Advertisement

Using Nab to determine correlations in unpolarized neutron decay

  • L. J. Broussard
  • S. Baeßler
  • T. L. Bailey
  • N. Birge
  • J. D. Bowman
  • C. B. Crawford
  • C. Cude-Woods
  • D. E. Fellers
  • N. Fomin
  • E. Frlež
  • M. T. W. Gericke
  • L. Hayen
  • A. P. Jezghani
  • H. Li
  • N. Macsai
  • M. F. Makela
  • R. R. Mammei
  • D. Mathews
  • P. L. McGaughey
  • P. E. Mueller
  • D. Počanić
  • C. A. Royse
  • A. Salas-Bacci
  • S. K. L. Sjue
  • J. C. Ramsey
  • N. Severijns
  • E. C. Smith
  • J. Wexler
  • R. A. Whitehead
  • A. R. Young
  • B. A. Zeck
Article
  • 11 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Symmetries in Subatomic Physics (SSP 2018), Aachen, Germany, 10-15 June 2018

Abstract

The Nab experiment will measure the ratio of the weak axial-vector and vector coupling constants λ = gA/gV with precision δλ/λ ∼ 3 × 10− 4 and search for a Fierz term bF at a level ΔbF < 10− 3. The Nab detection system uses thick, large area, segmented silicon detectors to very precisely determine the decay proton’s time of flight and the decay electron’s energy in coincidence and reconstruct the correlation between the antineutrino and electron momenta. Excellent understanding of systematic effects affecting timing and energy reconstruction using this detection system are required. To explore these effects, a series of ex situ studies have been undertaken, including a search for a Fierz term at a less sensitive level of ΔbF < 10− 2 in the beta decay of 45Ca using the UCNA spectrometer.

Keywords

Neutron beta decay Nuclear beta decay Beta spectrum Silicon detector 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Research was sponsored by the Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program [project 8215] of Oak Ridge National Laboratory, managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, for the U. S. Department of Energy, and by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics [contracts DE-AC05-00OR2272, DE-AC52-06NA25396, DE-FG02-03ER41258, DE-FG02-ER41042, DE-SC0008107, and DE-SC0014622], the National Science Foundation [contracts 1126683, 1506320, 1614839, 1615153], the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [contract SAPPJ/32-2016], and the Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO). We are grateful to the UCNA collaboration for use of their spectrometer.

References

  1. 1.
    González-Alonso, M., Naviliat-Cuncic, O., Severijns, N.: New physics searches in nuclear and neutron β decay. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 104, 165–223 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.08.002. arXiv:1803.08732 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hardy, J.C., Towner, I.S.: . Phys. Rev. C 91(2), 025501 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.025501 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tanabashi, M., et al.: Review of particle physics. Phys. Rev. D98(3), 030001 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.030001 ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hickerson, K.P., et al.: . Phys. Rev. C 96(4), 042501 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.042501 [Addendum: Phys. Rev.C96,no.5,059901(2017)]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    González-Alonso, M., Naviliat-Cuncic, O.: . Phys. Rev. C 94(3), 035503 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.035503 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hayen, L., Severijns, N., Bodek, K., Rozpedzik, D., Mougeot, X.: . Rev. Mod. Phys. 90(1), 015008 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015008 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baeßler, S., et al.: . AIP Conf. Proc. 1560, 114 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4826731 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Salas-Bacci, A., et al.: . Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A735, 408 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2013.09.059 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Broussard, L. J., et al.: . Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A849, 83 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2016.12.030 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Broussard, L.J., et al.: . J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 876(1), 012005 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/876/1/012005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harrison, D.: Low-energy proton accelerator for detector testing. The University of Manitoba, Master’s thesis (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Radford, D.: SIGGEN. http://radware.phy.ornl.gov/gretina/siggen (2017)
  13. 13.
    Agostinelli, S., et al.: . Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506, 250 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Salvat, F., Fernández-Varea, J.M., Sempau, J.: . http://www.oecd-nea.org/globalsearch/download.php?doc=77434 (2011)
  15. 15.
    Plaster, B., et al.: . Phys. Rev. C86, 055501 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.86.055501 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. J. Broussard
    • 1
  • S. Baeßler
    • 2
  • T. L. Bailey
    • 3
  • N. Birge
    • 4
  • J. D. Bowman
    • 1
  • C. B. Crawford
    • 5
  • C. Cude-Woods
    • 3
    • 6
  • D. E. Fellers
    • 6
  • N. Fomin
    • 4
  • E. Frlež
    • 2
  • M. T. W. Gericke
    • 7
  • L. Hayen
    • 8
  • A. P. Jezghani
    • 5
  • H. Li
    • 2
  • N. Macsai
    • 7
  • M. F. Makela
    • 6
  • R. R. Mammei
    • 9
  • D. Mathews
    • 5
  • P. L. McGaughey
    • 6
  • P. E. Mueller
    • 1
  • D. Počanić
    • 2
  • C. A. Royse
    • 3
  • A. Salas-Bacci
    • 2
  • S. K. L. Sjue
    • 6
  • J. C. Ramsey
    • 1
  • N. Severijns
    • 8
  • E. C. Smith
    • 6
  • J. Wexler
    • 3
  • R. A. Whitehead
    • 4
  • A. R. Young
    • 3
  • B. A. Zeck
    • 3
    • 6
  1. 1.Oak Ridge National LaboratoryOak RidgeUSA
  2. 2.University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  3. 3.North Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  4. 4.University of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  5. 5.University of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  6. 6.Los Alamos National LaboratoryLos AlamosUSA
  7. 7.University of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
  8. 8.Instituut voor Kern-en StralingsfysicaKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  9. 9.University of WinnipegWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations