Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 837, Issue 1, pp 15–30 | Cite as

Aquatic insect diversity in streams across a rural–urban land-use discontinuum

  • Matthew J. LundquistEmail author
  • Weixing Zhu
Primary Research Paper

Abstract

Urbanization negatively impacts the diversity of aquatic insect assemblages in headwater streams and can lead to the homogenization of insect communities at the regional level. However, less is known about the impact of urbanization on insects in headwater streams within smaller cities that have significant upstream portions outside of urban land use. We collected insects monthly from April to September in 2014 and 2015 from five streams that flowed from rural upstream through urban downstream land use, plus two rural reference streams, in Greater Binghamton, New York, in the northeast USA. While urbanization was associated with lower insect taxonomic richness (\(\bar{\alpha }\)) and elevated stream water conductivity, the regional diversity (γ) was similar among urban and rural land use. This corresponded to higher dissimilarity among urban sites (β) than among rural sites. To our knowledge, this is the first report of higher urban stream insect community β-diversity. Our results suggest that urbanization in this medium-sized city negatively impacts stream insect richness, but the change of community assemblages is not homogenous across the urban landscape. Connectivity between upstream rural sites and downstream urban sites may provide some relief from the impacts of urbanization in smaller cities.

Keywords

Urbanization Aquatic insects Headwater streams Biodiversity Specific conductance Beta diversity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the support from the Center for Watershed Studies (CIWS) and the Sustainable Communities Transdisciplinary Areas of Excellence (TAE) of Binghamton University, State University of New York. Special thanks to Drs. Yun Tao and Anthony Fiumera for their statistical consultation. We would also like to thank the reviewers for their thoughtful and constructive inputs which greatly improved this paper.

References

  1. Baselga, A. & C. D. L. Orme, 2012. betapart: an R package for the study of beta diversity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3: 808–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baselga, A., D. Orme, S. Villeger, J. D. Bortoli, F. Leprieur, M. Logez & R. Henriques-Silva, 2018. betapart: partitioning beta diversity into turnover and nestedness components [available on internet at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=betapart]. Accessed 24 Feb 2019.
  3. Bates, D., M. Maechler, B. Bolker, S. Walker, R. H. B. Christensen, H. Singmann, B. Dai, G. Grothendieck, & P. Green, 2017. lme4: linear mixed-effects models using “Eigen” and S4 [available on internet at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html]. Accessed 3 June 2017.
  4. Beavan, L., J. Sadler & C. Pinder, 2001. The invertebrate fauna of a physically modified urban river. Hydrobiologia 445: 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernhardt, E. S., L. E. Band, C. J. Walsh & P. E. Berke, 2008. Understanding, managing, and minimizing urban impacts on surface water nitrogen loading. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1134: 61–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Blakely, T. J., J. S. Harding, A. R. Mcintosh & M. J. Winterbourn, 2006. Barriers to the recovery of aquatic insect communities in urban streams. Freshwater Biology 51: 1634–1645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blasius, B. J. & R. W. Merritt, 2002. Field and laboratory investigations on the effects of road salt (NaCl) on stream macroinvertebrate communities. Environmental Pollution 120: 219–231.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, B. L., 2003. Spatial heterogeneity reduces temporal variability in stream insect communities. Ecology Letters 6: 316–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burdon, F. J., M. Reyes, A. C. Alder, A. Joss, C. Ort, K. Räsänen, J. Jokela, R. I. L. Eggen & C. Stamm, 2016. Environmental context and magnitude of disturbance influence trait-mediated community responses to wastewater in streams. Ecology and Evolution 6: 3923–3939.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Burdon, F. J., N. A. Munz, M. Reyes, A. Focks, A. Joss, K. Räsänen, F. Altermatt, R. I. L. Eggen & C. Stamm, 2019. Agriculture versus wastewater pollution as drivers of macroinvertebrate community structure in streams. Science of The Total Environment 659: 1256–1265.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cañedo-Argüelles, M., M. Bundschuh, C. Gutiérrez-Cánovas, B. J. Kefford, N. Prat, R. Trobajo & R. B. Schäfer, 2014. Effects of repeated salt pulses on ecosystem structure and functions in a stream mesocosm. Science of the Total Environment 476–477: 634–642.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chaput-Bardy, A., C. Lemaire, D. Picard & J. Secondi, 2008. In-stream and overland dispersal across a river network influences gene flow in a freshwater insect, Calopteryx splendens. Molecular Ecology 17: 3496–3505.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarke, A., R. M. Nally, N. R. Bond & P. S. Lake, 2010. Biodiversity research: conserving macroinvertebrate diversity in headwater streams: the importance of knowing the relative contributions of α and β diversity. Diversity and Distributions 16: 725–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coles, J. F., T. F. Cuffney, G. McMahon & C. J. Rosiu, 2010. Judging a Brook by its cover: the relation between ecological condition of a stream and urban land cover in New England. Northeastern Naturalist 17: 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooper, C. A., P. M. Mayer & B. R. Faulkner, 2014. Effects of road salts on groundwater and surface water dynamics of sodium and chloride in an urban restored stream. Biogeochemistry 121: 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Costa, S. S. & A. S. Melo, 2008. Beta diversity in stream macroinvertebrate assemblages: among-site and among-microhabitat components. Hydrobiologia 598: 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cuffney, T. F., R. A. Brightbill, J. T. May & I. R. Waite, 2010. Responses of benthic macroinvertebrates to environmental changes associated with urbanization in nine metropolitan areas. Ecological Applications 20: 1384–1401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cummins, K. W., 1973. Trophic relations of aquatic insects. Annual Review of Entomology 18: 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cunningham, M. A., E. Snyder, D. Yonkin, M. Ross & T. Elsen, 2008. Accumulation of deicing salts in soils in an urban environment. Urban Ecosystems 11: 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Daniel, M. H. B., A. A. Montebelo, M. C. Bernardes, J. P. H. B. Ometto, P. B. de Camargo, A. V. Krusche, M. V. Ballester, R. L. Victoria & L. A. Martinelli, 2002. Effects of urban sewage on dissolved oxygen, dissolved inorganic and organic carbon, and electrical conductivity of small streams along a gradient of urbanization in the Piracicaba River Basin. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 136: 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Didham, R. K., T. J. Blakely, R. M. Ewers, T. R. Hitchings, J. B. Ward & M. J. Winterbourn, 2012. Horizontal and vertical structuring in the dispersal of adult aquatic insects in a fragmented landscape. Fundamental and Applied Limnology/Archiv für Hydrobiologie 180: 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fitzgerald, E. P., W. B. Bowden, S. P. Parker & M. L. Kline, 2012. Urban impacts on streams are scale-dependent with nonlinear influences on their physical and biotic recovery in Vermont, United States. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 48: 679–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grimm, N. B., S. H. Faeth, N. E. Golubiewski, C. L. Redman, J. Wu, X. Bai & J. M. Briggs, 2008. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319: 756–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Groffman, P. M., N. L. Law, K. T. Belt, L. E. Band & G. T. Fisher, 2004. Nitrogen fluxes and retention in urban watershed ecosystems. Ecosystems 7: 393–403.Google Scholar
  25. Groffman, P. M., J. Cavender-Bares, N. D. Bettez, J. M. Grove, S. J. Hall, J. B. Heffernan, S. E. Hobbie, K. L. Larson, J. L. Morse, C. Neill, K. Nelson, J. O’Neil-Dunne, L. Ogden, D. E. Pataki, C. Polsky, R. R. Chowdhury & M. K. Steele, 2014. Ecological homogenization of urban USA. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 12: 74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Halstead, J. A., S. Kliman, C. W. Berheide, A. Chaucer & A. Cock-Esteb, 2014. Urban stream syndrome in a small, lightly developed watershed: a statistical analysis of water chemistry parameters, land use patterns, and natural sources. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 186: 3391–3414.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Heino, J. & H. Mykrä, 2008. Control of stream insect assemblages: roles of spatial configuration and local environmental factors. Ecological Entomology 33: 614–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heino, J., A. S. Melo, T. Siqueira, J. Soininen, S. Valanko & L. M. Bini, 2015. Metacommunity organisation, spatial extent and dispersal in aquatic systems: patterns, processes and prospects. Freshwater Biology 60: 845–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holm, S., 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6: 65–70.Google Scholar
  30. Homer, C., J. Dewitz, L. Yang, S. Jin, P. Danielson, G. Xian, J. Coulston, N. Herold, J. Wickham & K. Megown, 2015. Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the Conterminous United States – representing a decade of land cover change information. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 81: 345–354.Google Scholar
  31. Hosen, J. D., C. M. Febria, B. C. Crump & M. A. Palmer, 2017. Watershed urbanization linked to differences in stream bacterial community composition. Frontiers in Microbiology 8 [available on internet at https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01452/full]. Accessed 8 Aug 2018.
  32. Howarth, R. W., A. Sharpley & D. Walker, 2002. Sources of nutrient pollution to coastal waters in the United States: implications for achieving coastal water quality goals. Estuaries 25: 656–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jost, L., 2007. Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology 88: 2427–2439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kaushal, S. S. & K. T. Belt, 2012. The urban watershed continuum: evolving spatial and temporal dimensions. Urban Ecosystems 15: 409–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kindt, R., 2017. BiodiversityR: package for community ecology and suitability analysis [available on internet at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BiodiversityR/index.html]. Accessed 3 June 2017.
  36. King, R. S., M. E. Baker, D. F. Whigham, D. E. Weller, T. E. Jordan, P. F. Kazyak & M. K. Hurd, 2005. Spatial considerations for linking watershed land cover to ecological indicators in streams. Ecological Applications 15: 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Koryak, M., L. J. Stafford, R. J. Reilly & P. M. Magnuson, 2001. Highway deicing salt runoff events and major ion concentrations along a small urban stream. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 16: 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lefcheck, J., 2016. piecewiseSEM: piecewise structural equation modeling [available on internet at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/piecewiseSEM/index.html]. Accessed 3 June 2017.
  39. Li, J. L., S. L. Johnson & J. Banks Sobota, 2011. Three responses to small changes in stream temperature by autumn-emerging aquatic insects. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 30: 474–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Málnás, K., L. Polyák, É. Prill, R. Hegedüs, G. Kriska, G. Dévai, G. Horváth & S. Lengyel, 2011. Bridges as optical barriers and population disruptors for the mayfly Palingenia longicauda: an overlooked threat to freshwater biodiversity? Journal of Insect Conservation 15: 823–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McKinney, M. L., 2006. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biological Conservation 127: 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Merritt, R. W., K. W. Cummins & M. B. Berg, 2008. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America. Kendall Hunt Publishing, Dubuque.Google Scholar
  43. Miller, S., 2016. expandFunctions: feature matrix builder [available on internet at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/expandFunctions/index.html]. Accessed 3 June 2017.
  44. Moore, A. A. & M. A. Palmer, 2005. Invertebrate biodiversity in agricultural and urban headwater streams: implications for conservation and management. Ecological Applications 15: 1169–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nelson, K. C. & M. A. Palmer, 2007. Stream temperature surges under urbanization and climate change: data, models, and responses. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43: 440–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. New York State Department of Conservation (NYS DEC), 2016. Standard Operating Procedure: Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State. Division of Water, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany [available on internet at http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/water_pdf/sbusop2016.pdf]. Accessed 5 April 2017.
  47. Nichols, J., J. A. Hubbart & B. C. Poulton, 2016. Using macroinvertebrate assemblages and multiple stressors to infer urban stream system condition: a case study in the central US. Urban Ecosystems 19: 679–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Oksanen, J., F. G. Blanchet, M. Friendly, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, D. McGlinn, P. R. Minchin, R. B. O’Hara, G. L. Simpson, P. Solymos, M. H. H. Stevens, E. Szoecs, & H. Wagner, 2017. vegan: community ecology package [available on internet at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html]. Accessed 3 June 2017.
  49. Olden, J. D. & N. L. Poff, 2003. Toward a mechanistic understanding and prediction of biotic homogenization. The American Naturalist 162: 442–460.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Olden, J. D. & N. L. Poff, 2004. Ecological processes driving biotic homogenization: testing a mechanistic model using fish faunas. Ecology 85: 1867–1875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Olson, J. R. & C. P. Hawkins, 2017. Effects of total dissolved solids on growth and mortality predict distributions of stream macroinvertebrates. Freshwater Biology 62: 779–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Paul, M. J. & J. L. Meyer, 2001. Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32: 333–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pickett, S. T. A. & W. Zhou, 2015. Global urbanization as a shifting context for applying ecological science toward the sustainable city. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability 1: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Quantum GIS Development Team, 2016. Quantum GIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project [available on internet at https://www.qgis.org]. Accessed 1 Aug 2017.
  55. R Core Team, 2016. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna [available on internet at https://www.R-project.org/]. Accessed 3 June 2017.
  56. Robertson, A., G. Dineen, R. Baker, B. Hancock & P. Shaw, 2014. Microinvertebrate community colonisation and succession in a new urban river: lessons for river restoration. Fundamental and Applied Limnology/Archiv für Hydrobiologie 185: 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Roy, A. H., A. D. Rosemond, M. J. Paul, D. S. Leigh & J. B. Wallace, 2003. Stream macroinvertebrate response to catchment urbanisation (Georgia, U.S.A.). Freshwater Biology 48: 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shoffner, D. & D. Royall, 2008. Hydraulic habitat composition and diversity in rural and urban stream reaches of the North Carolina Piedmont (USA). River Research and Applications 24: 1082–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smith, R. F., L. C. Alexander & W. O. Lamp, 2009. Dispersal by terrestrial stages of stream insects in urban watersheds: a synthesis of current knowledge. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 28: 1022–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith, R. F., P. D. Venugopal, M. E. Baker & W. O. Lamp, 2015. Habitat filtering and adult dispersal determine the taxonomic composition of stream insects in an urbanizing landscape. Freshwater Biology 60: 1740–1754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Somers, K. A., E. S. Bernhardt, J. B. Grace, B. A. Hassett, E. B. Sudduth, S. Wang & D. L. Urban, 2013. Streams in the urban heat island: spatial and temporal variability in temperature. Freshwater Science 32: 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sundermann, A., S. Stoll & P. Haase, 2011. River restoration success depends on the species pool of the immediate surroundings. Ecological Applications 21: 1962–1971.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Tonkin, J. D., S. Stoll, A. Sundermann & P. Haase, 2014. Dispersal distance and the pool of taxa, but not barriers, determine the colonisation of restored river reaches by benthic invertebrates. Freshwater Biology 59: 1843–1855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tszydel, M., M. Markowski, J. Majecki, D. Błońska & M. Zieliński, 2015. Assessment of water quality in urban streams based on larvae of Hydropsyche angustipennis (Insecta, Trichoptera). Environmental Science and Pollution Research 22: 14687–14701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. United Nations Population Division, 2014. World urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision. United Nations, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Urban, M. C., D. K. Skelly, D. Burchsted, W. Price & S. Lowry, 2006. Stream communities across a rural–urban landscape gradient. Diversity and Distributions 12: 337–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell & C. E. Cushing, 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37: 130–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Violin, C. R., P. Cada, E. B. Sudduth, B. A. Hassett, D. L. Penrose & E. S. Bernhardt, 2011. Effects of urbanization and urban stream restoration on the physical and biological structure of stream ecosystems. Ecological Applications 21: 1932–1949.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Walsh, C. J., A. H. Roy, P. D. Cottingham, P. M. Groffman & R. P. Morgan, 2005. The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24: 706–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wenger, S. J., A. H. Roy, C. R. Jackson, E. S. Bernhardt, T. L. Carter, S. Filoso, C. A. Gibson, W. C. Hession, S. S. Kaushal, E. Martí, J. L. Meyer, M. A. Palmer, M. J. Paul, A. H. Purcell, A. Ramírez, A. D. Rosemond, K. A. Schofield, E. B. Sudduth & C. J. Walsh, 2009. Twenty-six key research questions in urban stream ecology: an assessment of the state of the science. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 28: 1080–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Natural SciencesMarymount Manhattan CollegeNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesBinghamton UniversityBinghamtonUSA
  3. 3.Center for Integrated Watershed StudiesBinghamton UniversityBinghamtonUSA

Personalised recommendations