Assessing willingness to pay for cancer prevention
- 167 Downloads
Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the U.S. and its economic cost is very high. The objective of this study is to analyze the socioeconomic and demographic factors that are related to the willingness to pay (WTP) for cancer prevention. Data from an experimental module in the 2002 Health and Retirement Study (HRS) were used to identify WTP differences across different population subgroups. Respondents were asked whether they were willing and able to pay different dollar amounts per month for a new cancer prevention drug. Years of age were negatively related to WTP whereas income and the probability of developing cancer were positively related to WTP. Risk-relevant numeracy skills were positively related to self-assessed cancer risk, which may suggest that adults with poor numeracy skills underestimate their cancer risk. This has consequences not only on the relative perceived value of different cancer treatments across different population subgroups but also on perceived value as captured by WTP.
KeywordsWillingness to pay Cancer Prevention
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- American Cancer Society: (2008) Cancer facts & figures 2007. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GeorgiaGoogle Scholar
- Hanneman W. M., Kanninen B. (1999) The statistical analysis of discrete-response CV data. In: Batemen I., Willis K. (eds) Valuing environmental preferences: Theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US, EU and developing countries. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 302–441Google Scholar
- Health and Retirement Study (2006) 2002 Core Final, Version 2.0 (June 2006). Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan. http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/meta/2002/core/desc/h02dd.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2009.
- Leacock, C. P. (2006). Getting started with the health and retirement Study. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan. http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/docs/dmgt/IntroUserGuide.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2009.
- National Cancer Institute (2006). 2006 Fact book. National Cancer Institute. http://obf.cancer.gov/financial/attachments/06Factbk.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2009.
- National Cancer Institute (2007). The nation’s investment in cancer research: A plan and budget proposal for fiscal year 2008. National Cancer Institute. http://plan.cancer.gov/plan_overview.shtml. Accessed 14 Apr 2009.
- National Cancer Institute (2009a). The nation’s investment in cancer research: An annual plan and budget proposal for fiscal year 2010. National Cancer Institute. http://plan.cancer.gov/pdf/nci_2010_plan.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2009.
- National Cancer Institute (2009b). Surveillance epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program devcan database. http://www.seer.cancer.gov. Accessed 16 May 2010.
- Ofstedal, M. B., Fisher, G. G., & Herzog, A. R. (2005). Documentation of cognitive functioning measures in the health and retirement study. HRS Documentation Report DR-006 (March 2005). Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan. http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/docs/userg/dr-006.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2009.
- Viscusi W. K. (1993) The value of risks to life and health. Journal of Economic Literature 31(4): 1912–1946Google Scholar