Hydrobiologia

, Volume 788, Issue 1, pp 33–46 | Cite as

Phylogeny and phylogeography of the roaches, genus Rutilus (Cyprinidae), at the Eastern part of its range as inferred from mtDNA analysis

  • B. A. Levin
  • E. P. Simonov
  • O. A. Ermakov
  • M. A. Levina
  • E. A. Interesova
  • O. M. Kovalchuk
  • Y. A. Malinina
  • N. S. Mamilov
  • N. J. Mustafayev
  • D. V. Pilin
  • I. V. Pozdeev
  • N. I. Prostakov
  • H. R. Roubenyan
  • S. V. Titov
  • D. A. Vekhov
Primary Research Paper

Abstract

The genus Rutilus is a widely distributed lineage of cyprinids and ranges from West Europe to East Siberia. Although matrilineal phylogeny and phylogeography of western species were already studied, roaches from remaining part of the range were not examined. Phylogenetic analysis based on cytochrome b sequences detected the following three major phylogenetic clades: (i) R. frisii, (ii) R. rutilus s. str., and (iii) group of six Ponto–Caspian taxa: R. caspicus, R. heckelii, R. rutilus aralensis, R. rutilus lacustris, R. schelkovnikovi, and R. stoumboudae. Our results suggest that these “species” within Ponto–Caspian clade could be a single species (R. lacustris by priority of description). The Ponto–Caspian clade is most widely distributed among others and covers the freshwaters from the Aegean Sea basin to Laptev Sea tributaries. Both R. rutilus s. str. and Ponto–Caspian clades sympatrically occur in Black Sea and Caspian Sea basins, Azov Sea itself, and even in drainage of White Sea. The vastest zone of contact (approximately 1700 km) was detected in the Volga basin. The spatial pattern of haplotype diversity and the shape of haplotype network argued for multiple refugia in Ponto–Caspian region as well as a rapid post-glacial colonization of Volga River and Siberia.

Keywords

Cyprinidae Phylogeny Phylogeography Rutilus Contact zone Eurasia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to S.S. Alekseyev, A.A. Bolotovskiy, E.A. Borovikova, V.A. Chernyshov, Yu.V. Gerassimov, V.Y. Ilyin, A.P. Kalinin, A.V. Kozhara, M.P. Matwejev, A.E. Minin, D.D. Pavlov, O.A. Polumordvinov, A.A. Prokin, V.B. Salnikov, I.V. Shlyapkin, and I.S. Voroshilova for sharing of their samples. We are also thankful to N.G. Bogutskaya for providing the literature, to M. H. D. Larmuseau for providing of his unpublished cytb sequences to check some localities, and to N. S. Mugue for doing of first sequences in his lab. This study was supported by grant of the Russian Science Foundation, No. 15-14-10020 (sampling, molecular study, treatment of the results) and by grant of Ministry of Science and Education of Republic of Kazakhstan, №1380GF4 (sampling in Southern Kazakhstan). The Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation provided additional funding to the Penza State University to conduct scientific activity in 2014–2016 (sampling and molecular study of the samples from the Penza Region).

References

  1. Aljanabi, S. M. & I. Martinez, 1997. Universal and rapid salt-extraction of high quality genomic DNA for PCR-based techniques. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 4692–4693.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandelt, H., P. Forster & A. Röhl, 1999. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 37–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Berg, L. S., 1949. Fishes of fresh waters of the USSR and adjacent countries. Pt. 2.Google Scholar
  4. Bernatchez, L., 2001. The evolutionary history of brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) inferred from phylogeographic, nested clade, and mismatch analyses of mitochondrial DNA variation. Evolution 55: 351–379.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bianco, P. G. & V. Ketmaier, 2014. A revision of the Rutilus complex from Mediterranean Europe with description of a new genus, Sarmarutilus, and a new species, Rutilus stoumboudae (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Zootaxa 3841: 379–402.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bogutskaya, N. G. & A. M. Naseka, 2004. Catalogue of Agnathans and Fishes of Fresh and Brackish Waters of Russia with Comments on Nomenclature and Taxonomy. The Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  7. Culling, M. A., K. Janko, A. Boron, V. P. Vasil’ev, I. M. Côté & G. M. Hewitt, 2006. European colonization by the spined loach (Cobitis taenia) from Ponto–Caspian refugia based on mitochondrial DNA variation. Molecular Ecology 15: 173–190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dadikyan, M. G., 1986. Fishes of Armenia. AN Arm. SSR, Erevan. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  9. Dukravets, G. M. & E. L. Markova, 1987. Rutilus rutilus aralensis Berg. In Fishes of Kazakhstan. Nauka, Alma Ata, Vol. 2: 32–50 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  10. Dürand, J. D., H. Persat & Y. Bouvet, 1999. Phylogeography and postglacial dispersion of the chub (Leuciscus cephalus) in Europe. Molecular Ecology 8: 989–997.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dürand, J. D., C. S. Tsigenopoulos, E. Ünlü & P. Berrebi, 2002. Phylogeny and biogeography of the family Cyprinidae in the Middle East inferred from cytochrome b DNA—evolutionary significance of this region. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 22: 91–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hänfling, B., C. Dümpelmann, N. G. Bogutskaya, R. Brandl & M. Brändle, 2009. Shallow phylogeographic structuring of Vimba vimba across Europe suggests two distinct refugia during the last glaciation. Journal of Fish Biology 75: 2269–2286.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Helaers, R. & M. C. Milinkovitch, 2010. MetaPIGA v2.0: maximum likelihood large phylogeny estimation using the metapopulation genetic algorithm and other stochastic heuristics. BMC Bioinformatics 11: 379.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Hewitt, G. M., 2004. Genetic consequences of climatic oscillations in the Quaternary. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 359: 183–195.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Kasyanov, A. N., 1983. To the taxonomic status of roach Rutilus rutilus (L.) in the Volga basin. Biology of Inland Waters 60: 51–54. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  16. Ketmaier, V., P. G. Bianco & J. D. Dürand, 2008. Molecular systematics, phylogeny and biogeography of roaches (Rutilus, Teleostei, Cyprinidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 49: 362–367.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Knowles, L. L., 2001. Did the Pleistocene glaciations promote divergence? Tests of explicit refugial models in montane grasshopprers. Molecular Ecology 10: 691–701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kozhara, A. V., 1997. Regular phenotypic changes accompanying osmotic adaptations in some cyprinids: micro vs macroevolution. Zhurnal obshchei biologii 58: 17–26.Google Scholar
  19. Kozhara, A. V. & A. N. Mironovsky, 1995. Selection for tolerance to the increased mineralization—a possible factor of intraspecific divergence in the bream (Abramis brama (L), Cypriniformes, Cyprinidae) from the Caspian Sea drainage. Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii 56: 239–247.Google Scholar
  20. Kotlik, P., N. G. Bogutskaya & F. G. Ekmekci, 2004. Circum Black Sea phylogeography of Barbus freshwater fishes: divergence in the Pontic glacial refugium. Molecular Ecology 13: 87–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kotlik, P., S. Markova, L. Choleva, N. G. Bogutskaya, F. G. Ekmekci & P. P. Ivanova, 2008. Divergence with gene flow between Ponto–Caspian refugia in an anadromous cyprinid Rutilus frisii revealed by multiple gene phylogeography. Molecular Ecology 17: 1076–1088.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kottelat, M. & J. Freyhof, 2007. HANDBOOK of European Freshwater Fishes. Publications Kottelat, Cornol.Google Scholar
  23. Larmuseau, M. H. D., J. Freyhof, F. A. M. Volckaert & J. K. J. Van Houdt, 2009. Matrilinear phylogeography and demographical patterns of Rutilus rutilus: implications for taxonomy and conservation. Journal of Fish Biology 75: 332–353.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Leigh, J. W. & D. Bryant, 2015. Popart: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6: 1110–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levin, B. A. & M. A. Levina, 2015. About species status and the phylogenetic position of the roaches of the genus Rutilus in the Rybinsk Reservoir. In Gerassimov, Yu V (ed.), Fishes of the Rybinskoe Reservoir: Population Dynamics and Ecology. Filigran, Yaroslavl: 265–270.Google Scholar
  26. Librado, P. & J. Rozas, 2009. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25: 1451–1452.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Machordom, A. & I. Doadrio, 2001. Evidence of a Cenozoic Betic-Kabilian connection based on freshwater fish phylogeography (Luciobarbus, Cyprinidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 18: 252–263.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mina, M. V., Y. S. Reshetnikov & Y. Y. Dgebuadze, 2006. Taxonomic novelties and problems for users. Journal of Ichthyology 46: 476–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mironovsky, A. N., Yu G Iziumov, A. N. Kasyanov & O. G. Vaniushina, 1991. On possible meaning of permanent intensive disruptive selection as a factor determining phenetic structure of Rutilus rutilus (L.) in the Volga-Caspian region. Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii 52: 656–672. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  30. Nelson, J. S., T. C. Grande & M. V. H. Wilson, 2016. Fishes of the World, 5th ed. Wiley, Hoboken.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pallas, P. S., 1814. Zoographia Rosso-Asiatica: sistens omnium animalium in extenso Imperio Rossico et adiacentibus maribus observatorum recensionem, domicilia, mores et descriptiones anatomen atque icones plurimorum. Vol. 1. Petropoli.Google Scholar
  32. Palumbi, S. R., 1996. Nucleic acids II: the polymerase chain reaction. Molecular Systematics 2: 205–247.Google Scholar
  33. Perdices, A. & I. Doadrio, 2001. The molecular systematics and biogeography of the European cobitids based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 19: 468–478.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Perea, S., M. Böhme, P. Zupančič, J. Freyhof, R. Šanda, M. Özuluğ, A. Abdoli & I. Doadrio, 2010. Phylogenetic relationships and biogeographical patterns in Circum-Mediterranean subfamily Leuciscinae (Teleostei, Cyprinidae) inferred from both mitochondrial and nuclear data. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Posada, D., 2009. Selection of models of DNA evolution with jMODELTEST. Bioinformatics for DNA Sequence Analysis 537: 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. QGIS Development Team, 2016. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project: http://qgis.osgeo.org.
  37. Rambaut, A., 2008. FigTree v1.4: tree figure drawing tool [available at http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/].
  38. Rambaut, A., M. A. Suchard, D. Xie & A. J. Drummond, 2014. Tracer v1.6 [available at http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer].
  39. Reshetnikov, Yu S, O. A. Popova & L. I. Sokolov, 2003. Atlas of Russian Freshwater Fishes, Vol. 1. Nauka, Moscow.Google Scholar
  40. Ronquist, F., M. Teslenko, P. van der Mark, D. L. Ayres, A. Darling, S. Höhna, B. Larget, L. Liu, M. A. Suchard & J. P. Huelsenbeck, 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Seifertová, M., J. Bryja, M. Vyskočilová, N. Martínková & A. Šimková, 2012. Multiple Pleistocene refugia and post-glacial colonization in the European chub (Squalius cephalus) revealed by combined use of nuclear and mitochondrial markers. Journal of Biogeography 39: 1024–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stierandová, S., J. Vukić, E. D. Vasil’eva, S. Zogaris, S. Shumka, K. Halačka, L. Vetešník, M. Švátora, M. Nowak, T. Stefanov, J. Koščo & J. Mendel, 2016. A multilocus assessment of nuclear and mitochondrial sequence data elucidates phylogenetic relationships among European spirlins (Alburnoides, Cyprinidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9: 479–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tamura, K., G. Stecher, D. Peterson, A. Filipski & S. Kumar, 2013. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 2725–2729.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Thompson, J. D., T. J. Gibson, F. Plewniak, F. Jeanmougin & D. G. Higgins, 1997. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 4876–4882.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Timoshkina, N. N., A. E. Barmintseva, A. V. Usatov & N. S. Mugue, 2009. Intraspecific genetic polymorphism of Russian sturgeon Acipenser gueldenstaedtii. Russian Journal of Genetics 45: 1098–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tsoumani, M., A. Georgiadis, I. A. Giantsis, I. Leonardos & A. P. Apostolidis, 2014. Phylogenetic relationships among Southern Balkan Rutilus species inferred from cytochrome b sequence analysis: Micro-geographic resolution and taxonomic implications. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 54: 172–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zardoya, R. & I. Doadrio, 1999. Molecular evidence on the evolutionary and biogeographical patterns of European cyprinids. Journal of Molecular Evolution 49: 227–237.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. A. Levin
    • 1
  • E. P. Simonov
    • 1
    • 2
  • O. A. Ermakov
    • 3
  • M. A. Levina
    • 1
  • E. A. Interesova
    • 2
  • O. M. Kovalchuk
    • 4
  • Y. A. Malinina
    • 5
  • N. S. Mamilov
    • 6
  • N. J. Mustafayev
    • 7
  • D. V. Pilin
    • 8
  • I. V. Pozdeev
    • 9
  • N. I. Prostakov
    • 10
  • H. R. Roubenyan
    • 11
  • S. V. Titov
    • 3
  • D. A. Vekhov
    • 12
  1. 1.Papanin Institute of Biology of Inland WatersRussian Academy of SciencesBorokRussia
  2. 2.Tomsk State UniversityTomskRussia
  3. 3.Penza State UniversityPenzaRussia
  4. 4.Department of PaleontologyNational Museum of Natural History at the National Academy of Sciences of UkraineKievUkraine
  5. 5.State Research Institute of Lake and River FisheriesSaratov BranchRussia
  6. 6.Science Research Institute of Biology and BiotechnologyAl-Farabi Kazakh National UniversityAlma-AtaKazakhstan
  7. 7.Institute of ZoologyNational Academy of Sciences of AzerbaijanBakuAzerbaijan
  8. 8.Kazakh Research Institute of FisheryUralskKazakhstan
  9. 9.State Research Institute of Lake and River Fisheries (GosNIORKh)Perm BranchRussia
  10. 10.Voronezh State UniversityVoronezhRussia
  11. 11.Scientific Center of Zoology and HydroecologyNational Academy of Sciences of Republic of ArmeniaYerevanArmenia
  12. 12.State Research Institute of Lake and River Fisheries (GosNIORKh)Volgograd BranchRussia

Personalised recommendations