Hospital Health Care: Pricing and Quality Control in a Spatial Model with Asymmetry of Information



The cost of hospital care depends on the quality of the service, on the personal characteristics of the patient, on the effort of the medical staff and on information asymmetry. In this article the cost minimizing properties of alternative payment systems will be discussed in a context where hospitals can observe patient severity and compete according to the rules of Hotelling's spatial competition. The scheme is designed from the standpoint of a purchaser that sets up a contract with several providers for services of a given quality at the least possible cost. Patients' severity cannot be observed and quality cannot be verified, but the latter can be inferred through the choice of patients. The model shows that in the health care market, prospective payments and yardstick competition are weak instruments for cost containment; incentive compatible schemes are, at least from a theoretical point of view, better instruments especially in a context where the purchaser can use signals relating to the variables it cannot observe. Cost inflation has two components: the information rent paid to the provider and inefficiency. In our model the information rent is used by the provider to get more patients to his hospital; spatial competition can then be used to curb the cost of providing hospital care.


asymmetry of information spatial competition cost containment 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baron, D. P. and R. B. Myerson. (1982). “Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Costs.” Econometrica 50(4), 911.Google Scholar
  2. Besley, T. and A. C. Case. (1995). “Incumbent Behaviour: Vote-Seeking, Tax Setting and Yardstick Competition.” American Economic Review 85, 25–45.Google Scholar
  3. Biglaiser, G. and C. A. Ma. (2003). “Price and Quality Competition under Adverse Selection: Market Organization and Efficiency.” Rand Journal of Economics 34(2), 266–286.Google Scholar
  4. Chalkley, M. and J. H. Malcomson. (1998). “Contracting for Health Services with Unmonitored Quality.” Economic Journal 108, 1093–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chalkley, M. and J. H. Malcomson. (2000). “Government Purchasing of Health Services.” In A. J. Culyer and J. P. Newhouse (eds.), Handbook of Health Economics, North-Holland, pp. 461–536.Google Scholar
  6. Chalkley, M. and J. H. Malcomson. (2002). “Cost Sharing in Health Service Provision: An Empirical Assessment of Cost Saving.” Journal of Health Economics 84, 219–249.Google Scholar
  7. Dranove, D. (1988). “Demand Inducement an the Physician-Patient Relationship.” Economic Inquiry 24, 282–298.Google Scholar
  8. Dranove, D., M. Shanley, and C. Simon. (1992). “Is Hospital Competition Wasteful?” Rand Journal of Economics 23(2), 247–262.Google Scholar
  9. Enthoven, A. (2002). “American Health Care in the 1990's: Some lessons for the Europeans.” Paper presented at the 4th European conference on health economics, Paris, 7–10 July.Google Scholar
  10. Ellis, R. (1997). “Creaming, Skimping and Dumping: Provider Competition on Intensive and Extensive Margins.” Journal of Health Economics 17, 537–555.Google Scholar
  11. Ellis, R. and T. McGuire. (1986). “Provider Behaviour under Prospective Reimbursement.” Journal of Health Economics 5(2), 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feld, L. P., J. M. Josselin, and Y. Rocaboy. (2002). “Tax Mimicking: An Application to the French Regions.” Economie et Prevision 156, 43–49.Google Scholar
  13. Gaynor, M. and W. B. Vogt. (2003). “Competition Among Hospitals.” Rand Journal of Economics 34(4), 764–785.Google Scholar
  14. Gravelle, H. (1999). “Capitation Contracts: Access and Quality.” Journal of Health Economics 18, 315–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kessler, D. P and B. McClellan. (2000). “Is Hospital Competition Socially Wasteful?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(2), 577–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Laffont, J. J. and E. J. Tirole. (1993). A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Laffont, J.J. and D. Martimort. (2002). The Theory of Incentives: The Principal Agent Model. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Levaggi, R. (1996). “NHS Contracts: An Agency Approach.” Health Economics 5, 341–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Levaggi, R. (1999). “Optimal Procurement Contracts under a Binding Budget Constraint.” Public Choice 101(1/2), 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Levaggi, R. (2004). “Asymmetry of Information in a Mixed Oligopoly Market for Health Care.” mimeo.Google Scholar
  21. Levaggi, R. (2005). “Hospital care organization in Italy: A Theoretical Assessment of the Reform.” = 585562.
  22. Levaggi, R. and L. Rochaix. (2004). “Exit or Loyalty? Patient Driven Competition in primary Care.” = 550721.
  23. Levaggi, R. and M. Moretto. (2004). “Investment in Hospital Care Technology Under Different Purchasing Rules: A Real Option Approach.” FEEM Working Paper No. 75.04 = 536002 .
  24. Levaggi, R. and M. Montefiori (2005). “It Takes three to Tango: Soft Budget Constraint and Cream Skimming in the Hospital Care Market,” = 756628.
  25. Lewis, T. R. and D. E. M. Sappington. (1999). “Cream Skimming, Cost Sharing, and Subjective Risk Adjusting in the Health Industry.” Journal of Economics and Management 8(3), 351–382.Google Scholar
  26. Ma, C. A. (1994). “Health Care Payment Systems: Costs and Quality Incentives.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 3(1), 93–112.Google Scholar
  27. Newhouse, J. (1996). “Reimbursing Health Plans and Health Providers: Efficiency in Production vs. Selection.” Journal of Economic Literature 34, 1236–1263.Google Scholar
  28. Rees, R. (1985). “The Theory of Principal and Agent: Part 1.” Bulletin of Economic Research 37(1), 3–26.Google Scholar
  29. Salmon, P. (1987). “Decentralisation as an incentive scheme.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2, 24–43.Google Scholar
  30. Sappington, D. E. M. (1983). “Limited liability contracts between Principal and Agent.” Journal of Economic Theory 29, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shleifer, A. (1985). “A Theory of Yardstick Competition.” Rand Journal of Economics 16, 319–327.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze EconomicheUniversità di BresciaBrescia

Personalised recommendations