, Volume 797, Issue 1, pp 351–370 | Cite as

Cryptic diversity in the Indian clade of the catfish family Pangasiidae resolved by the description of a new species

  • Arvind K. Dwivedi
  • Braj Kishor Gupta
  • Rajeev K. Singh
  • Vindhya Mohindra
  • Suresh Chandra
  • Suresh Easawarn
  • Joykrushna Jena
  • Kuldeep K. LalEmail author
Primary Research Paper


Among 22 species of the genus Pangasius, distributed in Southeast and South Asia, only one species, Pangasius pangasius, is known to exist in South Asia. Phylogenetic analysis based upon COI and Cytb sequences suggested that the P. pangasius species clade consists of two subclades. Based upon the genetic and the following morphological evidence, we conclude that these DNA sequence based sister subclades represent two distinct species, P. pangasius and an undescribed species from river Krishna, named as P. silasi. Morphologically, P. silasi is differentiated from its congener P. pangasius by a combination of characters, such as vomero-palatal teeth confluent as an uninterrupted curved band (vs two lunate vomero-palatal teeth patches on each side with a wide gap in the center) and vertebral count of 48 (vs 44). For several morphological characters, P. silasi is also distinct from P. myanmar, which is reported from Myanmar and has overlapping distribution with P. pangasius. Finally, the vomero-palatine dentition in P. silasi is distinct from the dentition structures reported for all the other Pangasius species. The biogeographical significance of finding this new species, P. silasi, in a river of the Indian peninsula is also discussed in this report.


Pangasius River Krishna DNA sequences Molecular phylogeny Morphology Biogeography 



The authors are grateful to the consistent support of the Director, NBFGR, Lucknow during this work. The authors are thankful to the NAIP-GEF, New Delhi, India, for providing financial assistance under the Project Code: 30036, GEF funded, Harmonizing Biodiversity Conservation and Agricultural Intensification through Integration of Plant, Animal and Fish Genetic Resources for Livelihood Security in Fragile Ecosystem. The authors acknowledge Dr. K.P. Bineesh, Scientist NBFGR for the useful suggestions and Mr. K. N. George, CMFRI for the line drawings.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The manuscript is submitted after forwarding through prescribed procedures of the institute with the approval of competent authority.

Supplementary material

10750_2017_3198_MOESM1_ESM.docx (11.1 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 11360 kb)


  1. Biosystems, Applied, 2009. DNA Sequencing by Capillary Electrophoresis Chemistry Guide, 2nd ed. Applied Biosystems, New York: 296p.Google Scholar
  2. Briggs, J. C., 2003. The Biogeographic and tectonic history of India. Journal of Biogeography 30: 381–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baharuddin, H., M. Rizman-Idid, S. Muniandy & M. Zakaria-Ismail, 2014. The Occurrence of Pangasius polyuranodon Bleeker, 1852 (Teleostei: Pangasiidae) in Peninsular Malaysia with remarks on the comparative morphology with Pseudolais micronemus (Bleeker, 1847). Sains Malaysiana 43(11): 1707–1714.Google Scholar
  4. Chakrabarty, P., 2010. The transitioning state of systematic ichthyology. Copeia 3: 513–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chakrabarty, P., M. Warren, L. M. Page & C. C. Baldwin, 2013. GenSeq: an updated nomenclature and ranking for genetic sequences of type and non-type sources. ZooKeys 346: 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. David, A., 1962. Brief taxonomic account of the Gangetic Pangasius pangasius Hamilton with a description of a new subspecies from the Godavari. Proceeding of Indian Academy of Sciences 56: 136–156.Google Scholar
  7. Day F, 1876. The fishes of India; being a natural history of the fishes known to inhabit the seas and fresh waters of India, Burma and Ceylon Jagmander Book Agency New Delhi ISBN-81-86095-00-4.Google Scholar
  8. Eschmeyer WN, 2014. (ed) Catalog of Fishes: Genera Species References. Electronic version (This version was edited by Bill Eschmeyer). Accessed 07 December 2014 [available on internet at http://www.researchcalacademyorg/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmainasp].
  9. Ferraris, C. J., 2007. Checklist of catfishes recent and fossil Osteichthys: Siluriformes and catalogue of siluriform primary types. Zootaxa 1418: 1–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamilton, F. B., 1822. An Account of the Fishes Found in the River Ganges and its Branches. Archibald Constable and Company, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hora, S. L., 1951. Some observations on the Paleogeography of the Garo-Rajmahal Gap as evidenced by the distribution of Malayan fauna and flora to peninsular India. Proceedings of National Institute of Sciences, India 17: 437–444.Google Scholar
  12. Hora, S. L., 1939. The game fishes of India-V. The Pangas catfish, Pangasius pangasius (Hamilton). Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 40(3): 355–366.Google Scholar
  13. Huelsenbeck, J. P. & F. Ronquist, 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jayaram, K. C., 2006. Catfishes of India. Narendra Publishing House, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  15. Jayaram, K. C., 2010. The Freshwater Fishes of the Indian Region, 2nd ed. Narendra Publishing House, Delhi: 616.Google Scholar
  16. Jhingran, V. G., 1975. Fish and Fisheries of India. Hindustan Publishing Corporation, New Delhi: 954.Google Scholar
  17. Karinthanyakit, W. & A. Jondeung, 2012. Molecular phylogenetic relationships of pangasiid and schilbid catfishes in Thailand. Journal of Fish Biology 80(7): 2549–2570.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Khare, P., V. Mohindra, A. S. Barman, R. K. Singh & K. K. Lal, 2014. Molecular evidence to reconcile taxonomic instability in mahseer species Pisces: Cyprinidae of India. Organism Diversity and Evolution 14(3): 307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kottelat, M., 2013. The fishes of inland waters of Southeast Asia: a catalogue and core bibliography of the fishes known to occur in freshwaters, mangroves and estuaries. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 2013(Suppl. 27): 1–663.Google Scholar
  20. Lakra, W. S., M. S. Verma, M. Goswami, K. K. Lal, V. Mohindra, P. Punia, A. Gopalakrishnan, K. V. Singh, R. D. Ward & P. Hebert, 2011. DNA barcoding Indian marine fishes. Molecular Ecology Resources 11(1): 60–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Menon, A. G. K., 1980. The satpura hypothesis. Proceeding of National Academy of Sciences, India B 46(1): 27–32.Google Scholar
  22. Mohindra, V., R. K. Singh, P. Punia, H. S. Gupta, K. K. Lal, A. Mishra, R. Kumar, R. S. Sah & W. S. Lakra, 2008. Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci in yellowtail catfish, Pangasius pangasius (Hamilton, 1822). Molecular Ecology Resources 8(4): 864–8666.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mohindra, V., R. K. Singh, R. Kumar, R. S. Sah & K. K. Lal, 2015a. Genetic divergence in wild population of endangered yellowtail catfish Pangasius pangasius (Hamilton-Buchanan, 1822) revealed by mtDNA. Mitochondrial DNA 26(2): 182–186.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mohindra, V., R. K. Singh, R. Kumar, R. S. Sah & K. K. Lal, 2015b. Complete mitochondrial genome sequences of two endangered Indian catfish species, Clarias batrachus and Pangasius pangasius. Mitochondrial DNA. 26(5): 678–679.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ng, H. H. & J. J. Dodson, 1999. Morphological and genetic descriptions of a new species of catfish Hemibagrus chrysops from Sarwak East Malaysia with an assessment of phylogenetic relationships Teleostei: Bagridae. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 47: 45–57.Google Scholar
  26. Pouyaud, L., G. G. Teugels, R. Gustiano & M. Legendre, 2000. Contribution to the phylogeny of pangasiid catfishes based on allozymes and mitochondrial DNA. Journal of Fish Biology 56: 1509–1538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pouyaud, L., R. Gustiano & G. G. Teugels, 2004. Contribution to the phylogeny of the Pangasiidae based on mitochondrial 12S rDNA. Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Science 5(2): 45–62.Google Scholar
  28. Ramakrishnaya, N., 1986. Studies on the fishery and biology of Pangasius pangasius (Hamilton) of the Nagarjuna Sagar Reservoir in Andhra Pradesh. Indian Journal Fisheries 333: 320–335.Google Scholar
  29. Roberts, T. R. & C. Vidthayanon, 1991. Systematic revision of the Asian catfish family Pangasiidae, with biological observations and descriptions of three new species. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 143: 97–144.Google Scholar
  30. Saitou, N. & M. Nei, 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4: 406–425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Shrestha, T. K., 2008. Ichthyology of Nepal. A Study of Fishes of the Himalayan Waters. Himalayan Ecosphere, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
  32. Silas, E. G., 1952a. Fishes from the high range of Travancore. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 50: 232–330.Google Scholar
  33. Silas, E. G., 1952b. Further studies on Hora’s Satpura Hypothesis 2 Taxonomic assessment and levels of evolutionary divergences of fishes with the so-called Malayan affinities. Proceeding of National Academy of Sciences, India 18: 423–426.Google Scholar
  34. Srivastava, G. J., 1968. Fishes of Eastern Uttar Pradesh. Vishwavidyalaya Prakashan, Varanasi: 163 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Talwar, P. K. & A. G. Jhingran, 1991. Inland Fishes of India and Adjacent Countries, Vol. 2. A.A Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  36. Tamura, K., J. Dudley, M. Nei & S. Kumar, 2007. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis MEGA software version 40. Molecular Biology and Evolution 248: 1596–1599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thompson, J. D., T. J. Gibson, F. Plewniak, F. Jeanmougin & D. G. Higgens, 1997. The Clustal X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 24: 4876–4882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ward, R. D., T. S. Zemlak, B. H. Innes, P. R. Last & P. D. N. Hebert, 2005. DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360(1462):1847–1857.Google Scholar
  39. Xiao, W., Y. Zhang, & H. Liu, 2001. Molecular systematics of Xenocyprinae (teleostei: cyprinidae): taxonomy, biogeography, and coevolution of a special group restricted in East Asia. Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution 18(2):163–73.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arvind K. Dwivedi
    • 1
  • Braj Kishor Gupta
    • 1
  • Rajeev K. Singh
    • 1
  • Vindhya Mohindra
    • 1
  • Suresh Chandra
    • 1
  • Suresh Easawarn
    • 1
  • Joykrushna Jena
    • 1
  • Kuldeep K. Lal
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources Canal Ring RoadLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations