Advertisement

Utilisation of physician services in the 50+ population: the relative importance of individual versus institutional factors in 10 European countries

  • Kristian BolinEmail author
  • Anna Lindgren
  • Björn Lindgren
  • Petter Lundborg
Article

Abstract

We analysed the relative importance of individual versus institutional factors in explaining variations in the utilisation of physician services among the 50+ in ten European countries. The importance of the latter was investigated, distinguishing between organisational (explicit) and cultural (implicit) institutional factors, by analysing the influence of supply side factors, such as physician density and physician reimbursement, and demand side factors, such as co-payment and gate-keeping, while controlling for a number of individual characteristics, using cross-national individual-level data from SHARE. Individual differences in health status accounted for about 50% of the between-country variation in physician visits, while the organisational and cultural factors considered each accounted for about 15% of the variation. The organisational variables showed the expected signs, with higher physician density being associated with more visits and higher co-payment, gate-keeping, and salary reimbursement being associated with less visits. When analysing specialist visits separately, however, organisational and cultural factors played a greater role, each accounting for about 30% of the between-country variation, whereas individual health differences only accounted for 11% of the variation.

Keywords

Healthcare utilisation Physician visits Cross-country analysis SHARE Europe 

JEL Classifications

I11 I18 

References

  1. Andersson S.O., Mattsson B. (1989) Length of consultations in general practice in Sweden: Views of doctors and patients. Family Practice 6: 130–134. doi: 10.1093/fampra/6.2.130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anell A. (2005) Swedish healthcare under pressure. Health Economics 14: 237–254. doi: 10.1002/hec.1039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bago d’Uva T. (2005) Latent class models for utilisation of primary care: Evidence from a British panel. Health Economics 14: 873–892. doi: 10.1002/hec.1047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker G. (1964) Human capital. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellanger M.M., Mossé P.R. (2005) The search for the Holy Grail: Combining decentralised planning and contracting mechanisms in the French health care system. Health Economics 14: 119–132. doi: 10.1002/hec.1031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergeron R., Laberge A., Vezina L. (1999) Which physicians make home visits and why? A survey. Canadian Medical Association Journal 161(4): 369–374Google Scholar
  7. Bolin K., Lindgren B., Lundborg P. (2008a) Informal and formal care among single-living elderly in Europe. Health Economics 17(3): 393–410. doi: 10.1002/hec.1275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolin K., Lindgren B., Lundborg P. (2008b) Your next of kin or your own career? Caring and working among the 50+ of Europe. Journal of Health Economics 27: 718–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Börsch-Supan, A., Brugiavini, A., Jürges, H., Mackenbach, J., Siegrist, J., & Weber, G. (Eds). (2005). Health, ageing and retirement in Europe. First results from the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe. Mannheim: Research Institute for the Economics of Aging.Google Scholar
  10. Börsch-Supan, A., & Jürges, H. (Eds). (2005). The survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe—methodology. Mannheim: MEA.Google Scholar
  11. Chiappori P.-A., Durand F., Geoffard P.-Y. (1998) Moral hazard and the demand for physician services: First lessons from a French natural experiment. European Economic Review 42: 499–511. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00015-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daatland S.O., Herlofson K. (2003) “Lost solidarity" or “changed solidarity": A comparative European view of normative family solidarity. Ageing and Society 23: 537–560. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X03001272 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deveugele M., Derese A., De Bacquer D., van den Brink-Muinen A., De Maeseneer J. (2004) Consultation in general practice: A standard operating procedure?. Patient Education and Counseling 54(2): 227–233. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00239-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deveugele M., Derese A., van den Brink-Muinen A., Bensing J., De Maeseneer J. (2002) Consultation length in general practice: cross sectional study in six European countries. British Medical Journal 325: 472. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7362.472 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Exter, A., Hermans, H., Dosljak, M., & Busse, R. (2004). Health care systems in transition: Netherlands. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.Google Scholar
  16. France G., Taroni F., Donatini A. (2005) The Italian health-care system. Health Economics 14: 187–202. doi: 10.1002/hec.1035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Freeman G.K., Horder J.P., Howie J.G.R., Hungin A.P., Hill A.P., Shah N.C. et al (2002) Evolving general practice consultation in Britain: Issues of length and context. British Medical Journal 324: 880–882. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7342.880 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freeman R. (2000) The politics of health in Europe. Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  19. Gerdtham U.-G., Jönsson B. (2000) International comparisons of health expenditure. In: Culyer A.J., Newhouse J.P. (eds) Handbook of health economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 11–54Google Scholar
  20. Gerdtham U.-G., Jönsson B., MacFarlan M., Oxley H. (1998) The determinants of health expenditure in the OECD countries. In: Zweifel P. (eds) Health, the medical profession, and regulation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  21. Gerdtham U.-G., Sögaard J., Andersson F., Jönsson B. (1992) Econometric analysis of health care expenditures: A cross-section study of the OECD countries. Journal of Health Economics 11: 63–84. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(92)90025-V CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grossman, M. (1972a). The demand for health: A theoretical and empirical investigation. New York: Columbia University Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  23. Grossman M. (1972b) On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. The Journal of Political Economy 80: 223–255. doi: 10.1086/259880 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jiménez-Martin S., Labeaga J.M., Martínez-Granado M. (2002) Latent class versus two-part models in the demand for physician services across the European Union. Health Economics 11: 301–321. doi: 10.1002/hec.672 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jiménez-Martin S., Labeaga J.M., Martínez-Granado M. (2004) An empirical analysis of the demand for physician services across the European Union. The European Journal of Health Economics 5: 150–165. doi: 10.1007/s10198-003-0215-0 Google Scholar
  26. Kephart G., Thomas V.S., MacLean D.R. (1998) Socioeconomic differences in the use of physician services in Nova Scotia. American Journal of Public Health 88: 800–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kohli, M., Künemund, H., & Lüdicke, J. (2005). Family structure, proximity and contact. In A. Börsch- Supan, A. Brugiviani, H. Jürges, J. Mackenbach, J. Siegrist, & G. Weber (Eds.), Health, ageing, and retirement in Europe. First results from the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe. Mannheim: Research Institute for the Economics of Aging.Google Scholar
  28. Lancaster K.J. (1966) A new approach to consumer theory. The Journal of Political Economy 74(2): 132–157. doi: 10.1086/259131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Larsson B.W., Larsson G., Chantereau M.W., Staelvon Holstein K. (2005) International comparisons of patients’ views on quality of care. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 18(1): 62–73. doi: 10.1108/09526860510576974 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leu R.E. (1986) The public-private mix and international health care costs. In: Culyer A.J., Jönsson B. (eds) Public and private health services. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  31. Lopez-Casanovas G., Costa-Font J., Planas I. (2005) Diversity and regional inequalities in the Spanish ‘system of health care services’ Health Economics 14: 221–235. doi: 10.1002/hec.1038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mossialos E., Allin S., Davaki K. (2005) Analysing the Greek health system: a tale of fragmentation and inertia. Health Economics 14: 151–168. doi: 10.1002/hec.1033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. OECD. (2003). OECD health data: Statistics and indicators for 30 countries. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/59/47/35529872.xls. (29. 11. 2005).
  34. OECD. (2004). OECD health data 2004. A comparative analysis of 30 countries. OECD Health Data.Google Scholar
  35. Potter S.J., McKinlay J.B. (2005) From a relationship to encounter: An examination of longitudinal and lateral dimensions in the doctor-patient relationship. Social Science and Medicine 61(2): 465–479. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reher D.S. (1998) Family ties in western Europe: Persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review 24: 203–234. doi: 10.2307/2807972 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Riphahn R.T., Wamback A., Million A. (2003) Incentive effects in the demand for health care: a bivariate panel count data estimation. Journal of Applied Econometrics 18: 387–405. doi: 10.1002/jae.680 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rohrer J.E., Culica D.V. (1999) Identifying high-users of medical care in a farming-dependant county. Health Care Management Review 24: 28–34Google Scholar
  39. SHO. (2003). Panorama Gesundheit—die Schweiz im europäischen Vergleich. Swiss Health Observatory, WHO.Google Scholar
  40. Stepan A., Sommersguter-Reichmann M. (2005) Monitoring political decision-making and its impact in Austria. Health Economics 14: 7–23. doi: 10.1002/hec.1026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. van Doorslaer E., Koolman X., Jones A. (2004b) Explaining income-related inequalities in doctor utilisation in Europe. Health Economics 13: 629–647. doi: 10.1002/hec.919 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van Doorslaer, E., Koolman, X., & Puffer, F. (2002). Equity in the use of physician visits in OECD countries: Has equal treatment for equal need been achieved? Measuring up: Improving health systems performance in OECD countries (pp. 25–148). OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  43. van Doorslaer, E., & Masseria, C., & The OECD Health Equity Research Group Members. (2004a). Income-related inequality in the use of medical care in 21 OECD countries. In OECD Health Working Papers No. 14.Google Scholar
  44. van Doorslaer E., Wagstaff A., van der Burg H., Christiansen T., De Graeve D., Duchesne I. et al (2000) Equity in the delivery of health care in Europe and the US. Journal of Health Economics 19: 553–583. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(00)00050-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilson A., Childs S. (2002) The relationship between consultation length, process and outcomes in general practice: A systematic review. The British Journal of General Practice 52(485): 1012–1020Google Scholar
  46. Wörz M., Busse R. (2005) Analysing the impact of health care system change in the EU member states—Germany. Health Economics 14: 133–149. doi: 10.1002/hec.1032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zweifel P., Breyer F. (1997) Health Economics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristian Bolin
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Anna Lindgren
    • 1
    • 4
    • 5
  • Björn Lindgren
    • 1
    • 4
    • 6
    • 7
  • Petter Lundborg
    • 1
    • 8
    • 9
    • 10
  1. 1.LUCHE (Lund University Centre for Health Economics)LundSweden
  2. 2.Vårdal instituteLund UniversityLundSweden
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsLund UniversityLundSweden
  4. 4.Department of Health SciencesLund UniversityLundSweden
  5. 5.Centre for Mathematical SciencesLund UniversityLundSweden
  6. 6.Institute for Economic ResearchLund UniversityLundSweden
  7. 7.National Bureau of Economic ResearchCambridgeUSA
  8. 8.Department of EconomicsFree UniversityAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  9. 9.Tinbergen InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  10. 10.IZABonnGermany

Personalised recommendations