variable analysis to a sample of 388,690 Medicare beneficiaries predicted to be high-cost cases to estimate the effects of medical care use on the relative odds of death or experiencing an avoidable hospitalization in 2006. Contrary to conclusions from the observational geographic variations literature, the results suggest that greater medical care use is associated with statistically significant and quantitatively meaningful health improvements: a 10% increase in medical care use is associated with a 8.4% decrease in the mortality rate and a 3.8% decrease in the rate of avoidable hospitalizations.

Keywords

Medicare spending Mortality rates Quality of care 

JEL Classification

I12 I18 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: (2004) AHRQ quality indicators—Guide to prevention quality indicators: Hospital admission for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MDGoogle Scholar
  2. Bach P. B. (2010) A map to bad policy-hospital efficiency measures in the Dartmouth Atlas. The New England Journal of Medicine 362(7): 569–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bach P., Schrag D., Begg C. (2004) Resurrecting treatment histories of dead patients: A study design that should be laid to rest. Journal of the American Medical Association 292(22): 2765–2770PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: (2010) Estimated financial effects of the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,” as Amended. Department of Health and Human Services, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  5. Congressional Budget Office: (2005) High-cost Medicare beneficiaries. The Congress of the United States, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. Davidson R., MacKinnon J. G. (1993) Estimation and inference in econometrics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Elliott S. P., Jarosek S., Wilt T., Virnig B. (2010) Reduction in physician reimbursement and use of hormone therapy in prostate cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 102(24): 1826–1834PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fisher E. S., Goodman D., Skinner J., Bronner K. (2009) Health care spending, quality, and outcomes. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, NHGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher E. S., Wennberg D. E., Stukel T. A., Gottlieb D. J., Lucas F. L., Pinder E. L. (2003) The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 2: Health outcomes and satisfaction with care. Annals of Internal Medicine 138(4): 288–299PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilden, D. (2009). McAllen: A tale of three counties. Accessed June 25, 2009, from http://www.thehealthcareblog.
  11. Gottlieb D. J., Zhou W., Song Y., Andrews K. G., Skinner J. S., Sutherland J. M. (2010) Prices don’t drive regional Medicare spending variations. Health Affairs 29(3): 537–543PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grossman M. (1972) The demand for health: A theoretical and empirical investigation. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Hadley J. (2003) Sicker and poorer: The consequences of being uninsured. Medical Care Research and Review 60(2, supplement): 3S–75SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hadley J., Reschovsky J. D., Corey C., Zuckerman S. (2010) Medicare fees and the volume of physician services. Inquiry 46(4): 372–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hadley J., Waidmann T., Zuckerman , S. , Berenson R. (2011) Medical spending and the health of the elderly. Health Services Research 46: 1333–1361 (published online 9 February 2011)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hogan C., Lunney J., Gabel J., Lynn J. (2001) Medicare beneficiaries’ costs of care in the last year of life. Health Affairs 20(1): 188–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Howard D. H., Culler S. D., Druss B. G., Thorpe K. E. (2006) The relationship between ex ante mortality risk and end-of-life medical costs. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 5(1): 37–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Institute of Medicine: (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaestner R., Silber J. H. (2010) New evidence on the efficacy of Medicare spending. The Milbank Quarterly 88(4): 560–594PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kemper P., Blumenthal D., Corrigan J. M., Cunningham P. J., Felt S. M., Grossman J. M. et al (1996) The design of the community tracking study: A longitudinal study of health system change and its effects on people. Inquiry 33(2): 195–206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Landrum M. B., Meara E. R., Chandra A., Guadagnoli E., Keating N. L. (2008) Is spending more always wasteful? The appropriateness of care and outcomes among colorectal cancer patients. Health Affairs 27(1): 159–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McClellan M., Newhouse J. (2000) Overview of special supplemental issue on instrumental variable analysis applications in health services research. Health Services Research 35: 1061–1069PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. (2009). Report to Congress: Measuring regional variation in service use. Washington, DC: Medicare Payment Advisory Commission.Google Scholar
  24. Milyo J., Mellor J. M. (2003) On the importance of age-adjustment methods in ecological studies of social determinants of mortality. Health Services Research 38(6): 1781–1790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Neuberg G. (2009) The cost of end-of-life care: A new efficiency measure falls short of AHA/ACC standards. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 2(2): 127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Newhouse J., McClellan M. (1998) Econometrics in outcomes research: The use of instrumental variables. Annual Review of Public Health 19: 17–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ong M. K., Mangione C. M., Romano P. S., Zhou Q., Auerbach A. D., Chun A., Davidson B., Ganiats T. G., Greenfield S., Gropper M. A., Malik S., Rosenthal J. T., Escarce J. J. (2009) Looking forward, looking back: Assessing variations in hospital resource use and outcomes for elderly patients with heart failure. Journal of the American Heart Association 2: 548–557Google Scholar
  28. Pham H. H., Schrag D., O’Malley A. S., Wu B., Bach P. B. (2007) Care patterns in Medicare and their implications for pay for performance. New England Journal of Medicine 356(11): 1130–1139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pizer S. D. (2009) An intuitive review of methods for observational studies of comparative effectiveness. Health Services Outcomes Research Methods 9: 54–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pope G., Kautter J., Ellis R. et al (2004) Risk adjustment of Medicare capitation payments using the CMS-HCC model. Health Care Financing Review 25(4): 119–141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Reschovsky, J. D., Hadley, J., & Romano, P. (2010). Risk adjustment and geographic variations in Medicare spending. Working paper, Center for Studying Health System Change, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  32. Saultz J. W., Lochner J. (2005) Interpersonal continuity of care and care outcomes: A critical review. Annals of Family Medicine 3(2): 159–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shahinian V., Kuo Y-F., Gilbert S. (2010) Reimbursement policy and Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 363(19): 1822–1832PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Skinner J., Fisher E. S., Wennberg J. E. (2005) The efficiency of Medicare. In: Wise D. A. (eds) Analyses in the economics of aging. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 129–160Google Scholar
  35. Sutherland J. M., Fisher E. S., Skinner J. S. (2009) Getting past denial—the high cost of health care in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine 361(13): 1227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Terza J., Basu A., Rathouz P. (2008) Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: Addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling. Journal of Health Economics 27: 531–543PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thorpe, K. E., & Howard, D. H. (2006). The rise in spending among Medicare beneficiaries: The role of chronic disease prevalence and changes in treatment intensity. Health Affairs 25(5), w378–w388 (Epub 22 Aug 2006).Google Scholar
  38. Williams, S., Potter, F., Diaz-Tena, N., & Strouse, R. (2006). Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Methodology Report 2004–2005 (Round Four). Technical Publication No. 70. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Health and Human ServicesGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.Center for Studying Health System ChangeWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations