Advertisement

Mixotrophic phytoplankton dynamics in a shallow Mediterranean water body: how to make a virtue out of necessity

  • Luigi Naselli-Flores
  • Rossella Barone
PHYTOPLANKTON & BIOTIC INTERACTIONS
  • 62 Downloads

Abstract

Mixotrophy is a combination of photosynthesis and direct access to organic carbon sources, mainly through osmotrophy or phagotrophy. This strategy is adopted by several, phylogenetically distinct, phytoplankton groups and is commonly occurring in marine, brackish and freshwater ecosystems. Traditionally, it has been put in relation to both scarcity of inorganic nutrients and poor light conditions. However, we observed blooms of the mixotrophic, toxic haptophyte Prymnesium parvum in different periods of the year and under variable resources availability. The analysis of a 6.5-year data set of phytoplankton weekly records from a Sicilian shallow lake (Biviere di Gela, south-eastern Sicily) allowed us to hypothesise that a depleted condition as regards inorganic nutrients is not the main fuel to the growth of P. parvum, neither this is due to light limitation. The results achieved show that an increased availability in suitable preys can stimulate the growth of this phagotrophic photoautotroph. Contemporarily, it was not found any clear environmental patterns to explain species dominance and growth patterns as related to inorganic nutrient availability. Moreover, it is shown that these organisms tend to monopolise resources when these become available irrespective of seasons, and under variable conditions as regards inorganic nutrient availability.

Keywords

Prymnesium parvum Phagotrophy BOD5 Nutrient availability Biological interactions 

Supplementary material

10750_2018_3507_MOESM1_ESM.docx (89 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 88 kb)

References

  1. APAT, 2003. Metodi Analitici per le Acque. Manuali e Linee Guida 29/2003. Agenzia per la Protezione dell’Ambiente e per i Servizi Tecnici, Roma. ISBN 88-448-0083-7 [available on internet at http://www.isprambiente.gov.it/it/pubblicazioni/manuali-e-linee-guida/metodi-analitici-per-le-acque].
  2. Arenovski, A. L., E. L. Lim & D. A. Caron, 1995. Mixotrophic nanoplankton in oligotrophic surface waters of the Sargasso Sea may employ phagotrophy to obtain major nutrients. Journal of Plankton Research 17: 801–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azam, F., T. Fenchel, J. G. Field, J. S. Gray, L. A. Meyer-Reil & F. Thingstad, 1983. The ecological role of water-column microbes in the sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 10: 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barone, R. & L. Naselli-Flores, 2003. Distribution and seasonal dynamics of Cryptomonads in Sicilian water bodies. Hydrobiologia 502: 325–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barone, R., G. Castelli & L. Naselli-Flores, 2010. Red sky at night cyanobacteria delight: the role of climate in structuring phytoplankton assemblage in a shallow, Mediterranean lake (Biviere di Gela, southeastern Sicily). Hydrobiologia 639: 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burkholder, J. M., P. M. Glibert & H. M. Skelton, 2008. Mixotrophy, a major mode of nutrition for harmful algal species in eutrophic waters. Harmful Algae 8: 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caron, D. A., R. W. Sanders, E. L. Lim, C. Marrasé, L. A. Amaral, S. Whitney, R. B. Aoki & K. G. Porter, 1993. Light-dependent phagotrophy in the freshwater mixotrophic crysophyte Dinobryon cilindricum. Microbial Ecology 25: 93–111.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Croft, M. T., M. J. Warren & A. G. Smith, 2006. Algae need their vitamins. Eukaryotic Cell 5: 1175–1183.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Eikrem, W., L. K. Medlin, J. Henderiks, S. Rokitta, B. Rost, I. Probert, J. Throndsen & B. Edvardsen, 2017. Haptophyta. In Archibald, J. M., A. G. B. Simpson & C. H. Slamovits (eds), Handbook of the Protists, 2nd ed. Springer, Cham: 893–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eiler, A., 2006. Evidence for the ubiquity of mixotrophic bacteria in the upper ocean: implications and consequences. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72: 7431–7437.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Ghyoot, C., K. J. Flynn, A. Mitra, C. Lancelot & N. Gypens, 2017. Modeling plankton mixotrophy: a mechanistic model consistent with the Shuter-type biochemical approach. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00078.Google Scholar
  12. Granéli, E. & N. Johansson, 2003. Increase in the production of allelopathic substances by Prymnesium parvum cells grown under N- or P-deficient conditions. Harmful Algae 2: 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Händeler, K., Y. P. Grzymbowski, P. J. Krug & H. Wägele, 2009. Functional chloroplasts in metazoan cells – a unique evolutionary strategy in animal life. Frontiers in Zoology.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-6-28.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Hillebrand, H., C.-D. Dûrselen, D. Kirschtel, U. Pollingher & T. Zohary, 1999. Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. Journal of Phycology 35: 403–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoef-Hemden, K. & J. M. Archibald, 2017. Cryptophyta (Cryptomonads). In Archibald, J. M., A. G. B. Simpson & C. H. Slamovits (eds), Handbook of the Protists, 2nd ed. Springer, Cham: 851–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jeppesen, E., S. Brucet, L. Naselli-Flores, E. Papastergiadou, K. Stefanidis, T. Nõges, P. Nõges, J. L. Attayde, T. Zohary, J. Coppens, T. Bucak, R. F. Menezes, F. R. S. Freitas, M. Kernan, M. Søndergaard & M. Beklioğlu, 2015. Ecological impacts of global warming and water abstraction on lakes and reservoirs due to changes in water level and related changes in salinity. Hydrobiologia 750: 201–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, M. D., D. J. Beaudoin, A. Laza-Martinez, S. T. Dyhrman, E. Fensin, S. Lin, A. Merculief, S. Nagai, M. Pompeu, O. Setälä & D. K. Stoecker, 2016. The genetic diversity of Mesodinium and associated cryptophytes. Frontiers in Microbiology.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02017.Google Scholar
  18. Jones, H. J. L., 1997. A classification of mixotrophic protists based on their behaviour. Freshwater Biology 37: 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones, R. I., 2000. Mixotrophy in planktonic protists: an overview. Freshwater Biology 45: 219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, H., C. S. Cockell, C. Goodson, N. Price, A. Simpson & B. Thomas, 2009. Experiments on mixotrophic protists and catastrophic darkness. Astrobiology 9: 563–571.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kagalou, I., G. Tsimarakis & E. Bezirtzoglou, 2002. Inter-relationships between bacteriological and chemical variations in Lake Pamvotis – Greece. Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease 14: 37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keeling, P. J., 2013. The number, speed, and impact of plastid endosymbioses in eukaryotic evolution. Annual Review of Plant Biology 64: 583–607.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Leander, B. S., G. Lax, A. Karnkowska & A. G. B. Simpson, 2017. Euglenida. In Archibald, J. M., A. G. B. Simpson & C. H. Slamovits (eds), Handbook of the Protists, 2nd ed. Springer, Cham: 1047–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Litchman, E. & C. A. Klausmeier, 2008. Trait-based community ecology of phytoplankton. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 39: 615–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mitra, A., K. J. Flynn, U. Tillmann, J. A. Raven, D. Caron, D. K. Stoecker, F. Not, P. J. Hansen, G. Hallegraeff, R. Sanders, S. Wilken, G. McManus, M. Johnson, P. Pitta, S. Våge, T. Berge, A. Calbet, F. Thingstad, H. J. Jeong, J.-A. Burkholder, P. M. Glibert, E. Granéli & V. Lundgren, 2016. Defining planktonic protist functional groups on mechanisms for energy and nutrient acquisition: incorporation of diverse mixotrophic strategies. Protists 167: 106–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Naselli-Flores, L., 1999. Limnological aspects of Sicilian reservoirs: a comparative ecosystemic approach. In Tundisi, J. G. & M. Straškraba (eds), Theoretical Reservoir Ecology and its Applications. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden: 283–311.Google Scholar
  27. Naselli-Flores, L., 2000. Phytoplankton assemblages in twenty-one Sicilian reservoirs: relationships between species composition and environmental factors. Hydrobiologia 424: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Naselli-Flores, L., 2014. Morphological analysis of phytoplankton as a tool to assess ecological state of aquatic ecosystems: the case of Lake Arancio, Sicily, Italy. Inland Waters 4: 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Naselli-Flores, L. & R. Barone, 1994. Relationship between trophic state and plankton community structure in 21 Sicilian dam reservoirs. Hydrobiologia 275(276): 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Naselli-Flores, L. & R. Barone, 2011. Fight on plankton! Or, phytoplankton shape and size as adaptive tools to get ahead in the struggle for life. Cryptogamie Algologie 32: 157–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Naselli-Flores, L. & R. Barone, 2012. Phytoplankton dynamics in permanent and temporary Mediterranean waters: is the game hard to play because of hydrological disturbance? Hydrobiologia 698: 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Naselli-Flores, L., R. Termine & R. Barone, 2016. Phytoplankton colonization patterns. Is species richness depending on distance among freshwaters or on their connectivity? Hydrobiologia 764: 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Obrador, B. & J. L. Pretus, 2008. Light regime and components of turbidity in a Mediterranean coastal lagoon. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 77: 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Olutiola, P. O., K. O. Awojobi, O. Oyedeji, A. D. V. Ayansina & O. O. Cole, 2010. Relationship between bacterial density and chemical composition of a tropical sewage oxidation pond. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 4: 595–602.Google Scholar
  35. Pållson, C. & W. Granéli, 2004. Nutrient limitation of autotrophic and mixotrophic phytoplankton in a temperate and tropical humic lake gradient. Journal of Plankton Research 26: 1005–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Raven, J. A., 1997. Phagotrophy in phototrophs. Limnology and Oceanography 42: 198–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rengefors, K., A. Kremp, T. B. H. Reusch & M. Wood, 2017. Genetic diversity and evolution in eukaryotic phytoplankton: revelations from population genetic studies. Journal of Plankton Research 39: 165–179.Google Scholar
  38. Reynolds, C. S., 2006. The Ecology of Phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reynolds, C. S., V. L. Huszar, C. Kruk, L. Naselli-Flores & S. Melo, 2002. Towards a functional classification of the freshwater phytoplankton. Journal of Plankton Research 24: 417–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roelke, D. L., A. Barkoh, B. W. Brooks, J. P. Grover, K. D. Hambright, J. W. LaClaire II, P. D. R. Moeller & R. Patino, 2016. A chronicle of a killer alga in the west: ecology, assessment, and management of Prymnesium parvum blooms. Hydrobiologia 764: 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Saldarriaga, J. F. & F. J. R. M. Taylor, 2017. Dinoflagellata. In Archibald, J. M., A. G. B. Simpson & C. H. Slamovits (eds), Handbook of the Protists, 2nd ed. Springer, Cham: 625–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Simpson, A. G. B., C. H. Slamovits & J. M. Archibald, 2017. Protist diversity and eukaryote phylogeny. In Archibald, J. M., A. G. B. Simpson & C. H. Slamovits (eds), Handbook of the Protists, 2nd ed. Springer, Cham: 1–21.Google Scholar
  43. Stoecker, D. K., 1998. Conceptual models of mixotrophy in planktonic protists and some ecological and evolutionary implications. European Journal of Protistology 34: 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tanifuji, G. & N. T. Onodera, 2017. Cryptomonads: a model organism sheds light on the evolutionary history of genome reorganization in secondary endosymbiosis. Advances in Botanical Research 84: 263–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tartari, G. A. & R. Mosello, 1997. Metodologie analitiche e controlli di qualità nel laboratorio chimico dell’Istituto Italiano di Idrobiologia. Documenta dell’Istituto Italiano di Idrobiologia 60: 1–160.Google Scholar
  46. Tranvik, L. J., K. G. Porter & J. M. Sieburth, 1989. Occurrence of bacterivory in Cryptomonas, a common fresh-water phytoplankter. Oecologia 78: 473–476.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Yafremava, L., M. Wielgos, S. Thomas, A. Nasir, M. Wang, J. E. Mitthenthal & G. Caetano-Anollés, 2013. A general framework of persistence strategies for biological systems helps explain domains of life. Frontiers in Genetics.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00016.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Zimmer, C., 2009. On the origin of eukaryotes. Science 325: 666–668.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF)University of PalermoPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations