Dietary tracers and stomach contents reveal pronounced alimentary flexibility in the freshwater mullet (Myxus capensis, Mugilidae) concomitant with ontogenetic shifts in habitat use and seasonal food availability
We investigated ontogenetic and seasonal variations in the diet of the freshwater mullet (Myxus capensis) across a river–estuary interface using dietary tracer (stable isotopes and fatty acids) and stomach content analyses. Two hypotheses were tested: (A) the freshwater mullet diet shifts as individuals grow and migrate from the estuary to the river, and (B) the dominant food resources utilized by freshwater mullet vary through time, mainly as a function of the seasonal changes in the availability of preferred food items in each habitat. Both hypotheses were supported, as our results indicated broad dietary flexibility by M. capensis, with utilized food items ranging from benthic microalgae to insects depending on habitat and seasonal patterns in availability of resources. Given the unexpected importance of invertebrate-derived prey, including some of terrestrial origin (i.e. aerial or semi-aquatic insects), during the freshwater phase of the M. capensis life cycle, we also emphasize a need for a re-assessment of the trophic designation of this species (previously designated as a strict detritivore).
KeywordsFish trophic ecology Insects Allochthony Detritivory Ontogeny Riparian zone
This study was funded by the Water Research Commission (WRC) of South Africa, the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa, Rhodes University’s Sandisa Imbewu Initiative, and the South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity (SAIAB). This project received ethics clearance from Rhodes University (RU Ethics Clearance ZOOL-02-2012) and the South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity (SAIAB Ethics Clearance 2012/04). We thank Paul Cowley, Mandla Magoro, Tatenda Dalu, Leandro Bergamino and Bernadette Hubbart for their assistance with field and/or laboratory work.
- Babler, A. L., A. Pilati & M. J. Vanni, 2010. Terrestrial support of detritivorous fish populations decreases with watershed size. Ecosphere 2: 1–23.Google Scholar
- Cole, J. J., S. R. Carpenter, J. Kitchell, M. L. Pace, C. T. Solomon & B. Weidel, 2011. Strong evidence for terrestrial support of zooplankton in small lakes based on stable isotopes of carbon, nitrogen, and hydrogen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 1975–1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Crosetti, D. & S. J. M. Blaber (eds), 2016. Biology, Ecology and Culture of Grey Mullets (Mugilidae). CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
- Froese, R. & D. Pauly, 2016. Fishbase. World Wide Web electronic publication [available on internet at www.fishbase.org]. Accessed July 2016
- Izquierdo, M., 2005. Essential fatty acid requirements in Mediterranean fish species. Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes 63: 91–102.Google Scholar
- Marais, J. F. K., 1980. Aspects of food intake, food selection, and alimentary canal morphology of Mugil cephalus (Linnaeus, 1958), Liza tricuspidens (Smith, 1935), L. richardsoni (Smith, 1846), and L. dumerili (Steindachner, 1869). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 44: 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moyo, S., 2016. Aquatic-terrestrial linkages via riverine invertebrates in a South African catchment. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Zoology and Entomology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown. Available at Rhodes University eRepository [ available on internet at http://contentpro.seals.ac.za/iii/cpro/]. Accessed on March 18th 2017.
- Nakano, S., H. Miyasaka & N. Kuhara, 1999. Terrestrial-aquatic linkages: riparian arthropod inputs alter trophic cascades in a stream food web. Ecology 80: 2435–2441.Google Scholar
- Parnell, A., D. L. Phillips, S. Bearshop, B. X. Semmens, E. J. Ward, J. W. Moore, A. L. Jackson, J. Grey, D. J. Kelly & R. Inger, 2013. Bayesian stable isotope mixing models. Environmetrics 24: 387–399.Google Scholar
- Parrish, C. C., T. A. Abrajano, S. M. Budge, R. J. Helleur, E. D. Hudson, K. Pulchan & C. Ramos, 2000. Lipid and phenolic biomarkers in marine ecosystems: analysis and interpretation. In Wangersky, P. (ed.), The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry Part D Marine Chemistry, Chapter 8, Vol. 5. Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 193–223.Google Scholar
- Stock, B.C. & B.X. Semmens, 2013. MixSIAR GUI User Manual. Version 3.1.Google Scholar
- Van der Bank, M. G., A. C. Utne-Palme, K. Pittman, A. K. Sweetman, N. B. Richoux, V. Brüchert & M. J. Gibbons, 2011. Dietary success of a ‘new’ key fish in an overfished ecosystem: evidence from fatty acid and stable isotope signatures. Marine Ecology Progress Series 428: 219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang, L., J. Lyons, P. Rasmussen, P. Seelbach, T. Simon, M. Wiley, P. Kanehl, E. Baker, S. Niemela & P. W. Stewart, 2003. Watershed, reach, and riparian influences on stream fish assemblages in the Northern Lakes and Forest Ecoregion, USA. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60: 491–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Whitfield, A. K., 1998. Biology and Ecology of Fishes in southern African estuaries. JLB Institute of Ichthyology, South Africa.Google Scholar
- Zar, J. H., 1999. Biostatistical Analysis, 4th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar