Effects of interspecific gene flow on the phenotypic variance–covariance matrix in Lake Victoria Cichlids
- 307 Downloads
Quantitative genetics theory predicts adaptive evolution to be constrained along evolutionary lines of least resistance. In theory, hybridization and subsequent interspecific gene flow may, however, rapidly change the evolutionary constraints of a population and eventually change its evolutionary potential, but empirical evidence is still scarce. Using closely related species pairs of Lake Victoria cichlids sampled from four different islands with different levels of interspecific gene flow, we tested for potential effects of introgressive hybridization on phenotypic evolution in wild populations. We found that these effects differed among our study species. Constraints measured as the eccentricity of phenotypic variance–covariance matrices declined significantly with increasing gene flow in the less abundant species for matrices that have a diverged line of least resistance. In contrast, we find no such decline for the more abundant species. Overall our results suggest that hybridization can change the underlying phenotypic variance–covariance matrix, potentially increasing the adaptive potential of such populations.
KeywordsEccentricity Line of least resistance Hybridization Evolutionary constraints P matrix
We thank Bänz Lundsgaard-Hansen, Blake Matthews, Joana Meier, Julia Schwarzer, Matthew McGee and Etienne Bezault for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript. Two anonymous reviewers and Martin Genner provided further constructive inputs. We acknowledge support from the Swiss National Science Foundation, Grant 31003A_144046 to OS. KL was funded by a Swiss National Science Foundation Early Postdoc. Mobility Grant P2BEP3_152103.
- Abbott, R., D. Albach, S. Ansell, J. W. Arntzen, S. J. E. Baird, N. Bierne, J. W. Boughman, A. Brelsford, C. A. Buerkle, R. Buggs, R. K. Butlin, U. Dieckmann, F. Eroukhmanoff, A. Grill, S. H. Cahan, J. S. Hermansen, G. Hewitt, A. G. Hudson, C. Jiggins, J. Jones, B. Keller, T. Marczewski, J. Mallet, P. Martinez-Rodriguez, M. Möst, S. Mullen, R. Nichols, A. W. Nolte, C. Parisod, K. Pfennig, A. M. Rice, M. G. Ritchie, B. Seifert, C. M. Smadja, R. Stelkens, J. M. Szymura, R. Vainola, J. B. W. Wolf & D. Zinner, 2013. Hybridization and speciation. Journal of evolutionary Biology 26: 229–246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arnold, S. J. & P. C. Phillips, 1999. Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance-covariance matrices. II. Coastal-inland divergence in the garter snake. Thamnophis elegans. Evolution 53: 1516–1527.Google Scholar
- Falconer, D. S., 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
- Fox, J. & S. Weisberg, 2011. An R Companion to Applied Regression. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
- Greg, S., 2015. Lake Victoria Shapefiles. figshare. https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1494839.v1
- Meier, J. I., V. C. Sousa, D. A. Marques, O. M. Selz, C. E. Wagner, L. Excoffier, & O. Seehausen, 2016. Demographic modeling of whole genome data reveals parallel origin of similar Pundamilia cichlid species after hybridization. submitted.Google Scholar
- Nolte, A. W., J. Freyhof, K. Stemshorn & D. Tautz, 2005. An invasive lineage of sculpins, Cottus sp (Pisces, Teleostei) in the Rhine with new habitat adaptations has originated from hybridization between old phylogeographic groups. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 272: 2379–2387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schluter, D., 2000. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Seehausen, O., E. Lippitsch, N. Bouton & H. Zwennes, 1998. Mbipi, the rock-dwelling cichlids of Lake Victoria: description of three new genera and fifteen new species (Teleostei). Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 9: 129–228.Google Scholar
- Seehausen, O., R. K. Butlin, I. Keller, C. E. Wagner, J. W. Boughman, P. A. Hohenlohe, C. L. Peichel, G.-P. Saetre, C. Bank, Å. Brännström, A. Brelsford, C. S. Clarkson, F. Eroukhmanoff, J. L. Feder, M. C. Fischer, A. D. Foote, P. Franchini, C. D. Jiggins, F. C. Jones, A. K. Lindholm, K. Lucek, M. E. Maan, D. A. Marques, S. H. Martin, B. Matthews, J. I. Meier, M. Möst, M. W. Nachman, E. Nonaka, D. J. Rennison, J. Schwarzer, E. T. Watson, A. M. Westram & A. Widmer, 2014. Genomics and the origin of species. Nature Reviews Genetics 15: 176–192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wright, S., 1932. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proceedings of the sixth international congress of genetics: 356–366.Google Scholar