Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Mosquito larvae consumption in turbid waters: the role of the type of turbidity and the larval stage in native and invasive fish

Abstract

Agricultural runoff and biological invasions alter native species interactions with implications for the management of pests. Here, we used live larvae of common house mosquito Culex pipiens to test the efficiencies of the invasive fish Gambusia holbrooki and the IUCN endangered fish Aphanius iberus to manage mosquitoes at three ecologically relevant concentrations of algae and clay. Both species reduced mosquito abundance in aquaria and outdoor mesocosms though A. iberus reduced it at a slower pace. However, G. holbrooki preferentially captured larger larvae at all fish sizes, whereas smaller individuals of A. iberus captured higher number of smaller larvae. Algal turbidity, but not clay, reduced the efficiency of both species, probably because of an adaptation to inorganic turbidity. Fish efficiency was not reduced in mesocosms where fish captured mosquito larvae interacting with natural invertebrate assemblages. Managers should maintain algal turbidity at < 10 FTU based on the visual detection threshold for both species. Our study shows that algal turbidity threatens the potential of waterbodies to naturally control mosquitoes and discusses why the faster foraging rates of alien species such as G. holbrooki should not be used to justify more introductions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Alcaraz, C. & E. García-Berthou, 2007. Food of an endangered cyprinodont (Aphanius iberus): ontogenetic diet shift and prey electivity. Environmental Biology of Fishes 78: 193–207.

  2. Alcaraz, C., A. Bisazza & E. García-Berthou, 2007. Salinity mediates the competitive interactions between invasive mosquitofish and an endangered fish. Oecologia 155: 205–213.

  3. Asimeng, E. J. & M. J. Mutinga, 1992. Field evaluation of Tilapia zilli (Gervais) as a biological control agent for mosquito control. Biological Control 2: 317–320.

  4. Bates, D., M. Maechler, B. Bolker & S. Walker, 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67: 1–48.

  5. Becker, N., D. Petrić, C. Boase, J. Lane, M. Zgomba, C. Dahl & A. Kaiser, 2010. Mosquitoes and Their Control, 2nd ed. Springer, Heidelberg.

  6. Billman, E. J., E. J. Wagner & R. E. Arndt, 2007. A comparison of mosquito consumption and prey selection between least chub (Iotichthys phlegethontis) and western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). Western North American Naturalist 67: 71–79.

  7. Bin Omar, A. & M. Bin MatJafri, 2009. Turbidimeter design and analysis: a review on optical fiber sensors for the measurement of water turbidity. Sensors 9: 8311–8335.

  8. Blanco, S., S. Romo & M. J. Villena, 2004. Experimental study on the diet of mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) under different ecological conditions in a shallow lake. International Review of Hydrobiology 89: 250–262.

  9. Caiola, N. & A. de Sostoa, 2005. Possible reasons for the decline of two native toothcarps in the Iberian Peninsula: evidence of competition with the introduced Eastern mosquitofish. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 21: 358–363.

  10. Cano-Rocabayera, O., A. de Sostoa, L. Coll & A. Maceda-Veiga, 2019. Managing small, highly prolific invasive aquatic species: exploring an ecosystem approach for the eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki). Science of the Total Environment 673: 594–604.

  11. Cardona, L., 2006. Trophic cascades uncoupled in a coastal marsh ecosystem. Biological Invasions 8: 835–842.

  12. Carpenter, S. R., 2005. Eutrophication of aquatic ecosystems: bistability and soil phosphorus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 102: 10002–10005.

  13. Clements, A. N., 1992. The biology of mosquitoes. In Development, Nutrition and Reproduction, Volume 1. Chapman and Hall, London.

  14. Cronin, T. W., S. Johnsen, N. J. Marshall & E. J. Warrant, 2014. Visual Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

  15. De Buen, F., 1929. La invasión de nuestras aguas dulces por las Gambusias (Gambusia holbrooki Grd.). Revista de Biología forestal y Limnología 1: 49–53.

  16. de-Bashan, L. E., Y. Bashan, M. Moreno, V. K. Lebsky & J. J. Bustillos, 2002. Increased pigment and lipid content, lipid variety, and cell and population size of the microalgae Chlorella spp. when co-immobilized in alginate beads with the microalgae-growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum brasilense. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 48: 514–521.

  17. Doadrio, I., 2002. Atlas y libro de los peces continentales de España, 2nd ed. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza, Madrid.

  18. Eritja, R., J. R. B. Palmer, D. Roiz, I. Sanpera-Calbet & F. Bartumeus, 2017. Direct evidence of adult Aedes albopictus dispersal by car. Scientific Reports 7: 14399.

  19. Ford, M., 2016. Project Fartet, Barcelona (2007–2013): A Case of Conflicting Interests. Saving Freshwater Fishes and Habitats. Newsletter of the IUCN SSC/WI Freshwater Fish Specialist Group. Issue 11, May 2016.

  20. Fox, J. & S. Weisberg, 2011. An R Companion to Applied Regression, 2nd edition. Sage, Thousand Oaks [available on internet at http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion]. Accessed May 2019.

  21. Fryxell, D. C., H. A. Arnett, T. M. Apgar, M. T. Kinnison & E. P. Palkovacs, 2015. Sex ratio variation shapes the ecological effects of a globally introduced freshwater fish. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282: 20151970.

  22. Garchitorena, A., S. H. Sokolow, B. Roche, C. N. Ngonghala, M. Jocque, A. Lund, M. Barry, E. A. Mordecai, G. C. Daily, J. H. Jones, J. R. Andrews, E. Bendavid, S. P. Luby, A. D. LaBeaud, K. Seetah, J. F. Guégan, M. H. Bonds & G. A. De Leo, 2017. Disease ecology, health and the environment: a framework to account for ecological and socio-economic drivers in the control of neglected tropical diseases. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 372: 20160128.

  23. Haas, R., 1982. Notes on the ecology of Aphanius dispar (Pisces, Cyprinodontidae) in the Sultanate of Oman. Freshwater Biology 12: 89–95.

  24. Hartman, E. J. & M. V. Abrahams, 2000. Sensory compensation and the detection of predators: the interaction between chemical and visual information. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B: Biological Sciences 267: 571–575.

  25. Homski, D., M. Goren & A. Gasith, 1994. Comparative evaluation of the larvivorous fish Gambusia affinis and Aphanius dispar as mosquito control agents. Hydrobiologia 284: 137–146.

  26. Horppila, J., A. Liljendahl-Nurminen & T. Malinen, 2004. Effects of clay turbidity and light on the predator–prey interaction between smelts and chaoborids. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61: 1862–1870.

  27. Hotez, P. J., 2016. Neglected tropical diseases in the Anthropocene: the cases of Zika, Ebola, and other infections. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 10: e0004648.

  28. Jaeger, B., 2017. R2glmm: Computes R Squared for Mixed (Multilevel) Models, R package version 0.1.2 [available on internet at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=r2glmm]. Accessed May 2019.

  29. Kadlec, R. H., 2009. Wetlands for contaminant and wastewater treatment. In Maltby, E. & T. Barker (eds), The Wetlands Handbook. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken: 440–463.

  30. Lacey, L. A., 2007. Bacillus thuringiensis serovariety israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus for mosquito control. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 23: 133–164.

  31. Lardeux, F. J. R., 1992. Biological control of Culicidae with the copepod Mesocyclops aspericornis and larvivorous fish (Poeciliidae) in a village of French Polynesia. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 6: 9–15.

  32. Leisnham, P. T., D. P. Slaney, P. J. Lester & P. Weinstein, 2005. Increased larval mosquito densities from modified landuses in the Kapiti Region, New Zealand: vegetation, water quality, and predators as associated environmental factors. EcoHealth 2: 313–322.

  33. Lemasson, J., 1937. L’utilisation de “Gambusia affinis” et “Girardinus guppyi” pour la lutte antimalarienne. Bulletin économique de l’Indo-Chine 40: 328–330.

  34. Levine, J. S. & E. F. MacNichol Jr., 1982. Color vision in fishes. Scientific American 246: 140–149.

  35. Nieman, C. L., A. L. Oppliger, C. C. McElwain & S. M. Gray, 2018. Visual detection thresholds in two trophically distinct fishes are compromised in algal compared to sedimentary turbidity. Conservation Physiology 6: coy044.

  36. Oksanen, J., F. G. Blanchet, M. Friendly, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, D. McGlinn, P. R. Minchin, R. B. O’Hara, G. L. Simpson, P. Solymos, M. H. H. Stevens, E. Szoecs & H. Wagner, 2019. Community Ecology package, R package version 2.5-4 [available on internet at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan]. Accessed May 2019.

  37. Paaijmans, K. P., S. Blanford, A. S. Bell, J. I. Blanford, A. F. Read & M. B. Thomas, 2010. Influence of climate on malaria transmission depends on daily temperature variation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 107: 15135–15139.

  38. Pyke, G. H., 2008. Plague Minnow or mosquito fish? A review of the biology and impacts of introduced Gambusia species. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 39: 171–191.

  39. R Core Team, 2018. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna [available on internet at http://www.R-project.org/]. Accessed May 2019.

  40. Reynolds, J. D., T. J. Webb & L. A. Hawkins, 2005. Life history and ecological correlates of extinction risk in European freshwater fishes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 62: 854–862.

  41. Ruiz-Navarro, A., M. Torralva & F. Oliva-Paterna, 2013. Trophic overlap between cohabiting populations of invasive mosquitofish and an endangered toothcarp at changing salinity conditions. Aquatic Biology 19: 1–11.

  42. Shelton, J. M., M. S. Bird, M. J. Samways & J. A. Day, 2016. Non-native rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) occupy a different trophic niche to native Breede River redfin (Pseudobarbus burchelli) which they replace in South African headwater streams. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 26: 484–496.

  43. Shoup, D. E. & D. H. Wahl, 2009. The effects of turbidity on prey selection by piscivorous largemouth bass. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 138: 1018–1027.

  44. Strauss, R. E., 1979. Reliability estimates for Ivlev’s electivity index, the forage ratio, and a proposed linear index of food selection. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 108: 344–352.

  45. Turner, A. M. & J. C. Trexler, 1997. Sampling aquatic invertebrates from marshes: evaluating the options. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16: 694–709.

  46. Utne-Palm, A. C., 2002. Visual feeding of fish in a turbid environment: physical and behavioural aspects. Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology 35: 111–128.

  47. Verhoeven, J., B. Arheimer, C. Yin & M. Hefting, 2006. Regional and global concerns over wetlands and water quality. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21: 96–103.

  48. Walton, W. E., J. A. Henke & A. M. Why, 2012. Gambusia affinis (Baird & Girard) and Gambusia holbrooki Girard (mosquitofish). In Francis, R. A. (ed.), A Handbook of Global Freshwater Invasive Species. Easthscan, Washington, DC: 261–273.

  49. WHO, 2018. World Malaria Report 2018. World Health Organization, Geneva.

  50. WWF, 2018. In Grooten, M. & R. E. A. Almond (eds), Living Planet Report – 2018: Aiming Higher. WWF, Gland.

  51. Zuur, A. F., E. N. Ieno, N. Walker, A. A. Saveliev & G. M. Smith, 2009. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. Springer, New York.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to F. X. Santaeufemia for providing Aphanius iberus from the Espais Naturals del Delta del Llobregat conservation programme. We also thank all the staff from the aquatic animal facilities at UB: Faculty of Biology. English was reviewed by Laura Massana. This study was funded by the Fundació Barcelona Zoo - Ajuntament de Barcelona. SVA was financed by a Fundació Bosch i Gimpera grant and OCR by an APIF Grant from the University of Barcelona.

Author information

Correspondence to Oriol Cano-Rocabayera.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The experimental procedure was authorized by the Natural Environment and Biodiversity Division at the Catalan Department of Agriculture and Fisheries (Num. DAAM 8289). Fish capture and maintenance were approved by the Committee for an Ethical Use of Experimental Animals at the University of Barcelona (Num. 193/15). Lab experimentation with endangered Aphanius iberus stocks for ex situ conservation purposes was compensated by returning the experimental individuals and the newborn hatchlings born in the lab to wildlife.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Handling editor: Katya E. Kovalenko

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 65 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cano-Rocabayera, O., Vargas-Amengual, S., Aranda, C. et al. Mosquito larvae consumption in turbid waters: the role of the type of turbidity and the larval stage in native and invasive fish. Hydrobiologia 847, 1371–1381 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-020-04195-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Aphanius
  • Gambusia
  • Pest control
  • Species interactions
  • Threatened fish
  • Water turbidity