Has the influence of managed care waned? Evidence from the market for physician services

Article

Abstract

Managed care has been the dominant organization of health care coverage in the United States, and seeks to achieve cost control by constraining services. The restrictive practices of managed care organizations have been widely criticized and the role of managed care in constraining health care services may be declining. Physician behavior is also believed to be influenced by the practices of managed care organization. This study examines the evolving nature of managed care and its restrictive effects on the provision of physician services. Physicians can choose whether and to what extent they are involved in managed care, so it is an endogenous decision. We employ instrumental variables method to correct for this endogeneity. Using data from the Community Tracking Study physician surveys from 2000–2001 and 2004–2005, we find that managed care organizations have became relatively less restrictive over time in terms of limiting the provision of physician services, compared to non-managed care organizations. These results suggest that managed care and non-managed care are converging in their effects on the provision of physician services.

Keywords

Managed care Physician services Physician behavior Endogeneity 

JEL Classification

I11 I18 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker L., Corts K. (1996) HMO penetration and the cost of health care: Market discipline or market segmentation?. The American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 86(2): 389–394Google Scholar
  2. Blendon R., Brodie M., Benson J., Altman D., Levitt L., Hoff T., Hugick L. (1998) Understanding the managed care backlash. Health Affairs 17(4): 80–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Center for Studying Health System Change. (2003a). Community tracking study physician survey 2000–2001 methodology report. Center for Studying Health System Change. Technical Publication No. 38, http://www.hschange.org/CONTENT/570/570a.pdf.
  4. Center for Studying Health System Change. (2003b). Community tracking study physician survey 2000–2001: user guide for restricted-use version of the main data file. First ICPSR version.Google Scholar
  5. Chow G. (1960) Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 28(3): 591–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christianson J., Trude S. (2003) Managing costs, managing benefits: Employer decisions in local health care markets. Health Services Research 38(1 Pt 2): 357–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cutler D., Zeckhauser R. (2000) The anatomy of health insurance. In: Culyer A., Newhouse J. (eds) Handbook of health economics Vol. 1A. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 563–643Google Scholar
  8. Draper D., Hurley R., Lesser C., Strunk B. (2002) The changing face of managed care. Health Affairs 21(1): 11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Enthoven A., Singer S. (1998) The managed care backlash and the task force in California. Health Affairs 17(4): 95–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fang H., Liu H., Rizzo J. (2009) Has the use of physician gatekeepers declined among HMOs? Evidence from the United States. International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics 9(2): 183–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fang H., Rizzo J. (2008) The changing role of managed care on physician financial incentives. The American Journal of Managed Care 14(10): 653–660Google Scholar
  12. Fang, H., & Rizzo, J. (2009). Competition and physician demand enablement: the role of managed care. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (in press). doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2009.05.012
  13. Glied S. (2000) Managed care. In: Culyer A., Newhouse J. (eds) Handbook of health economics Vol. 1A. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 707–754Google Scholar
  14. Glied S., Zivin J. (2002) How do doctors behave when some (but not all) of their patients are in managed care. Journal of Health Economics 21(2): 337–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldman D. (1995) Managed care as a public cost-containment mechanism. The Rand Journal of Economics 26(2): 277–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hausman J. (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46(6): 1251–1271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hausman J. (1983) Specification and estimation of simultaneous equations models. In: Griliches Z., Intriligator M. (eds) Handbook of econometrics Vol. 1. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 391–448Google Scholar
  18. Jauhar, S. (2008). Eyes bloodshot, doctors vent their discontent. The New York Times, June 17.Google Scholar
  19. Jones A. (2000) Health econometrics. In: Culyer A., Newhouse J. (eds) Handbook of health economics Vol. 1A. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 265–344Google Scholar
  20. Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research and Educational Trust (HRET). (2004). Employer health benefits: 2004 Annual Survey, Section 4. http://www.kff.org/insurance/7148/upload/2004-Employer-Health-Benefits-Survey-Full-Report.pdf. Accessed 18 Aug 2009.
  21. Kongstvedt P. (2001) The managed health care handbook (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Publishers, SudburyGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee, J., & Tollen, L. (2002). Impact of reduced benefits and increased cost sharing. Health Affairs, Web Exclusive, W229–W241.Google Scholar
  23. Lindrooth R., Norton E., Dickey B. (2002) Provider selection, bargaining, and utilization management in managed care. Economic Inquiry 40(3): 348–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mays, G., Claxton, G., & White, J. (2004). Managed care rebound? Recent changes in health plans’ cost containment strategies. Health Affairs, Web Exclusive, 427–436.Google Scholar
  25. Miller R., Luft H. (2002) HMO plan performance update: an analysis of the literature, 1997–2001. Health Affairs 21(4): 63–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Newhouse J. (1996) Reimbursing health plans and health providers: efficiency in production versus selection. Journal of Economic Literature 34(3): 1236–1263Google Scholar
  27. Rice T., Morrison K. (1994) Patient cost-sharing for medical services: A review of the literature and implications. Medical Care Review 51(3): 235–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Robinson J. (2001) The end of managed care. Journal of the American Medical Association 285(20): 2622–2628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shea J. (1997) Instrument relevance in multivariate linear models: A simple measure. Review of Economics and Statistics 79(2): 348–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shin J., Moon S. (2007) Do HMO plans reduce health care expenditure in the private sector?. Economic Inquiry 45(1): 82–99Google Scholar
  31. Staiger D., Stock J. (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65(3): 557–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Strunk, B., Ginsburg, & P., Gabel, J. (2002). Tracking health care costs: Growth accelerates again in 2001. Health Affairs Web Exclusive, W299–W310.Google Scholar
  33. Strunk, B., & Reschovsky J. (2002). Kinder and gentler: Physicians and managed care, 1997–2001. Center for studying Health System Change. Tracking Report No. 5. http://www.hschange.com/CONTENT/486/. Accessed 18 Aug 2009.
  34. Terza J., Basu A., Rathouz P. (2008) Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: Addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling. Journal of Health Economics 27(3): 531–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Swartz K. (1999) The death of managed care as we know it. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 24(5): 1201–1205Google Scholar
  36. Wagner T., Hu T., Hibbard J. (2001) The demand for consumer health information. Journal of Health Economics 20(6): 1059–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wooldridge J. (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Health Systems, Management, and Policy, Colorado School of Public HealthUniversity of Colorado DenverAuroraUSA
  2. 2.Department of Economics & Department of Preventive MedicineState University of New York at Stony BrookStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations