Hyperfine Interactions

, 238:36 | Cite as

Estimation of ΔR/R values by benchmark study of the Mössbauer Isomer shifts for Ru, Os complexes using relativistic DFT calculations

  • Masashi Kaneko
  • Hiroki Yasuhara
  • Sunao Miyashita
  • Satoru Nakashima
Article
First Online:
  • 70 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Proceedings of the 15th Latin American Conference on the Applications of the Mössbauer Effect (LACAME 2016), 13-18 November 2016, Panama City, Panama

Abstract

The present study applies all-electron relativistic DFT calculation with Douglas-Kroll-Hess (DKH) Hamiltonian to each ten sets of Ru and Os compounds. We perform the benchmark investigation of three density functionals (BP86, B3LYP and B2PLYP) using segmented all-electron relativistically contracted (SARC) basis set with the experimental Mössbauer isomer shifts for 99Ru and 189Os nuclides. Geometry optimizations at BP86 theory of level locate the structure in a local minimum. We calculate the contact density to the wavefunction obtained by a single point calculation. All functionals show the good linear correlation with experimental isomer shifts for both 99Ru and 189Os. Especially, B3LYP functional gives a stronger correlation compared to BP86 and B2PLYP functionals. The comparison of contact density between SARC and well-tempered basis set (WTBS) indicated that the numerical convergence of contact density cannot be obtained, but the reproducibility is less sensitive to the choice of basis set. We also estimate the values of ΔR/R, which is an important nuclear constant, for 99Ru and 189Os nuclides by using the benchmark results. The sign of the calculated ΔR/R values is consistent with the predicted data for 99Ru and 189Os. We obtain computationally the ΔR/R values of 99Ru and 189Os (36.2 keV) as 2.35×10−4 and −0.20×10−4, respectively, at B3LYP level for SARC basis set.

Keywords

Mössbauer isomer shift Density functional theory Benchmark study ΔR/R 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Gütlich, P., Link, R., Trautwein, A.: Mössbauer Spectroscopy and Transition Metal Chemistry. Springer, Heidelberg (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Neese, F., Petrenko, T.: Quantum chemistry and Mössbauer spectroscopy. In: Gütlich, P., Bill, E., Trautwein, A.X. (eds.) Mössbauer Spectroscopy and Transition Metal Chemistry –Fundamentals and Applications, pp 137–200. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaneko, M., Miyashita, S., Nakashima, S.: Benchmark study of Mössbauer isomer shifts of Eu and Np complexes by relativistic DFT calculations for understanding the bonding nature of f-Block compounds. Dalton Trans. 44, 8080–8088 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaneko, M., Miyashita, S., Nakashima, S.: Bonding study on the chemical separation of am(III) from eu(III) by S-, S-, and O-Donor ligands by means of all-electron ZORA-DFT calculation. Inorg. Chem. 54, 7103–7109 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang, Y., Mao, J., Oldfield, E.: 57Fe Mössbauer isomer shifts of heme protein model systems: electronic structure calculations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 7829–7839 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neese, F.: Prediction and interpretation of the 57Fe isomer shifts in Mössbauer spectra by density functional theory. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 337, 181–192 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nemykin, V. N., Hadt, R. G.: Influence of hartree-fock exchange on the calculated Mössbauer isomer shifts and quadrupole splittings in ferrocene derivatives using density functional theory. Inorg. Chem. 45, 8297–8307 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Filatov, M.: First principles calculation of Mössbauer isomer shift. Coord. Chem. Rev. 253, 594–605 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Römelt, M., Ye, S., Neese, F.: Calibration of modern density functional theory methods for the prediction of 57Fe Mössbauer isomer shifts: meta-GGA and double-hybrid functionals. Inorg. Chem. 48, 784–785 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neese, F.: The ORCA program system. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2, 73–78 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nakajima, T., Hirao, K.: The Douglas-Kroll-Hess approach. Chem. Rev. 112, 385–402 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Visscher, L., Dyall, K. G.: Dirac-Fock Atomic electronic structure calculations using differenct nuclear charge distributions. Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tabl. 67, 207–224 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Filatov, M.: On the calculation of Mössbauer isomer shift. J. Chem. Phys. 127, 0841011–0841018 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koch, K., Koepernik, K., Van Neck, D., Rosner, H., Cottenier, S.: Electron penetration into the nucleus and its effect on the quadrupole interaction. Phys. Rev. A 81, 0325071–03250716 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pantazis, D. A., Chen, X., Landis, C. R., Neese, F.: All-Electron scalar relativistic basis sets for third-row transition metal atoms. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 908–919 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ahlrichs, R., May, K.: Contracted all-electron gaussian basis sets for atoms Rb to Xe. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2, 943–945 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Neese, F.: An improvement of the resolution of the identity approximation for the formation of the coulomb matrix. J. Comput. Chem. 35, 1740–1747 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Neese, F., Wennmohs, F., Hansen, A., Becker, U.: Efficient, approximate and parallel hartree-fock and hybrid DFT calculations. A ‘chain-of-spheres’ algorithm for the Hartree-Fock exchange. Chem. Phys. 356, 98–109 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hardgrove, G. L., Templeton, D. H.: The crystal structure of ruthenocene. Acta Cryst. 12, 28–32 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bobyens, J. C., Levendis, D. C., Bruce, A. I., Williams, M. L.: Crystal structure of Osmocene, Os(η-C5 H 5)2. J. Crystallogr. Spectrosc. Res. 16, 13244–13249 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Biner, B., Burgi, H. B., Ludi, A., Rohr, C.: Crystal and molecular structures of [Ru(byp)3](PF6)3 and [Ru(bpy)3](PF6)2 at 105 K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 5197–5203 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Constable, E. C., Raithby, P. R., Smit, D. N.: The x-ray crystal structure of tris(2,2’-bipyridine)osmium(II) Hexafluorophosphate. Polyhedron 8, 367–369 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kaindl, G., Potzel, W., Wagner, F., Zahn, U., Mössbauer, R. L.: Isomer shifts of the 90 keV γ-rays of 99ru in ruthenium compounds. Z. Physik 226, 103–115 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Potzel, W., Wagner, F. E., Zahn, U., Mössbauer, R. L., Danon, J.: Isomer shifts and chemical bonding in ruthenium complexes. Z. Physik 240, 306–313 (1970)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wagner, F. E., Kucheida, D., Zahn, U., Kaindl, G.: Mössbauer isomer shifts and quadrupole splittings in osmium compounds. Z. Physik 266, 223–232 (1974)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Huzinaga, S., Miguel, B.: A comparison of the geometrical sequence formula and the well-tempered formulas for generating GTO basis orbital exponents. Chem. Phys. Lett. 175, 289–291 (1990)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Huzinaga, S., Klobukowski, M.: Well-Tempered Gaussian basis sets for the calculation of matix Hartree-Fock wavefunctions. Chem. Phys. Lett. 212, 260–264 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kurian, R., Filatov, M.: DFT approach to the calculation of Mössbauer isomer shifts. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 278–285 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masashi Kaneko
    • 1
  • Hiroki Yasuhara
    • 2
  • Sunao Miyashita
    • 2
  • Satoru Nakashima
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Nuclear Science and Engineering CenterJapan Atomic Energy AgencyTokaimuraJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of ScienceHiroshima UniversityHigashi-HiroshimaJapan
  3. 3.Natural Science Center for Basic Research and DevelopmentHiroshima UniversityHigashi-HiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations