Advertisement

Hyperfine Interactions

, 240:35 | Cite as

Realistic 3D implementation of electrostatic elements for low energy machines

  • V. RodinEmail author
  • J. R. Hunt
  • J. Resta-Lopez
  • B. Veglia
  • C. P. Welsch
Open Access
Article
  • 64 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Low Energy Antiproton Physics (LEAP 2018) Paris, France, 12-16 March 2018

Abstract

Novel antimatter experiments at CERN require high intensity, low energy (<100 keV) antiproton beams. Each experiment has a set of desirable beam parameters. To achieve this, and obtain the greatest efficiency, transfer lines will be based on electrostatic optics. Unfortunately, only a small amount of simulation codes allow realistic and flexible implementation of such elements. In this contribution, methods for accurately creating and tracking through electrostatic optical elements are presented, utilising a combination of a modified version of G4Beamline (Roberts and Kaplan 2007) and finite element methods (FEM). To validate our approaches the transfer line from the ELENA (Chohan et al. 2014) ring to the ALPHA experiment was chosen as a basis for particle tracking studies. A range of approaches to modelling the electrostatic elements were explored, ranging from simple field expressions, to the complex field maps used in the final model. An investigation into the achievable beam quality at ALPHA is presented.

Keywords

ELENA G4Beamline Antimatter Electrostatic optics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our friends and colleagues at CERN for their helpful input and collaboration.

Funding Information

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 721559.

References

  1. 1.
    Roberts, T.J., Kaplan, D.M.: G4beamline simulation program for matter-dominated beamlines. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC’07), Albuquerque, USA, paper THPAN103, pp. 3468–3470 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chohan, V., et al. (ed.): Extra Low Energy Antiproton ring (ELENA) and its Transfer Lines. Design Report, CERN-2014-002 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moller, S.P.: ELISA, an electrostatic storage ring for atomic physics. Nucl. Instr. Meth. 394(3), 281–286 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ghazaly, M.O.E.: ELASR—an electrostatic storage ring for atomic and molecular physics at KACST. Results Phys. 5, 60 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Widmann, E.: Low-energy antiprotons physics and the FLAIR facility. Phys. Scr. 2015(T166), 014074 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ahmadi, M., et al.: Observation of the 1S–2S tranition in trapped antihydrogen. Nature 541, 506–510 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    MAD - Methodical Accelerator Design, http://mad.web.cern.ch/mad/
  8. 8.
    Chauvie, S., et al.: Geant4 model for the stopping power of low energy negatively charged hadrons. IEEE 54(3), 578–584 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Enge, H.A.: Deflecting magnets. In: Septier, A. (ed.) Focusing of Charged Particles, vol. 2, pp. 203–264. Academic Press, New York (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    ANSYS®; Academic Research Mechanical, Release 18.1, https://www.ansys.com/en-gb/academic/
  13. 13.
    Hunt, J.R., et al.: Emittance measurements in low energy ion storage rings. Nucl. Instr. Methods 896, 139–151 (2018)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kainz, A., et al.: Distortion-free measurement of electric field strength with a MEMS sensor. Nat. Electron. 1, 68–73 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Liverpool and The Cockcroft InstituteLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations