Hyperfine Interactions

, Volume 158, Issue 1–4, pp 117–124

Mössbauer In Situ Studies of the Surface of Mars

Article

Abstract

For the first time in history, a Mössbauer spectrometer was placed on the surface of another planet. Our miniaturized Mössbauer spectrometer MIMOS II [1, 2, 3, 4] (Figure 2) is part of the instrument payload of NASA’s twin Mars Exploration Rovers (MER) “Spirit” and “Opportunity” (see Figure 1), which in January 2004 successfully landed at the Gusev crater and the Meridiani Planum landing sites, respectively. MIMOS II determines the Fe-bearing mineralogy of Martian soils and rocks at the Rovers’ respective landing sites [5]. The main goals of this planetary twin mission are to: (1) identify hydrologic, hydrothermal, and other processes that have operated and affected materials at the landing sites; (2) identify and investigate the rocks and soils at both landing sites, as there is a possible chance that they may preserve evidence of ancient environmental conditions and possible prebiotic or biotic activities. With MIMOS II, besides other minerals the Fe silicate olivine has been identified in both soil and rocks at both landing sites. At the Meridiani site the Fe sulfate jarosite has been identified by MIMOS II which is definitive mineralogical proof of the presence of water at this site in the past.

Key Words

Hematite Jarosite Mars miniaturised Mössbauer spectrometer Mössbauer effect instrumentation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Klingelhöfer G., Morris R. V., Bernhardt B., Rodionov D., de Souza P. A. Jr., Squyres S. W., Foh J., Kankeleit E., Bonnes U., Gellert R., Schröder Ch., Linkin S., Evlanov E., Zubkov B. and Prilutski O., J. Geophys. Res. 108(E12) (2003), 8067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Klingelhöfer G., In: Miglierini M. and Petridis D. (eds.), Mössbauer Spectroscopy in Materials Science, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1999.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Klingelhöfer G., Hyperfine Interact. 113 (1998), 369–374.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Squyres S. W. et al., J. Geophys. Res. 108(E12) (2003), 8062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Several papers in special volume of: Science, vol. 305 (6 August 2004).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klingelhöfer G., Morris R. V., Bernhardt B., Schröder C., Rodionov D. S., de Souza P. A. Jr., Yen A., Gellert R., Evlanov E. N., Zubkov B., Foh J., Bonnes U., Kankleit E., Gütlich P., Ming D. W., Renz F., Wdowiak T., Squyres S. W. and Arvidson R. E., Science 306 (3 December 2004), 1740–1745.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morris R. V., Klingelhöfer G., Bernhardt B., Schröder C., Rodionov D. S., de Souza P. A. Jr., Yen A., Gellert R., Evlanov E. N., Foh J., Kankleit E., Gütlich P., Ming D. W., Renz F., Wdowiak T., Squyres S. W. and Arvidson R. E., Science 305 (6 August 2004), 833–836.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Inst. Anorganische & Analytische ChemieJohannes Gutenberg UniversitätMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations