Advertisement

Hyperfine Interactions

, 239:41 | Cite as

Antihydrogen formation via antiproton scattering on positronium between the \(e^{-} +\bar {H}(n = 2)\) and \(e^{-}+\bar {H}(n = 3)\) thresholds

  • Marianne DufourEmail author
  • Mateo Valdes
  • Rimantas Lazauskas
  • Paul-Antoine Hervieux
Article
  • 23 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Low Energy Antiproton Physics (LEAP 2018) Paris, France, 12-16 March 2018

Abstract

The charge exchange reaction \(\bar {\mathrm {p}} + \text {Ps} \rightarrow \mathrm {e}^{-} + \bar {\mathrm {H}} \), of interest for the future experiments (GBAR, AEGIS, ATRAP, ...) aiming to produce antihydrogen atoms, is investigated in the energy range between the \(\mathrm {e}^{-}+\bar {\mathrm {H}}(n = 2)\) and \(\mathrm {e}^{-}+\bar {\mathrm {H}}(n = 3)\) thresholds. An ab-initio method based on the solution of the Faddeev-Merkuriev equations is used. Special focus is put on the impact of the Feshbach resonances and the Gailitis-Damburg oscillations, appearing in the vicinity of the \(\bar {\mathrm {p}} +\text {Ps}(n = 2)\) threshold, on the \(\bar {\mathrm {H}}\) production cross section.

Keywords

Faddeev-Merkuriev equations Feshbach resonances Gailitis oscillations Antimatter GBAR 

PACS

31.15.ac 03.65.Nk 34.80.Lx 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was granted access to the HPC resources of TGCC/IDRIS under the allocation 2016-x2016056006 made by GENCI (Grand Equipement National de Calcul Intensif). Part of the calculations have been also realized at Mésocentre (Université de Strasbourg).

References

  1. 1.
    Gibney, E.: The antimatter race. Nature 548, 20 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Debu, P.: Status report on the GBAR CERN experiment. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 460, 012008 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/460/1/012008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gailitis, M., Damburg, R.: Some features of the threshold behaviour of the cross sections for excitation of hydrogen by electrons due to the existance of a linear Stark effect in hydrogen. Sov. Phys. JETP 17, 1107 (1963)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gailitis, M.: The influence of finite masses on the threshold behaviour of scattering in a three charged particle system. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 15, 3423 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Valdes, M., Dufour, M., Lazauskas, R., Hervieux, P.A.: Ab initio calculations of scattering cross sections of the three-body system (\(\overline {p}, {e}^{+}, {e}^{-}\)) between the \({e}^{-}+\overline {\mathrm {H}}(n = 2)\) and \({e}^{-}+\overline {\mathrm {H}}(n = 3)\) thresholds. Phys. Rev. A 97, 012709 (2018). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.012709 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Faddeev, L., Merkuriev, S.: Quantum Scattering Theory for Several Particle Systems (Dordrecht:Kluwer) ch 7 (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baye, D.: The Lagrange-mesh method. Phys. Rep. 1, 565 (2015)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kadyrov, A. S., Rawlins, C. M., Stelbovics, A. T., Bray, I., Charlton, M.: Antihydrogen formation via antiproton scattering with excited positronium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 183201 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rawlins, C.M., Kadyrov, A.S., Stelbovics, A.T., Bray, I., Charlton, M.: Calculation of antihydrogen formation via antiproton scatterin with excited positronium. Phys. Rev. A 93, 012709 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kadyrov, A., Bray, I., Charlton, M., Fabrikant, I.: Quantum suppression of antihydrogen formation in positronium-antiproton scattering. Nat. Commun. 8, 1544 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hu, C.Y., Caballero, D., Papp, Z.: Inducted long-range dipole-field-enhanced antihydrogen formation in the \(\bar {p}+ps(n = 2) e^{-} + H(n2)\) reaction. Phys. Rev. Lett 88, 063401 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hu, C.Y., Caballero, D., Hlousek, Z.: Long-range correlation in positron-hydrogen scattering system near the threshold of Ps(n = 2) formation. J. Mod. Phys. 4, 622 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lazauskas, R., Hervieux, P.A., Dufour, M., Valdes, M.: Resonant antihydrogen formation in antiproton-positronium collisions. J.Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 49(4pp), 094002 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Umair, M., Jonsell, S.: Natural and unnatural parity resonance states in positron-hydrogen scattering. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys 47, 225001 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fabrikant, I.I., Bray, A.W., Kadyrov, A.S., Bray, I.: Near-threshold behaviour of positronium-antiproton scattering. Phys. Rev. A 94, 012701 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178Université de StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance
  2. 2.CNRS, IPCMS UMR 7504Université de StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance

Personalised recommendations